Journalists' role in US presidential polls
Linkedin

Journalists' role in US presidential polls

Manila : Philippines | Sep 22, 2012 at 12:41 AM PDT
XX XX
Views: Pending
 

As recorder of events, every journalist covering the presidential marathon to the White House has to bear in mind that he/she has a major role to play: to ferret out the truth in a non-partisan way using his/her potent weapon --- the pen.

It’s a fact that journalists have the right to information. But they should be aware at this point in time that by exercising this special privilege they are also facing two possible choices: To destroy or to protect what has been built by traditional politicians.

Such is the case with writing. Journalists can create new scenarios, tear down what exists, or keep the things the way they are. It’s all up to them.

We keep hearing from seasoned journalists that corruption exists during elections, especially in the third world countries. Allegations of cheating also crop up and no one knows who really won. One case in point is the 1985 snap presidential elections in the Philippines, where the late president Ferdinand Marcos was accused to have cheated his closest rival, Corazon Aquino, that led to a peaceful people power revolt in February 1986. The revolt finally ended the 20-year dictatorial regime.

More often than not, results of the elections do not depend on the platforms of candidates or their qualifications, but rather on how much money, gifts or favors the candidates give the voters. And sometimes, candidates not qualified to run won for being popular and moneyed.

According to an Allvoices contributor from India, American politics is a multi-million dollar enterprise. We could not argue with him. While a report in huffingtonpost.com indicates that the 2012 US election campaign would cost nearly $7-billion with the White House as the prize at stake, unemployment is still high, poverty is still pervasive. To win the votes of the electorate, candidates usually choose these two topics as favorite subjects in their campaign speeches.

The U.S. presidential campaign is nearing to a close. While most of the Americans remain undecided as to whom they would cast their votes for president on Nov. 6, more questions are cropping up: Should I vote or not? Whom should I vote for? Should I go for President Barack Obama or Mitt Romney?

These are only some of the many questions that journalists should answer by painting a vivid picture of what these candidates have done in the past. As recorder of political and social events, they should also tell the people to cast their votes to make the U.S. government a better one.

If you like to write about U.S. politics and Campaign 2012, enter "The American Pundit" competition. Allvoices is awarding four $250 prizes each month between now and November. These monthly winners earn eligibility for the $5,000 grand prize, to be awarded after the November election.

1 of 1
President Obama
President Obama on ABC (Image: Reuters/ABC News' Robin Roberts/Handout)
omeroscar is based in Manila, National Capital Region, Philippines, and is a Reporter for Allvoices.
Report Credibility
 
  • Clear
  • Share:
  • Share
  • Clear
  • Clear
  • Clear
  • Clear
 
 
Advertisement
 
Posted By albertacowpoke Karl Gotthardt | 8 months ago
I agree journalists have a big role to play, but they shouldn't let it get to their head. Objectivity should be the name of the game, regardless of their political persuasion. Good report.
Reply By omeroscar omeroscar | 8 months ago
Thank you for agreeing what I believe. My article was just an opinion based on my personal point of view both as a journalist and a voter.
Posted By jinkinpark jinkinpark | 8 months ago
A very informative report. Rated up and keep up the good work.
Reply By omeroscar omeroscar | 8 months ago
Thank you for your nice comment.
Posted By johnmariow johnmariow | 8 months ago
Excellent reporting. I agree that journalists should reveal the truth about candidates. But in this 2012 election, I think emotions are too intense for objectivity.
Reply By omeroscar omeroscar | 8 months ago
I agree when you speak of objectivity. Thank you.
Reply By omeroscar omeroscar | 8 months ago
I agree when you speak of objectivity. Thank you.
Posted By joycesingha joycesingha | 8 months ago
Good report and one of the very few which stay impartial. It's a shame that most of our media cannot report like this. No harm in expressing an opinion but those tend to get out of control.
Reply By omeroscar omeroscar | 8 months ago
Thank you, Joyce, for your interesting comment. Yes some opinions sometimes are expressed out of control.
Advertisement
 

News Stories

 
  • Philippines to air Marcos martial law speech

    Inquirer.net
    The Philippine Daily Express, then a tabloid, announces the declaration of martial law on Sept. 21, 1972. PhilippinesThe Philippines for the first time in 40 years is to air Sunday the late dictator Ferdinand Marcos' full television broadcast...
  • AP Exclusive: Neglect ruins Marcos' prized shoes

    SF Gate
    Philippines (AP) Termites, storms and neglect have damaged part of former Philippine first lady Imelda Marcos' legendary stash of shoes and other vanity possessions, left behind after she and her dictator husband were driven into U.S. exile by a 1986...
  • Mould over dictator's shoes: Philippines neglects Marcos' memorabilia

    Russia Today
    Human rights activists in Egypt have called on Saudi Arabia to release an Egyptian woman sentenced to five years in prison and 500 lashes. Wedding designer Naglaa Wafa was found guilty following a business dispute with a princess...The shoes once...

Images

 >
 
  • President Obama on ABC (Image: Reuters/ABC News' Robin Roberts/Handout)

    President Obama

More From Allvoices

Related People

Report Your News Got a similar story?
Add it to the network!

Or add related content to this report

 
Tap_logo_330_110_event
 


Use of this site is governed by our Terms of Use Agreement and Privacy Policy.

© Allvoices, Inc 2008-2013. All rights reserved.