Iran agrees to have nuclear talks with US officials
Linkedin

Iran agrees to have nuclear talks with US officials

New York City : NY : USA | Oct 20, 2012 at 3:14 PM PDT
XX XX
Views: Pending
 
A shot has been fired at a campaign office for President Barack Obama in the western US state of Colorado

For the first time, Iran has agreed to have one-on-one negotiations with the United States over its controversial nuclear program. It is a big breakthrough, and a victory of President Obama. The backdoor negotiations with Iranian officials have finally worked out. As the progress has been achieved through diplomatic efforts, the president’s stance that the issue of Iran’s nuclear program can be resolved through dialogue and diplomatic means stands vindicated. The president has always put aside the suggestions to attack nuclear facilities of Iran.

How is the development going to help President Obama in the election campaign? The announcement has come just weeks before Election Day and a day before the final election debate. The third and final presidential debate is going to be held on Monday in Florida, where issues pertaining to foreign policy and national security are likely to come up. Obama would definitely highlight his success to bring Iran to the negotiating table.

Iran cannot remain in isolation for long. Also, economic sanctions have badly ruined the economy of the country and latest reports in the media suggest that Iran’s currency, the rial, has plummeted to an historic low. Iranian leadership has been left with no option but to reconcile with the United States and take the world powers onboard regarding the nuclear program of the country.

How is Mitt Romney likely to respond to the development? We don’t know exactly what is on his mind, but if we look back at a few statements of his, we come to know that he has always sided with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

Netanyahu and his defense minister, Ehud Barak, believe there is no other option but to strike the nuclear facilities of Iran. Both of them have also tried to convince the Obama administration for the attack but could not do it. Romney has also been criticizing President Obama for not dealing with Iran effectively. So the Republican presidential candidate would definitely cast doubt on the development, and rightly so. How can it be assumed that Iran is serious to have meaningful dialogue with the US to resolve the issue of its nuclear program?

Iran might be using the proposed dialogue as a time-buying tactic. But how long Iran can live with the tactics? US officials should take the development seriously and work out different strategies to resolve the issue. The process of dialogue can also help Obama win the election, but only if it is taken on the right course.

Back
1 of 29
Next
Iran agrees to nuclear talks
Image: Reuters
StephenManual is based in New York City, New York, United States of America, and is a Reporter for Allvoices.
Report Credibility
 
  • Clear
  • Share:
  • Share
  • Clear
  • Clear
  • Clear
  • Clear
 
 
Advertisement
 
Posted By frenco frenco | 7 months ago
what a big story.all muslims and non muslims all over, i guess were very happy to know tbe "good" news reported by you. As we,especially politician claimed. living in the modern world, the peak of human being civilasation-there should be "no more war", we deserved to live in peace and hamony.good job,rated up
Posted By albertacowpoke Karl Gotthardt | 7 months ago
The White House has denied the NY Times report of one on one nuclear talks, as per statement published in the Huffington Post:

"Shortly after the Times' report went live, the White House released a statement from National Security Council Spokesperson Tommy Vietor, calling the report "not true."

It’s not true that the United States and Iran have agreed to one-on-one talks or any meeting after the American elections. We continue to work with the P5+1* on a diplomatic solution and have said from the outset that we would be prepared to meet bilaterally. The President has made clear that he will prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon, and we will do what we must to achieve that. It has always been our goal for sanctions to pressure Iran to come in line with its obligations. The onus is on the Iranians to do so, otherwise they will continue to face crippling sanctions and increased pressure."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/20/us-iran-nuclear-talks_n_1994297.html

I heard about your report earlier tonight, but the White House has debunked the NY Time report. Is that another attempt by the msm to influence the election? Good on the White House to issue their statement. There is honour among thieves after all.
Posted By Anyvoice Anyvoice | 7 months ago
The ayatollahs in Iran as Saddam Hussein was had figured out how to play the west, by throwing bones at the West in some intervals will buy them the time needed to achieve their goal.

It is unfortunate that those who have not the perspective of history will continue to fall for it.

Their is no good news here, Stephen.
Posted By saleh1966 saleh1966 | 7 months ago
This is nothing but a ploy to help Obama stay in the WH for another term.

Iran prefers Obama as president because they can run circles around him and they know for sure that they will achieve nuclear weapons capability under him.
Reply By Anyvoice Anyvoice | 7 months ago
saleh,

Couldn't agree more. Seeing how Iran has been engaged in Syria, I don't think anyone in the middle east will want to see Iran get their nuclear bomb.
Posted By NinaRai Nina Rai | 7 months ago
This is 'good news' Stephen.
I sincerely hope and wish this info
is true. The goal should be to avoid
a conflict between Iran and Israel
which will be catastrophic in the
region. If US gets involved so will
Russia and China on the other side..
hope better sense prevails.
Posted By JohnRobertHuetteman J. R. Huetteman | 7 months ago
This could be good news if it ever materializes and actual "talks" occur. Even better would be to come to an agreement with Iran on certain key issues. However, in theory, I believe all countries should have an independent right to pursue whatever it is they want to pursue - whether it be a nuclear program or anything else. In this particular case, I do understand America's particular position on the matter and our history with Israel. As Nina states, a conflict between Israel and Iran is something that should be avoided as it would be globally catastrophic. What else can I say except great job on this report and I hope all goes well!
Posted By ahmed444 Ahmed Mohamed Ibrahim | 7 months ago
There seems to be political maneuvering between the parties:
Iran and the United States of America

It seems the goal the continuation of the current situation

Each party does not want to declare defeat and sufficiency only media statements about talks unclear
Advertisement
 

News Stories

 
  • Iran Said Ready to Talk to U.S. About Nuclear Program

    The New York Times
    Iranian officials have insisted that the talks wait until after the presidential election, a senior administration official said, telling their American counterparts that they want to know which American president they would be negotiating with. News...
  • Israel's former Mossad chief urges dialogue with Iran, calls Obama ...

    Haaretz
    A former head of Israel's intelligence service Mossad on Monday urged the West to solve the nuclear dispute with Iran through diplomacy rather than military action...President Barack Obama's approach to Iran, saying that Republican challenger Mitt...
  • Foreign Policy Debate: Rhetoric Vs. Reality

    National Public Radio
    On Iran, our panelists disagree about what the next step should be for the U.S. All agree that a military strike should be the last option, but Perle argues that the effectiveness of the current sanctions is running low. Harman says she hopes that...
  • Final presidential debate salvos fired over foreign policy

    Denver Post
    Fla.  President Barack Obama and Republican Mitt Romney spent their final debate Monday circling the globe's hot spots as they clashed over the merits of diplomacy and brinkmanship in Libya, Israel, Iran, the Middle East and other volatile areas. But...
  • Netanyahu says doesn't know of any U.S.-Iran talks

    Reuters
    Topics Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu attends the weekly cabinet meeting in Jerusalem October 21, 2012. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said on Sunday he didn't know about any U.S. plans to talk bilaterally with Iran, saying tougher...
  • Obama warns Iran over nuclear programme

    Zee News
    37 Boca Raton (Florida): US President Barack Obama on Monday warned Iran that the "clock is ticking away" as his Republican challenger Mitt Romney vowed a harder line to prevent Tehran from going nuclear during the last of the three high-stake...

Images

 >
 

More From Allvoices

Related People

Report Your News Got a similar story?
Add it to the network!

Or add related content to this report

 
Tap_logo_330_110_event
 


Use of this site is governed by our Terms of Use Agreement and Privacy Policy.

© Allvoices, Inc 2008-2013. All rights reserved.