The Romney campaign plans to ramp up their attacks on President Obama at the GOP convention in Tampa, Florida, and beyond. But is that the best way to get voters, especially women, to like Mitt Romney?
Romney has had some poll numbers haunting him since his bid for the White House began. If he can't turn them around, even voter ID laws aimed at stopping Democrats from voting and the Koch brother's generous campaign donations may not be enough to get him to the White House.
Romney has poor likability numbers. And he trails Obama badly among women voters, 50-42, in a recent Gallup poll.
Women make up about half of the electorate and a Romney victory is unlikely unless he can woo women voters.
However, despite what the Republican propaganda machine is trying to sell, women are not buying it. This may be a classic case of actions speaking louder than words, since women's rights and health care issues have been under assault by the GOP since Republicans took over the House in 2010.
The latest blemish on the GOP image came last week, when Republican U.S. Senate candidate Todd Akin announced that women who had a "legitimate rape" could defy medical science and produce a special sperm-killing bodily function that prevented pregnancy. The suggestion was quickly debunked by the New York Times and the legitimate medical community as complete fantasy. But the GOP continues to try to find ways to redefine rape in order to justify outlawing abortion.
Still, the Akin "legitimate rape" controversy has highlighted some core concerns among mainstream Americans with Tea Party philosophy.
Unsupported claims are making the GOP look more and more like a party desperate enough to do whatever it takes to grab power, including defy science, mislead voters, and even outright lie in campaign ads.
Former Republican congressman Joe Scarborough, co-host of the MSNBC show Morning Joe, slammed Romney last week for running a "completely false" ad against President Obama on welfare reform.
"I've been looking for a week-and-a-half to try to figure out the basis of this welfare reform ad," Scarborough said on air. "I've scoured the Wall Street Journal editorial pages … the ad's completely false. It's just completely false."
In addition to a sharp turn to the right to shore-up support among radical right-wing Republicans, lying in political ads is not helping Romney's image. Add to that his unprecedented defense of keeping his tax returns secret and you have a candidate struggling to get his favorable poll numbers up.
The Romney campaign seems to think that if they just lie more, that will be enough to win the White House. It might work, since a lot of voters believe everything they see in negative ads whether they are proven false or not. However, some issues could be impenetrible.
The wild card remains female voters, who may fall for Romney false advertising on other issues, but may never trust a Republican to stop the current movement to allow government control over the outcome of pregnancies by forcing raped women to have children.
Women won the right to choose abortion from the Supreme Court in the Roe v Wade decision of 1973. Republicans are now trying to take that right away by blocking abortion rights on state-by-state basis.
Romney's unfavorable polling problems also seem to revolve around a general view that he is out of touch with average voters. This is the candidate that is installing a car elevator in one of his many homes, has a Swiss bank account, and told a group of college students to go "ask their parents for money" if Republicans followed through on their plans to end government support for education programs.
During his years as CEO of Bain Capital, Romney made decisions that shipped American jobs overseas, and closed the doors on businesses, stripping workers of jobs and health insurance. Romney calls that a "sucessful" business career. But those who were on the receiving end of Romney's venture capital profit-driven schemes have different views.
In a time when too many Americans are struggling, Romney has done little to dispel his image as an out of touch millionaire, who is essentially a candidate that will increase taxes on most Americans, while cutting them for the rich.
Apart from his 56% unfavorable rating among the general electorate, even the Romney team knows that winning the White House is not likely to happen without support from female voters.
If you like to write about U.S. politics and Campaign 2012, enter "The American Pundit" competition. Allvoices is awarding four $250 prizes each month between now and November. These monthly winners earn eligibility for the $5,000 grand prize, to be awarded after the November election.
Or add related content to this report
News Stories | Blogs | Images | Videos | Comments
GOOGLE: "OBAMA'S WAR: WOMEN, THE BIGGEST LOSERS UNDER OBAMANOMICS"
The War on Women is indeed real and in that article you can read why. What cannot be denied is the Party that is waging that war, the party that had removed all opportunity from women and the African-American Community, impoverishing them both.
