Have you received your email from Paul Ryan yet? I have, and he literally begs me to “Help Us Prove Rachel Maddow WRONG!”
It seems the MSNBC TV host’s nightly expose of Republican electoral shenanigans and downright wrongdoing are having an affect on the Romney-Ryan campaign. And so it should be.
Please recall that in the recent past, Democrats and “libruls” had basically conceded the airwaves, both radio and television, to the so-called conservatives. For reasons beyond the scope of this article, they just did not answer, let alone fight back, at the constant, unrelenting barrage of Republican, right wing, “conservative” propaganda spewed all over our living room floors and automobile carpets, morning, noon and night.
How apropos it is that the real left wing counterweight to Rush Limbaugh turns out to be a nearly six-foot tall, gay white woman, who is so glib and articulate that her homosexuality, her whiteness and femininity matter not one whit when one hears her cold logic and incisive reasoning. And, okay, unlike Limbaugh, she also comes across as a genuinely nice and likeable person.
I first became aware of Maddow when she hosted “The Rachel Maddow Show” on the now defunct radio network Air America. Her sharp, edgey intelligence was hard to miss. Her well-spoken sincerity came right through the radio, sat down next to me, looked me in the eye, and said exactly what I had been thinking all the time.
Limbaugh is known for telling his “dittohead” followers, “If you don’t know what to think, I’ll tell you.” Well, it’s not that bad with Rachel and me. But I do admire her chutzpa, her intelligence, her ability to cut through the crap and tell it like it is. (Limbaugh, by the way, has never graduated from anybody’s college. Rachel, on the other hand, has a Ph.D. -- in philosophy -- from Oxford. Yes, that Oxford, the one in England).
More from my new friend Paul’s email:
“Friends, do we ever need your help? This week liberal MSNBC host, Rachel Maddow, has been on a campaign to smear and discredit Congressman Paul Ryan.”
We get it, Paul.
The smearing and discrediting of Paul Ryan cannot be tolerated. He is the new golden boy of the Republican Party. Favorable comparisons with St. Ronald Regan are being made among Republican stalwarts. So for a lesbian talk show host to denigrate our all-man, “All American,” budding Ronald Reagan redux, well….you gotta send him some money to fight this...this thing.
More Ryan email wisdom:
“She began by proclaiming [my] selection to be the Republican Vice Presidential candidate a ‘baffling’ choice that would lead the Republican ticket to defeat. She then set out and did everything she could to make her prediction come true. She was featured on "Meet The Press" where she accused [me] of promoting "voodoo economics.”
See, this is the problem with Republicans. They don’t read, or conveniently mis-remember, their own history and propaganda. Rachel is merely quoting St. Ronald Reagan’s own vice president, when as a presidential candidate in the primaries against St. Reagan, he called St. Reagan’s economic mumbo jumbo exactly what it was and remains: “voodoo economics." His name?….are you ready… George Herbert Walker Bush. When St. Reagan later tapped him to be his running mate, GHWB suddenly saw the light and supply side, trickle-down economic theory became as sacred as the Holy Grail. That obviously misguided theory has had us all in an economic and political trickbag since 1981.
So Maddow should be proud of the job she is doing. She is making these people aware that we are aware of their constant lies, obfuscations, misdirections, coded language, race and gender-based approach to social and economic policy and practice. Maddow has shown us that distortions of the truth with Republicans is, indeed, second nature. They don’t even have to think about it any more. They just do it.
We should be proud of her. She is doing what most Democrats have been too often too cowed to do: Call these people out for who and what they are.
Thank you, Dr. Rachel Maddow.
If you like to write about U.S. politics and Campaign 2012, enter "The American Pundit" competition. Allvoices is awarding four $250 prizes each month between now and November. These monthly winners earn eligibility for the $5,000 grand prize, to be awarded after the November election.
RESOURCES:
http://us.mg6.mail.yahoo.com/neo/launch?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:I
http://www.theprogressiveprofessor.com/?
http://www.investopedia.com/terms/v/vood
Or add related content to this report
News Stories | Blogs | Images | Videos | Comments
and HERE: http://riverdaughter.files.wordpress.com/2008/08/news006.jpg
HERE: http://riverdaughter.files.wordpress.com/2008/08/barack_stadium.jpg
I'VE JUST GIVEN YOU absolute proof that Obama is a narcissistic megalomaniac. That is what you've asked for by denying the obvious. But that was not enough.
How about Election Night when The Man, building an edifice for his GodHood, decided that a common stage with family and associates and common Americans was not enough, so he had built for himself a GREEK TEMPLE from which he will rule the world.
HERE: http://riverdaughter.files.wordpress.com/2008/08/stadium_large.jpg
I've never been on the lunar landscape, thank you. And if you're going to quote the great Rhinestone Cowboy, I'll have to excuse myself to go barf. I'll pause just long enough to point out that it's too bad he never practiced what he preached.
Obama Marks Neil Armstrong’s Passing With a Picture of Himself
How would you expect the narcissistic Megalomaniac in Chief to mark the passing of Neil Armstrong if not with a photo of himself? From the Obama/Biden campaign’s Tumblr page:
See the picture of the MEGALOMANIAC NARCISSIST HERE:
REF: http://moonbattery.com/?p=16487
"We must put an end to the arrogance of a federal establishment which accepts no blame for our condition, cannot be relied upon to give us a fair estimate of our situation and utterly refuses to live within its means. ... We must force the entire federal bureaucracy to live in the real world of reduced spending, streamlined function and accountability to the people it serves." --Ronald Reagan
Thanks for reading/commenting.
Are you hinting at some sort of discrimination?
I enjoy a classic show where hosts still sit down. Maybe she just wears her jeans or does not feel to follow the general trend where hosts have to stand to be listen to.
Sheer stupidity, what next will they float in the air?
It is what she says, reflects on and uncovers that always has my attention.
She should be the next VP and would make a fab job of it. Or why not run for President in four years?
What the GOP is trying to pull off is so despicable and low flying that even the flies on the cow dung can't stand it.
CNN and MSNBC are slowly twisting in the wind as FOX picks up their former viewers; so has Maddow's former employer, Air America, gone belly up for following the narrative of ignorance that the relatively astute people of America reject.
It is not inconceivable that Maddow's viewership, like Keith Olbermann's. mostly includes family members and close friends. And not much else.
It isn't a surprise then for many on the political left to discover that they have been, unknowingly to themselves, inducted into a cult. As liberalism of the modern variety is really a secular religion, with its own meeting places, marketing programs, dogmas, scriptures and high priests.
Rachel Maddow is a very likeable person, bright, and in many ways far better suited to comment on political matters that her predecessors who were arguably mad as the participants in a cock fight.
Regardless, she is getting talking points directly from the White House - and this is common knowledge, I don't have to prove it. So has Fareed Zakaria of CNN and TIME. Fareed has been dismissed from both organizations because of flagrant plagiarism, he a man who commanded $75,000 per speech to organizations. Does the speaker's fee prove that Fareed was correct about any issue? You see the logical fallacy here, don't you?
The high priests regularly disappear into the intellectual wild and those of us left think: There'd go I if not for the GRACE of G-d.
I like Rachel. Too bad she will soon follow her predecessors. As has Fareed on CNN, Olbermann, and Michael Moore, from whom we haven't heard lately have we? Well, maybe he'll do us a favor and fabricate another crockumentary for our amusement, eh?