A true sign of division within the Republican Party is their message to Mitt Romney after his ill-advised message to his campaign donors yesterday. The Republican elite has responded by telling Mitt not to go away mad, but to go away.
Romney's message to campaign donors in a phone call yesterday resembled the comments he made in a backroom comment about the "47 percent" during the campaign. Romney told donors the reason he lost the election was because President Obama doled out gifts to young people and minorities.
It was no secret during the campaign that although Romney tried to present himself as a conservative during the GOP primaries, he never won the hearts of the conservative wing of the Republican party. In the end, his support for some of the extreme right positions on abortion and contraception lost him the election. Obviously the so-called 47 percent paid back Romney and the right-wing extremists on social issues. They certainly didn't buy his message.
The Republican party knows it has work to do and must become inclusive to all Americans, including the Hispanic and black communities.
Louisianna Gov. Bobby Jindal said it best when he said that the party must stop dividing Americans and become all-inclusive:
“We have got to stop dividing American voters. I absolutely reject that notion, that description. We’re fighting for 100 percent of the vote."
Others noted that the Republican party is not just for those who are not dependent on the government.
Opinion:
Romney was probably the best out of the crop of candidates the Republicans offered during the primary this year. In the end the party never really accepted Romney for several reasons, including his record as a fairly moderate governor of Massachuesetts. Romney was unable to connect with the electorate, and his five-point economic plan was not convincing.
One could state a myriad of reasons for Romney not succeeding, but his biggest fault could be described as "foot-in-mouth" disease. The Republican party and Romney failed to realize where society was at and underestimated the strength of social issues, which sent women into the Obama camp in droves.
The true test of the Republican party will be in how they react to resolving the fiscal cliff, how the party moves forward in the next four years and how it resolves the social issues.
There is a string of potential candidates of young and upcoming legislators and governors, including Jindal and Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida. What is clear is that the party has to get rid of the "Party of the Rich" labeling.
If you like writing about US politics and Campaign 2012, enter "The American Pundit" competition. Allvoices is awarding four $250 prizes each month between now and Nov. 15. These monthly winners earn eligibility for the $5,000 grand prize, to be awarded in December
Source:
Or add related content to this report
News Stories | Blogs | Images | Videos | Comments
Mitt Romney proved why he wasn't the right choice. That was anything but presidential. The thing that annoyed me is that Mitt Romney redefined himself about 5 times from January until the election. I used to like him but didn't know which Mitt Romney would show up.
Johnson's message is a good one, and one that a major party would have been wise to embrace. They may not have won with Johnson, but the GOP would have taken a step in the direction of inclusion rather than re-enforcing Romney's tired old divide-and-conquer message.
And if Ron Paul had been 10-15 years younger in 2012, he may well have won both the nomination and the presidency with the kind of overwhelming support that propelled Ronald Reagan to victory in 1980.
The long primary with Rick Santorum pushing all the outdated social issues was not helpful either. People don't like flip flops. It backfired before and will backfire again.
I think the Republican Party killed itself and any hope for anyone who would succeed in the primaries. They opened up issues that were not relevant to this election. The Obama machine took a gamble and guessed that Romney would win and started defining him long before he was a nominee.
The only difference between most repubs and Mitt is that Mitt got caught - twice- saying exactly what he means; government welfare is great, but only for the rich.
I am afraid that all politicians are made of the same stripe. After an election, with the outrageous cost and funding of elections, it's always pay back time. Lobbyists and politicians work hand in hand.