Political candidates: How are you going to help the poor, disabled and elderly in America?
Linkedin

Political candidates: How are you going to help the poor, disabled and elderly in America?

Monticello : KY : USA | Oct 11, 2012 at 8:05 AM PDT
XX XX
Views: Pending
 
Personal Finance: Can I Apply For Food Stamps If I Receive SSI For A Child In California ??

I don't wish to be singled out by the media and don't want my identity known. Please respect my views as an anonymous disabled American citizen.

Now, that being said, how would each of these candidates handle the 50 million people on government aid? We are 50 million votes. Which candidate is going to bring down the cost of living?

I am disabled and receive SSI disability; it is my only income, and the maximum anyone can receive (in the state of Kentucky) is $698 per person per month.

I pay out $200 per month rent, average $100 to $120 electric per month, $14 per month trash service, with a yearly monthly average of $50 per month for home propane, $46 per month for a phone, $73 per month for auto insurance, $115 per month for an auto loan, plus household cleaning supplies, personal cleaning supplies, maintenance for auto, and gasoline for auto, OTC meds, etc.

This is not enough to go around for basic necessities. I am grateful for every penny of this check, but we can't make ends meet. Yes, I receive food stamps, and every penny of it goes to the grocery store each month and will only decently feed us about 20 days of the month, leaving 10 days of the month eating dry beans and potatoes. I am unable to work and have many multiple serious health conditions. What about us?

If we make $25 dollars in any month, we are penalized by SSI and by food stamps; they take that much from each, so what good does it do us to try to make it? The harder we try, the more we are penalized, making it impossible for us to help ourselves and try to improve our life. We are not allowed over $2,000 in resources above a home and one vehicle. Twenty years ago, a $2,000 dollar vehicle for a spare would be a decent back up vehicle, nowadays a $2,000 dollar vehicle for backup would be one that didn't run. We can't win.

And it's not just those of us who are disabled; it's also the poor and the elderly as well. I am usually lucky if I have $100 to spare to try to get my household needs and personal needs and gasoline and such. A hundred dollars alone won't fill me up and give me another tank of gasoline a month, let alone anything else. We can't even afford one tank of gas to do us for the month to go to the doctors, pharmacies, grocery stores, etc.

It's not the millionaires who need a tax break, it's the poor who need a break. Instead of giving so many millions to countries that are not even our allies, countries that turn on America over things like a movie, that money should have gone to Social Security to help the American citizens, to improve American lives. Which of these candidates is going to really start to care about the poor, the disabled and the elderly? What is their stand on Social Security, SSI disability and food stamps?

We are grateful for what we receive, but we struggle each and every month, not only with our disabilities and medical needs (as if that wasn't enough), but with trying to live, trying to stay alive and not starve, keeping a roof over our heads, trying to have transportation and gasoline. Trying to afford to keep ourselves and our homes clean. I guess you want us all homeless and dirty with signs in our hands on the highways reading "Please help us we are in need of food" or "Will work for food" or "Can we take a bath in your home?"

This nation is headed toward seeing 50 million people begging for help along the roads if these issues are not addressed. We are not bums, and yet we have become victims of the economy and the government. Just to clarify, I am not asking the government to give me more money. Who is going to lower the cost of living, lower the cost of gasoline, lower the cost of insurance, lower the cost of food, lower the cost of utilities, lower the cost of autos, etc.? Lower the cost of living in America, for even those working hard manual labor whom are making minimum wage or close to that are in the same boat as me, and we can't make ends meet financially just for basic living necessities. Which candidate is going to do this?

If you like to write about U.S. politics and Campaign 2012, enter "The American Pundit" competition. Allvoices is awarding four $250 prizes each month between now and November. These monthly winners earn eligibility for the $5,000 grand prize, to be awarded after the November election.

1 of 1
What about the poor?
When will political candidates begin addressing issues faced by the poor? (Image: Microsoft clip art)
hicks870 is based in Monticello, Kentucky, United States of America, and is a Stringer for Allvoices.
Report Credibility
 
  • Clear
  • Share:
  • Share
  • Clear
  • Clear
  • Clear
  • Clear
 
 
Advertisement
 
Posted By northsunm32 northsunm32 | 7 months ago
The poor do not seem to count for much this election. It is all about the middle class. Since the poor probably do not donate much money nor have many lobbyists, their problems will not be high on the political agenda.
Reply By hicks870 hicks870 | 7 months ago
No we don't seem to count for anything, they bring up healthcare, but not the other side of the healthcare, the nonmedical part. Not once i have heard any of them address this issue
Posted By itobin53 itobin53 | 7 months ago
What the govt needs to do if they are at all serious about helping struggling Americans would be to stop all the penalties on earnings that keep people poor. This is completely absurd.

