In a debate with challenger Elizabeth Warren, Massachusetts Sen. Scott Brown (R-Mass.) has declared that she is “clearly” not Native American – even though, on occasion, she has claimed to be of Cherokee extraction. Interestingly, nobody asked the good senator whether he thought Professor Warren was red, white, black, brown, or just off-white. He didn’t need to be asked. Just look at her, he implies. She’s simply too “white” to be “red.”
Brown has been sinking like a rock in the most recent polls. Prior to Willard Mitt Romney’s "47 percent" implosion, Brown had a relatively comfortable lead over Warren. But free-falling poll numbers have strange and mysterious effects on political egos. Again, before Romney declared on that secret video that he “would have had a better shot” at winning the election had he been born Mexican, no one had ever publicly accused Brown of racism – white, red, or otherwise. He’d never given anyone reason to believe he might be a closet Ku Kluxer.
“Clearly she is not” a Native American, according to Brown, who must consider himself an ultimate arbiter of “racial” identity here in the polyglot known as the United States of America. White people, white men in particular, have been addressing, adjudicating, giving definition, borders and boundaries to the meaning of whiteness, of blackness, of browness, of yellowness – of otherness – since they first set foot on these shores some 500-plus years ago.
So Brown’s unsolicited advice and declaration are nothing new. What’s new is that he would stoop to, once again, and delve into the never-out-of-date Republican Party racial playbook, but this time with a twist. It’s not blacks or browns singled out as “special” or “different,” you see. It’s the original – the real – Americans who must be addressed once more.
Brown’s own high-ranking staffers certainly got the message. Five of them subsequently interrupted a rally for Warren with hand chopping gestures and war whoops that were once staged by characters in old black and white “Western” movies. The head of the Cherokee Nation called them and their actions "downright racist."
Brown's response? A statement on Wednesday “regretting” the “unacceptable” behavior.
No apology here, right? And now, Brown has actually doubled down on the red racist tip. He’s offered a television ad which leaves no doubt about his position on Warren, race, racism, red people, etc.
Jacqueline Pata is executive director of the National Congress of American Indians. She noted that Native Americans (the first Americans) are “the last Americans to secure our rightful place at the ballot box.” She worries over whether those Indians who show up at the ballot box will have the proper tribal identification cards, since 20,000 years of residence in-country does not matter to folk like Brown and his Tea Party cohorts.
Finally, Brown’s injection of race into this race is as obvious, blatant, and mean-spirited as anything I’ve seen come out of Mississippi or Louisiana over the last 50 years. He is telling the “low information” white voter in Massachusetts that Warren has not only used the dreaded “affirmative action” card to get into Harvard and other plum normally white-reserved stations in life. But she has used it “illegally” because she really is not red, she’s white. Just look at her.
He is playing on and even stoking white racial resentment at affirmative action, and at the gall of some white women to even challenge such an accomplished man as Brown.
Fortunately, for Massachusetts and America, it’s not working. Should she win….when Warren wins, America will have turned another corner toward real justice.
If you like to write about U.S. politics and Campaign 2012, enter "The American Pundit" competition. Allvoices is awarding four $250 prizes each month between now and November. These monthly winners earn eligibility for the $5,000 grand prize, to be awarded after the November election.
References:
Or add related content to this report
News Stories | Blogs | Images | Videos | Comments
Ironically, the issue of Warren's heritage was probably a net-plus for Brown until this latest ugliness. But whether Warren of full-blooded European descent or has a bit of Cherokee blood, too, Brown's tone toward this whole thing makes him look less like a John McCain (who denounced such things) and more like an old school Jesse Helms.
Deputy Chief of Staff Greg Casey
GOP Operative Brad Garnett
Constituent Service Counsel Jack Richard
State Director Jerry McDermott
Special Assistant Jennifer Franks”
Brown is making such a big deal out of this and all it's doing is making him look like a racist jerk who has no real issues to talk about that aren't offensive attacks.
In this context Sen. Brown's comment can be seen to reference the reasonable conclusion that she is not Cherokee.Or it can be viewed as in inartful dig.Or you can feign false outrage at his racist attitude.
Sen. Brown,who according to a Rasmussen poll released this week is tied at 48% with Ms. Warren, held a rally last weekend where 50+ Union members supporting Warren surrounded a half dozen Brown supporters outside an event and prompted a sophomoric response from the Brown people,including two low level staffers.Again the fiegned outrage was excessive.
Contrary to the author's claim,there is no "injection of race...like that coming out of Miss. or La."into the campaign.Only hysterical responses to foolish antics that shield Ms. Warren from having to explain herself and legitiimate questions about her character.
I recognize that from the disance of Chicago the author's self-righteous observations seem cutting.From here in Mass. they seem delerious.
Warren has admitted as much. She says that that is what she has been told all her life...by her parents. And so she believes it. So what? Perhaps she is not Native American in any sense of the term. I really don't care. What I do care about are her ideas for moving this country forward.
As to my "screed" and "delerious" writing style and approach to life in "these United States," just keep reading. And I am not falsely "outraged." I am genuinely outraged. But I see a lot of hope lately, a lot of possibility in people like the professor. She may disappoint us all, but that's okay, too. We will just keep trying until we get it right.
Oh, and by the way, Chicago is not on the other side of the world. It's less than two hours from Boston -- as the crow flies. And some of us here in this most degenerate of degenerate cities, do get out on occasion.
Thanks for reading.
Peace,
HD
The Netherlands and Belgium are just as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.
Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.
What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?
How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?
And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?
But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.
They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.
Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.
Three words: Slavery, Colonialism, Capitalism. Oh, sorry, one more: History.