The leading source for credible citizen reporting

Report Your News
Take the tour...

Is war with Pakistan Imminent?

By: amra1 send a private message
San Francisco : CA : USA | about 1 year ago  
Views: 404

So I am not alone, I just read an article by a Pakistani born Journalist Tariq Ali “ Has U.S Invasion of Pakistan Begun?” He points out that the “next war” may already be creeping upon us. Already Pakistani’s sovereignty has functionally been declared of no significance by the US president.

Tariq Ali asks a question Why the US has decided to destabilize a cruel ally like Pakistan? He suggests that some analysts are saying to that the strategy is to destabilize Pakistan and extract Pakistan’s nuclear capability. But Tariq Ali seems to think that the war relates to Bush’s disastrous occupation of Afghanistan….Karzai is becoming more isolated and is known as the mayor of Kabul… So what is the strategy : when in doubt, escalate the war… similar decisions where taken by President Richard Nixon and his Henry Kissinger in the past…. A link to the entire article by Tariq Ali in the news stories Tab below

I hope we are not going into another war, neither Pakistan nor US needs another war. Destabilization of Pakistan would destroy the region. The US financial system is crisis and we cannot pay for another war! But if the US continues to strike Pakistan’s Tribal areas with Hellfire-missile armed predator drones, we will see Pakistan retaliate…. This is what I have been reading from the contributions made by the allvoices community, especially from allvoices contributors on-the-ground in Pakistan : “The official said the civil and military leadership of Pakistan would make it clear to the US commander that only Pakistani security forces would take any action on the Pakistani soil and foreign troops would be never allowed to take any action on the pretext of so-called hot pursuit” . Both the civil and military leadership of Pakistan have said that Angoor Adda-like incidents will not be accepted and if any such action took place in future, the aggressors will be paid in the same coin . There is complete unanimity of views between the civil and military leaders of the country on this issue. Admiral Michael Mullen would be told that Pakistan’s armed forces would now retaliate with full force any cross-border strikes in future.

  • Print
  • Share:
  • Share
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Stumbleupon

Related Allvoices Contributions

News Stories
 
  • Submitted By: amra1 | about 1 year ago
    When in doubt, escalate the war is an old imperial motto. The strikes against Pakistan represent -- like the decisions of President Richard Nixon and his National Security Adviser Henry Kissinger to bomb and then invade Cambodia (acts that, in the ...
  • Submitted By: drawab | about 1 year ago
  • News Source: Canadian Dimension | about 1 year ago
    As Andrew Bacevich tells us in the latest issue of the Atlantic, there’s now a vigorous debate going on in the military about the nature of the “next” American wars and how to prepare for them. However, while military officers argue, that...
  • News Source: CNN | about 1 year ago
    Pakistan will not allow foreign powers to violate the country's sovereignty to pursue terrorists, the country's new president, Asif Ali Zardari, said Saturday. "We will not tolerate the violation of our sovereignty and territorial integrity by any...
  • News Source: The Guardian | about 1 year ago
    Asif Ali Zardari, the widower of the assassinated former prime minister, Benazir Bhutto, has faced mounting anger within the country following a series of American missile attacks and ground assaults in Pakistan's north-west tribal regions, near the...
  • News Source: pakistantimes | about 1 year ago
    Admitting that unilateral actions into Pakistani territory are not a viable long-term solution to security situation along Pak-Afghan border, a top U.S. diplomat has said cooperative efforts by the anti-terrorism partners provide the best way forward.
Blogs
 >
  • Blog Source: intellibriefs.blogspot.com
    Minister Benazir Bhutto's spouse, Asif Ali Zardari, became President of Pakistan, securing more than two... as dead. Army on the Rocks Gen. Tariq Majid, chairman of Pakistan's Joint Chiefs of Staff Committee
  • Blog Source: www.socialistworld.net
    in the tribal areas were not destroyed by Pakistan armed forces, the US and NATO forces would cross... areas, are a result of increased pressure from the Bush administration on the newly elected Pakistan
  • Blog Source: aangirfan.blogspot.com
    In the Guardian, 7 September 2008, Tariq Ali wrote that "a hardcore neocon faction led by Zalmay Khalilzad, the US ambassador to the Security Council, was busy advising Asif Zardari in secret and helping him plan the campaign to oust ...
Videos
 >
 
  • Posted By amra1 amra1 | about 1 year ago

    Wow Drawab! another US strike.... This is aweful!

