
9/3/2012
WASHINGTON - Labor unions have a long and colorful history in America. Often demonized by corporate special interests, unions have historically been the voice of the under-represented working man (and more recently, woman) in the fight for fair and ethical treatment of workers.
This morning's Washington Journal presented the case for and against the continued viablity of labor unions in America. The guests were Mark Mix, National Right to Work Legal Defense president, and Mike Williams, the Florida American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organization president.
Mix, contrary to caller comments and perception, didn't appear to be against the organization of labor unions.
"There has been, there is, and there will be a place for workers organizing voluntarily," Mix said.
According to Mix, organized labor unions as they are currently defined by federal law have too much authority in the states in which they are allowed to operate. Compulsory unionism, the ability of unions to force non-members to join a labor organization as a condition of employment at work sites, is the issue.
"Since 1935, federal law has permitted unions to suggest that certain workers be fired for failure to pay dues or union fees," Mix said, even if these workers were not members of their local union.
Facing a 10-year decline of about 1.5 million workers in nationwide union membership, Florida AFL-CIO president Williams spoke to the continued need for labor unions in America.
After a peak membership of about 33% nationwide during the 1950s, currently only about 12% of public sector workers are members of a labor organization, according to Washington Times reporter Patrice Hill.
"Many dropped out of unions because they no longer have a job. You can't participate in union business if you don't have a job," Williams told a caller.
Despite the decline in membership, most American workers, (51%) see unions as positively effecting working conditions for all American workers (non-union and union) and 53% believe unions have a positive effect on covered workers salaries and benefits, according to a Pew Research center survey from 2011.
However, this same suvey found that, overall, only about 45% of workers hold a favorable view of unions, and more than 40% held an overall unfavorable view of unions.
Williams went on to say that the "rich and elite" want a non-existent middle class, voicing his concern about some of the budget and policy prosposals presented by Republican nominees for president and vice president, Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan, respectively.
"The Romney-Ryan ticket is trying to reinstitute the policies from 12 years ago that we are still suffering from today. Do we want that? I say the answer is no," Williams said.
Scott Ross, executive director of One Wisconsin Now, reiterated this view.
"Ryan and Romney want to slash taxes on the rich...(and) starve education funding and leave us (America) with a compromised infrastructure," he said via Skype.
If you like to write about U.S. politics and Campaign 2012, enter "The American Pundit" competition. Allvoices is awarding four $250 prizes each month between now and November. These monthly winners earn eligibility for the $5,000 grand prize, to be awarded after the November election.
Written by Benjamin Burton Jr.
Or add related content to this report
News Stories | Blogs | Images | Videos | Comments
That was clearly demonstrated by the Japanese by sending better cars, better steel and better electronics to the US shores. Unfortunately, the militants in the unions were blinded to the truth of what is to come. The only sensible union head of all time is Doug Fraser of the UAW, who realized that we are all in it together. But he was pushed aside by the militants.
Listen, companies need to make money to keep jobs. They also need to keep money in the bank to survive the hard times (not just individuals have hard times). When greedy union leaders fan anger amongst the membership everytime the company starts to accumulate some cash and start asking for unreasonable raises or strike the company is suicidal.
I never said that was right. Here is the problem.
The entrepreneur that started the business pass on the the next generation who keeps it status quote. Then the third generation decided they are better off enjoying the fruit of the elders. So, they hire 'professional managers' that does not share the vision of the founder, and since they are the hired hands they benefit from paying the unions more. For every dollar he/she will give to the union they will pocket $100 or $1000 more, it's not their money.
Look at Wall St. and all the big corporations, which or them is still run by the family that started them. On top of that America has pushed God out of every aspect of her life. The only source of America's moral value was shut out of the higher education and by extension the corporate world.
I was fortunate to have started working at a time there was still some social responsibility left then.