They have become the 99 percenters as the income equality of Third World nations have been imported to the United States as our jobs have been exported to the Third World.
‘If you don’t have any fresh ideas, then you use stale tactics to scare voters.” BARACK OBAMA said in 2008, “if you don’t have a record to run on, then you paint your opponent as someone people should run from.’
This from a man who's wife said in 2008:
"Speaking in Milwaukee, Wisconsin today, would-be First Lady Michelle Obama said, "for the first time in my adult life I am proud of my country."
Michelle was not proud of her country when George Bush ENDED the War in Iraq that Bill Clinton had started.
TRUTH of FICTION: DID THE MEDIA REPORT THAT US WON THE WAR IN IRAQ?
http://www.truthorfiction.com/rumors/v/victory-ignored.htm
BILL CLINTON SIGNS IRAQI LIBERATION ACT OF 1998 AND PUTS LOGISTICS INTO PLACE TO INVADE IRAQ:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ygQVyznw2zE
ALL DEMOCRATS IN CONGRESS SIGNED THE ACT, MAKING THE INVASION AMERICAN LAW. CLINTON ALSO INVADED BOSNIA BECAUSE HE WAS THE PEACE PRESIDENT WHO BELIEVED THAT STRENGTH ADVANCES AMERICA'S INTEREST AND WORLD PEACE:
YOU CAN HEAR HIS WORDS - Copy and Paste the links above into browser bar.
Since iTobin porbably told you the exact opposite above, what makes you believe anything she says today?
Is is because women don't lie? Valerie Plame didn't lie?
Sandra Fluke, an Obama operative didn't lie about her $3000 condom habit that I now have to pay for?
iTobin in another article of hers tried to link Romney to another politician's dumb remark about rape and abortion, sinking to a new low in her usual narratives. Romney had NOTHING to do with that remark, and neither has his party.
In fact, if it hadn't been for Romney's party's votes PASSING the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Democrats would have defeated it! Google the votes - TEST ME OUT! Now you know the Democrats have been lying to you!
Mitt Romney with a large family is no more against women than iTobin. THE WAR ON WOMEN is an invention of MEDIA MATTERS, THINK PROGRESS, and SPECIFICALLY Huffington Post, from whom iTobin gets her talking points ON A DAILY BASIS. Here's the Huff Po article from which she rewrote hers above:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/23/mitt-romney-women-voters-poll_n_1825728.html
The truth of course, is that in polls of likely voters, among women Romney and the Incumbent are VERY close.
To suggest Romney's statements as LIES, and the re--writing of Obama's RECORD as truths, is the height of hypocrisy.
Paul Ryan's critics and the architects of ObamaCare reveal their real vision for health care: COERCION.
FOR OBAMA THERE WILL BE NO WAR ON WOMEN...
EVEN IF THE WOMEN CAN'T FIND AN OBSTETRICIAN...OR A GY...THANKS TO OBAMACARE:
WALL STREET JOURNAL - read on:
Cheesecake Factory Medicine
The liberal assault on Paul Ryan's Medicare reform has often been ugly, but that's not to say it hasn't been instructive. While ripping Mr. Ryan, ObamaCare's intellectual architects have been laying out in more detail their own vision for the future of American health care. It's a vision that all Americans should know about before they go to the polls in November.
It doesn't take a mythical childhood metaphor to mock this theory. Mr. Orszag's style of central planning—in what was already the heaviest regulated U.S. industry before ObamaCare—has failed over and over again in Medicare since the creation of the fiat pricing fee schedule in the 1980s.
Thanks to ObamaCare, Cheesecake Factory medicine is already becoming a reality. Irving Levin Associates, a research firm that tracks health-care mergers and acquisitions, reports that M&A hit $61.2 billion in the second quarter and the highest annual levels since the 1990s. Three of five hospitals now belong to a parent company's network, while more than half of physicians are employed by hospitals or systems, not independent practitioners.