  • Reply By drawab drawab | about 1 year ago

    its all now a serious business - and our Pakistani leaders continue to play deaf and dumb - while the american compatriaots out run us - I dont know which logic is being used - are we to graze the entire country of Pakistan into the ground all in vengence and 'revenge' for the 3000 who lost their lives in 9/11


    it seems humanity has a very high price to pay for each lost life in New York that fateful day

  • Posted By maverick maverick | about 1 year ago

    Yes, it seem they want to kill 30 million people for every 9/11 victim to sooth the souls of those who had died in New York. But the seem deliberately ignoring that losses to achieve this "objective" might be much heavy.

  • Posted By amra1 amra1 | about 1 year ago

    I hope this does not escalate  as the price we will all have to pay will be enourmous....

  • Posted By yoman yoman | about 1 year ago

    It seems to me that many forget the fact that US government "liked" President Musharraf. As he has stepped down, it means an instability from a US perspective as they do not control a region they believe is a aorta for terrorists or the recruitment of them. Probably a large portion of the reasons for these activities is to shaken up Pakistan to be more "obliging" in the eyes of the US. 


    True or not. The lack of respect for the sovereignty of countries needs to stop. The signs are there for a really bad conflict unfortunately. Even worse this time both the combatants have nuclear weapons. That is the really scary part of all this.

  • Reply By amra1 amra1 | about 1 year ago

    Yoman,  I used to think that Musharraf was the greatest thing that had happened to Pakistan since I live in San Francisco, but when I went to Pakistan this year during the elections, I was surprised to find that the people of Pakistan hated him. The people voted to get Musharraf out of office, instead of a particular political party..

    In fact his nickname is Busharraf. People of Pakistan just don't want US to interfere with their country…..sounds familiar

  • Posted By Hydro Hydro | about 1 year ago

    US has got not what it is up to, war in Iraq, war in Afganistan and now Pakistan, I mean what does Bush think he is? these wars are only going to earn him and the citizens of USA a big loss they can not imagine what they will be facing very soon! USA is fighting a war that it lost years ago, its not about terrorists its about power world monopoly its a game and a war againt Islam. The saying is every dog shall have its day and today its Bush's the dogs day!

  • Posted By ahmad ahmad | about 1 year ago

    I have strong doubts about the opening of a war between Pakistan and US; however the skirmishes would further unsettle the already dangerously unsettled tribal belt between Afghanistan and Pakistan. Pakistan could be the biggest loser in the process. The history however is a witness to the fact that no foreign invader is ever successful in achieving its objectives of war against the tribes. 

  • Posted By slydog slydog | 9 months ago
    It seems you were quite prescient with regards to Pakistan..of course you would be more in touch with their politik. It seems the embarassing outing of the General (aided no doubt from fickle allies with ulterior motives)coupled with the assasination of Bhutto has left precisely the void of instability you described 5 months ago in the above missive. So now, does a de-stabilized Pakistan give impetus to a new administration to approach august bodies like the UN for a mandate for critical interventions (questionmark broken on keyboard!) The key WILL be to ensure missiles and things nuclear never fall into the hands of Muslim zealots..and rightly so! Your forethought will most likely prove to be 20-20 vision in the not too distant future. Given the present political turmoil in Pakistan right now I fear that intervention is both pragmatic & perhaps necessary. However, another theatre of war is a foreboding concept for all concerned. Your writing, thinking and instincts are quite perceptive, to say the least. You`ve helped open my eyes..fer sure! Thank you! Andy in New West
  • Reply By amra1 amra1 | 9 months ago
    Thanks Slydog, look where we are today with the instability in pakistan again!
  • Reported by Amra Tareen
    Report Your News Got a similar story?
    Add it to the network!

    Or add related content to this report

    Cell phones Cell phones use report code: @1333655

    Most Popular Reports

    Related Allvoices Reports

    Related People

    Contributions

    Help and Accounts


    Use of this site is governed by our Terms of Use Agreement and Privacy Policy.

    © Allvoices, Inc 2008-2009. All rights reserved.