At $800 a month, even if you could earn an extra $300, you would still be well below the poverty line. Why penalize to make sure the poor stay poor?

Making the rules more realistic would also cut down on fraud. If people are hungry they will do what's needed to survive. Too many parts of the safety net system have not been updated for 40 years. This is a classic example of govt. stupidity. 21st century America needs 21st century rules.

In the richest nation on earth there is no valid reason for any American to go hungry.

There are a lot of right wing fascists in this country that would call me names for believing that the govt should play a roll in helping the poor and disabled. I don't know why they seem to hate everyone who doesn't agree with them or have a pile of money in the bank, but if they took some time to see how others struggle, maybe they would understand that no human being should needlessly suffer if there is a way to help them up.
Posted By hicks870 hicks870 | 7 months ago
yes i agree, this nation wants to be the saviour of the world, but yet is so unfair to their own needy, these rules they have in place, makes it impossible for you to try to help yourself, because it sets you back more than it helps you. You can't win unless you hit the lottery then they'd take half for taxes. Did you know that SSI also has a rule, that you are not allowed to give away resource or sell a resource for less than it is worth, if you do, you loose gov't benefits for 36 months, so if you help your own child, you can loose your benefits, if you sell something for less than value, you can loose your benefits for 36 months, you can't own anything more than a home you live in and one vehicle, if you do, if the value is over $2000, you loose your benefits. If something is only valued at $2000, it isn't much, you don't own much of anything and aren't allowed to.
A lawyer will tell you, that Social Security makes their own rules.
The gov't should of gave some of those millions to Social Security and cut back on spreading wealth around the globe. I am not saying not to help other countries, but there should be more of a balance to it. Social Security was designed so people can make it when they are old, sick, etc. This nation is in debt a trillion dollars,, and we can help financially with this country and that country, but won't help our own system. Something wrong with this picture.
Posted By hicks870 hicks870 | 7 months ago
as i expected, they talked about the medical side of Social Security Medicare & SSI Medicaid, they touched on it, but they did not speak one word about the other side of the nonmedical part. Just to say Social Security is going bankrupt, well if they can save all these nations,save the auto industries and save the banks and etc etc. Why don't they save the second most critical thing in america, next to jobs, i think that is first, but this should definitely be second on the agenda. This is 50 million people struggling to survive for the most basic needs of life.
Posted By hicks870 hicks870 | 7 months ago
Social Security doesn't need to be privatized, it needs to be updated to todays times with realistic terms for people on it, and people whom are on it, need to be on it for real reasons, giving SSI to people whom are homeless, drug addicts and alcholics are not reasons to receive SSI unless you have real physical disabilities like cihorisis of tthe liver or something, but those basicly healthy shouldn't receive it, people whom smoke cigarettes don't receive it till they get lung cancer or something like that, same should be for drug addicts and alcoholics. It is a choice they are making, and it leads to physical health problems but till it does, this is not the program for them. Update Social Security and SSI to today's times, to do what it is intended to do. For they are great programs being abused not only by those whom really shouldn't be on it, but also by the Social Security administration with ridiculous rules where people can't try to help or improve their lives without the risk of loosing the aid. Update social security and ssi, dont' privatize, if it takes a stimulous package or a bailout then do it, but go over the internal workings of it, make it better, make it where people can try to accomplish getting to where they don't need it, or need it less in time, and those that will always need it, don't penalize them for what adds up to be no more than little amounts, it is not with the 21st century on its figures for it's rules. There would be less lieing and more honesty, people wouldn't have to resort to deceit, and lies. There just trying to make it in this world and survive. We are human and we do appreciate, but keeping the rules to where we can't try to improve our lives is wrong. Update Not privatize.
Advertisement
 

More From Allvoices

Report Your News Got a similar story?
Add it to the network!

Or add related content to this report

 
Tap_logo_330_110_event
 


Use of this site is governed by our Terms of Use Agreement and Privacy Policy.

© Allvoices, Inc 2008-2013. All rights reserved.