Newark Mayor to go on food stamps for a week
Linkedin

Newark Mayor to go on food stamps for a week

Newark : NJ : USA | Nov 24, 2012 at 9:09 PM PST
XX XX
Views: Pending
 
The mayor will live on $4 - $5 a day?  (Video:  Youtube)

Mayor Cory Booker pf Newark, N.J., has today confirmed that he will live on nothing but food stamps the week of Dec. 4-11.

Booker decided to take the “food stamp challenge” after tweeting with a woman who calls herself TwitWit. She further described herself as a “Daughter of the American Revolution, fighting against any and all forms of socialism/communism.. Army Veteran, Army Daughter, Army Wife.”

TwitWit charged Booker with being a secret socialist who was attempting to “redistribute” wealth. As Exhibit A, she pointed to Booker’s attempts to provide school breakfasts and lunches for needy children. She made it clear that she did not accept nor believe that providing food to hungry people is a proper function of government.

Booker responded:

“We have a shared responsibility that kids go to school nutritionally ready 2 learn.”

TwitWit came back with:

“why is there a family today that is ‘too poor to afford breakfast’? are they not already receiving food stamps?”

Booker then issued the challenge:

“Lets you and I try to live on food stamps in New Jersey (high cost of living) and feed a family for a week or month. U game?”

TwitWit agreed and the “game” is set to begin on Dec. 4.

New Jersey provides $133.26 for an adult’s monthly food stamp benefit – about $4.00 a day, or the cost of a medium sized latte at Starbucks.

According to the Associated Press, Booker told reporters, "This will not be a gimmick or a stunt," but is an opportunity "for us to grow in compassion and understanding." He also said that he wanted to explode stereotypes. The mayor of Phoenix also tried to live on a food stamp budget a few months ago. He failed, because, he said, he became “tired” and it was “hard to focus.”

The AP also tracked down TwitWit. She’s a 39-year-old woman from North Carolina who believes that the more government gives to people, the more they will want, including, especially, food. “There is going to be a lot more of us needing those food stamps if it doesn't stop,” she said.

In a classic demonstration of the notion of poor and working class white folks voting against their own interests, TwitWit told AP that her own family is just “Six months away from being in debt and on welfare ourselves. Most of us [poor white people] are in the same boat. … Some of us just aren't getting the assistance."

Opinion:

In 1982, Chicago’s first female mayor, Jane Byrne, physically moved into Chicago’s most notorious high-rise housing project, Cabrini Green. During her three-week stint at Cabrini, crime plummeted precipitously – which, she claimed, was her intention all along. But how could crime not fall? After all, Byrne moved into Cabrini Green with an entire phalanx of uniformed and undercover cops as her personal security detail. Byrne was known for her acerbic language and often outlandish plans for improving the city. (She actually turned the busiest section of State Street -- that “Great Street” -- into a mall, closed to all but bus traffic. After her defeat at the polls, State Street merchants got the street re-opened again).

And, when Byrne returned to her tony digs on Chicago's "Gold Coast," crime at Cabrini immediately shot back up to its "normally" outrageous and over-the-top levels.

So, like Byrne’s move into Cabrini, I think it’s fair to say that Booker’s “food stamp challenge” is little more than a publicity stunt. The man is an obviously ambitious politician who I’m sure does not see a helluva future as mayor to one of the country’s poorest and most crime-infested cities.

As to TwitWit, as intimated above, she is a classic example of why white racism and white supremacy maintain such a stranglehold on this nation-state’s body politic. Her refusal, for example, to accept food stamps for her own hungry family is rooted in a belief system that reinforces a bias and bigotry against people who do. She obviously is not aware that there are far more white recipients of food stamps than black or brown. Yet, she believes that more “people of color” partake of the government teat than do people who “look like her.”

She is the definition of the “low information voter.” And it is this type of poor and working class white person who has most vociferously objected to black advancement down through the years. Why? They see black people, brown people as threats to their own economic and political security. It is they who are required to compete with blacks and browns for jobs and school slots, not their middle class and upper middle class compatriots. For TwitWit, the provision of simple sustenance for poor children of color means that there will be less somewhere else for her and her children, even though she claims not to want it. It has always been a zero-sum affair for her and her fellow classmates.

References:

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/11/newark-mayor-cory-bookers-food-stamp-challenge/

http://www.alternet.org/speakeasy/alyssa-figueroa/mayor-cory-booker-live-food-stamps-week?page=entire

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/21/cory-booker-food-stamps_n_2170295.html

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/newark-booker-live-food-stamps-boost-poverty-awareness-article-1.1206146

http://www.vibe.com/article/mayor-cory-booker-goes-food-stamps

Back
1 of 3
Next
This sounds more like a crash diet than a social or political statement.  (Video:  Youtube)
Herbert Dyer, Jr. is based in Chicago, Illinois, United States of America, and is an Anchor for Allvoices.
Report Credibility
 