On the insurer side, too, incumbents are demolishing their smaller rivals. Aetna is buying Coventry Health Care, a company that administers Medicare and Medicaid benefits, for $5.6 billion. WellPoint made the same play in acquiring Amerigroup for $5 billion in July, while last October Cigna laid out $3.8 billion for HealthSpring.
This bureaucratization will amplify everything patients and businesses despise about the current system: the unintelligible $103,234.61 bill for a turned ankle, the doctor who can't take a phone call because of how the hospital schedules shift.
Why aren't mom's eight specialists aware of each other's existence? Why is health care mostly conducted via a pad and pen, and beepers and fax machines, in the iPhone era?
Paul Ryan's insight is that health care would work better if patients were controlling their own dollars. His reform accepts the fact that health, disease and treatment are usually complex, individual and unpredictable, not commodities that can and should be reduced to protocols, metrics, algorithms.
A murderer's row of liberal health-care gurus—Zeke Emanuel, Neera Tanden, Don Berwick, David Cutler, Uwe Reinhardt, Steve Shortell, Mr. Orszag, many others—recently acknowledged as much in the New England Journal of Medicine. They conceded that "health costs remain a major challenge" despite ObamaCare. That would have been nice to know in, oh, 2009 or 2010.
These political choices will be unpopular and even deadly, which is why Mr. Orszag worked so hard to insulate his payment board from oversight or accountability. Congress can only reject the board's decisions if it substitutes something else that reduces costs by as much. More amazing still, only a minority of the board can be "directly involved" in the provision of health care.
This latter provision is supposed to prevent the alleged conflicts of interest that come from knowing something about how health care is provided in the real world. What it reveals instead is that this board isn't about medical quality at all. It is purely a balance-sheet exercise to make sure that the Orszag-Obama agenda of top-down health care can't be undone by something as crude as democratic consent.
And they claim that Paul Ryan's proposal is "radical"?
Between voter suppression and Koch brothers money, this year looks more like a terrorist take over of the govt than a fair election. Romney and Ryan are creeps who want to force their radical fascist rule on people who don't want it and they have to rig the election to do it. How sad that the GOP is so Hell-bent on destroying American freedom.
From your above comments:
PIGS, MEN ARE PIGS
VOTER SUPPRESSION
TERRORIST TAKEOVER OF GOVERNMENT
ROMNEY AND RYAN ARE CREEPS
THEY ARE RADICAL FASCISTS
THEY ARE RIGGING ELECTIONS
THE GOP IS HELL-BENT ON DESTROYING AMERICAN FREEDOM
Interesting statements with absolutely no evidence to back them with the exception of HATE, BILE, ENVY and RESENTMENT that comes bleeding through with your every word.
iTobin, you are hateful, spiteful, RADICAL, men-hating, and FREEDOM hating. Pretty much all the things you accuse the other side of the political spectrum of being.
Coercion of the Democrats, the way ObamaCare was passed - by COERCION, in the middle of the night, locking out the loyal opposition from the debates - by threats and spiteful penalties is where the Democrats, using your words: are hell-bent on destroying American Freedom.
As THE WALL STREET JOURNAL wrote:
Paul Ryan's critics and the architects of ObamaCare reveal their real vision for health care: coercion.
HERE's the article LINK:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10000872396390444358404577605233123916096.html?mod=WSJ_Opinion_LEADTop
It is important for people to see EXACTLY what you are saying and from where you opinions come from.
It is important for people to understand the depth of depravity of you views, expressed by your words.
We thank you for enlightening us all.
No iTobin, MEN are NOT Pigs. We are NOT creeps. We are not interested in rigging elections or subjugating women. We are not interested in DESTROYING AMERICAN FREEDOM.
In fact, we are interested in the exact opposite.
We have wives, sisters, mothers, cousins who are women and we ARE concerned with their welfare and well-being.
That is why people reading this should GOOGLE:
OBAMA'S WAR: WOMEN, THE BIGGEST LOSERS UNDER OBAMACARE
LASTLY, I HAD COPIED THIS ENTIRE PAGE FOR FUTURE REFERENCE.