Ricken Patel of the organization 'Avaaz.org' he makes me arrive their last campaign: Request to Newsweek that stops the confrontation!
In the mail in Spanish, he speaks of what we should know on: the 'Anger Islamist'.
According to this mail, in an acquaintance it has American it shows what we take seeing two weeks: the screams of the Muslim world against western. All this began with a video islamophobe of '13 minutes.'
In the mail you leave Newsweek, their cover with the Muslim anger, and to the side the images of the satire of the blog Gawker. He has made a great satire of this hysteria mediática. He offers some alternative images of the Muslim anger.
But that that more he gets me the carefulness they are their 7 points. With these points of view, they want from Avaaz.org, to clarify, what seems is escaped, on this topic. They consider them very important and I want them to know them:
"According to the first estimations, in the protests against the film have participated among a 0.001 and a 0.007% of those1.500 millions of Muslims of the world - a very small part in comparison with those who protested in favor of the democracy in the Arab Spring.
The great majority of the protests has been peaceful. The assaults to the foreign embassies have almost been all organized ones or impelled by members of the movement salafists, an unit radical islamista that looks for to weaken to other sectors moderate more popular islamistas.
Lybian and American officials of high range are shown in disagreement regarding the possibility that the American ambassador's murder in Libya was something drifted ahead of time so that it coincided with September 11, in which case it would not be connected with the video of the discord.
Apart from the attacks on the part of militant radical units in Libya and Afghanistan, a study of the news generated during September 20 suggested that those that united to the protests had not killed to neither a single person.
Practically all the more outstanding leaders, so much Muslim as western, they have condemned the video, and practically all the leaders, Muslims and western, they have condemned any act of violence that can be made in answer.
During the visit of Pope to Lebanon, in the most algid point in the pressures, leaders of Hezbolá attended the papal ceremony, abstaining from protesting for the video while the visit lasted, and they even called to the religious allowance.
After the attack that put an end to the American ambassador's life, ordinary people left to the streets in Bengasi and in Trípoli with pancartas, many of them in English, apologizing for the attack and saying that the violence doesn't represent them neither to them neither its religion."
In this mail of Avaaz, they are asked a question: 'Muslim anger' or Strategy Salafi?
This video of so tragic consequences, found it and it diffused for Egyptian television. September 8: 'Sheikh Khaled Abdallah'. This presenter is Salafi.
He discovered video "Innocence of Muslims", but not according with their discovery, that diffused with subtitles by extremist salafists, followers of a radical Islamic movement that receives support from Saudia Arabia.
Now then, most of the Muslims that they were offended by the video, or him to ignore it or they protested peacefully. The salafists, on the other hand, began to shake their black flags. Leaders of Party Egyptian Salafists went to the protest in Cairo that like we will remember term with the assault to the embassy of the United States. It is question of being asked the same question, but adding: What is it won with it?