  • Clear
  • Share:
  • Share
  • Clear
  • Clear
  • Clear
  • Clear
 
 
Advertisement
 
Posted By plsmitha Phyllis L. Smith Asinyanbi | 6 months ago
Thank you for writing this, Herb. I read about Mayor Booker's food stamp publicity stunt. It will be interesting to see the outcome, but then again, what will it prove? Living in an urban environment, we already know the facts and the reality for many.
Reply By stevewonder2 stevewonder2 | 6 months ago
Booker and Christie BOTH need to take a public ethics course.
New Jersians need to stop embracing their decades-old, Louisiana-Illinois" culture of political corruption!!
Sandy was a long overdue WAKE UP CALL for REAL CHANGE in Jersey
Reply By herbinchi Herbert Dyer, Jr. | 6 months ago
Phyllis,

Thanks for reading. I see them both, Booker and TwitWit, as disingenuous and hypocritical. Although food stamps are a necessary evil, Booker should be working to eliminate the need, the poverty which necessitates that evil.

TwitWit should get off her racist high horse, and realize that government assistance is often a welcomed proposition. No? Ask the folks along the Jersey Shore who're still suffering because of Hurricane Sandi. At this point, I don't think they care what color the person is who's trying to get their lights back on or deliver "MRE's" (Meals Ready to Eat) to their families.

Thanks again.
Posted By itobin53 itobin53 | 6 months ago
TwitWit seems to favor our current lot of GOP socialists who are "attempting to “redistribute” wealth" to the rich. Same thing different income group.

As for Booker and his week of food stamps - a nice but useless publicity stunt. He needs to try them for a full month - since they run out after 2 weeks no matter how cheap the food.
Posted By rosamimosa rosamimosa | 6 months ago
I don't believe Booker's reply to TwitWit is a publicity stunt, but rather a statement in response to a narrow minded, ignorant woman, with possibly racist leanings. Unemployment is a serious matter for many families who just one or two years ago would have donated to their local food bank, Salvation Army or the United Way. Now these same families are on food stamps. Note to TwitWit, free lunch is national government program for children to enable them to function and grow well. What sincere human being is against helping others having financial hardship put food on their children's plates? Booker's challenge is to let her and many know that being poor, receiving food stamps and struggling when you are out of work or working for miminal wage is a serious hardship.

The name of the woman says it all: "Twit Wit"
Posted By joycesingha joycesingha | 6 months ago
Where is everybody getting this 'racially charged woman' from?
The woman is making perfect sense, the government is becoming the biggest enabler. And what is Booker trying to prove anyway? Having to live on food stamps is crappy enough.
Posted By StephEaly Stephanie Ealy | 6 months ago
Alright, alright Herb, love your writing but absolutely disagree with our point of view. For one thing, I know many white people who "use" the system and take advantage of food stamps when they are perfectly capable of getting a job. But unfortunately in the case of the folks I know, they won't take a fast food job in the beginning because they are "too good" for that kind of a job. I have a good paying day job that I landed because I was not "too good" to do the menial jobs in the beginning. Like taking and hour and a half job sorting mail just to get my foot in the door at the school district office where I work. Some of these food stamp recipients would never take that job because it is easier for them to sit on their butt all day and collect entitlements.
Posted By stevewonder2 stevewonder2 | 6 months ago
Booker and Christie BOTH need to take a public ethics course.
New Jersians need to stop embracing their decades-old, Louisiana-Illinois" culture of political corruption!!!!!!!
Posted By cfmurray55 cfmurray55 | 6 months ago
Herb, there was NEVER any mention of racism in the comments from Twitwit. The first mention of racism comes from the part of the article called ¨Opinion¨, and you´re the one exhibiting it. The comments agreeing with you, are showing that you´re not the only racist on this website. As has been said, poverty and food stamps are equal opportunity. Black, white, yellow, and red folk use them, and there are people from all walks of life who abuse the program, because they´re too lazy to get a job. No, that was not an ethnic slur. I said all walks of life. Being lazy is not relegated to one group or another. There used to be a thing called ¨pride¨, where people were too proud to ACCEPT foodstamps. But with the current administration trying to put as many people on the public dole, as is humanly possible, and people always trying to get something for nothing, you have the situation you have now, where the electorate is prostituting themselves to the highest bidder. But as Margaret Thatcher said, ¨The problem with socialism, is that sooner or later, you run out of other people´s money.¨ I´d like to add, ¨or you´ll have a situation like Greece¨.
Posted By Rhonnda Rhonnda | 6 months ago
--I am sick and tired of these "TwitNits" who have no concept of what poverty is really like because they are comfortably sheltered by pensions, jobs and inheritances! More of those degenerates need to experience reality instead of mouthing off from their pampered , warm homes, etc. about the social economics of the poor. There are 'problem' people amongst the financially secure more than amongst the poor, so get off your uneducated high horses and reach out to HELP others instead of criticizing those who cannot fight back. And, by the way, 'yeah' for true socialism, because then no one would be starving or freezing in doorways!!
Advertisement
 

More From Allvoices

Report Your News Got a similar story?
Add it to the network!

Or add related content to this report

 
Tap_logo_330_110_event
 


Use of this site is governed by our Terms of Use Agreement and Privacy Policy.

© Allvoices, Inc 2008-2013. All rights reserved.