Aug. 8, 2012
Any marketing major worth his or her federally subsidized student loan will tell you that the value of a campaign slogan is directly proportional to the ability of the masses to unequivocally understand the intended message. And the shorter, the better.
In the case of “Romney Hood,” a made-to-order made-up word President Obama used during a campaign speech Monday in Stamford, Conn., the many perceived weaknesses of Mitt Romney’s disconnect from middle America are distilled for all to recognize and ruminate upon in a matter of three syllables.
“He’d ask the middle class to pay more in taxes so that he could give another $250,000 tax cut to people making more than $3 million a year. It’s like Robin Hood in reverse,” ABC News quoted Obama as saying to the Stamford faithful. “It’s Romney Hood.”
Everyone gets this. It falls under the rubric of “instant recognition” and reenforces the portrait of Romney as greedy fat cat before those who hear it even have to think about what they just heard. We all know about Robin Hood, who famously stole from the rich to give to the poor. Guys like Robin Hood aren’t that popular with the so-called “One Percent,” but they’re generally pretty well-received by the vast majority of would-be voters.
Romney tried some moniker maneuvers of his own during a Tuesday interview on Fox News. “We’ve been watching the president say a lot of things about me and about my policies. They’re just not right. If I were to coin a term it would be ‘Obamaloney.’ He’s serving up a dish which is just simply in contradiction of the truth.”
OK, so “Obamaloney" is kind of funny. It rolls off the tongue without too much effort, and if you’re a conservative, you’ll want to apply it to everything Obama says or does. But it falls short of “Romney Hood” on many levels. “Romney Hood” condenses one particular Romney quality into a self-contained phrase that addresses why Romney's tax policies would be unfair to most Americans as president. People who hear the phrase “Romney Hood” ruminate on a big, bad rich guy taking their hard-earned dollars away so his rich pals can have a bigger share of the riches.
“Obamaloney” is sort of a B-level, all-purpose insult, not nearly as good of a zinger as “Romney Hood” and certainly not as pointed in its ramifications. Where “Obamaloney” might get readers or viewers to snicker or smile, “Romney Hood” packs a punch. It plants seeds of doubt about the presumptive GOP nominee’s tax proposals in voters’ minds even before they have time to tune out what the president is saying.
Look for Obama and his surrogates to use it again on select occasions between now and Election Day. That’s not to say Romney won’t use “Obamaloney” again; he probably will. But Romney will just look like someone saying a funny word over and over while Obama will come across like a guy who knows how to sum up his opponent so fast that everything else becomes one long-winded supporting argument. For those voters prone to tuning out the campaign, “Romney Hood” encourages them to do exactly that. It tells them all they need to know about the former governor of Massachusetts and how he feels about “the little guy.” By the end of the election, it will likely be a full-blown meme, referred to in history books as a successful line of attack by the incumbent against his Republican challenger.
I’m not sure what this tells us about the collective attention span of the electorate, but it definitely tells us that Team Obama knows how to make the most out of Romney’s name. Unless Romney can come up with something better than “Obamaloney,” he’s not going to win this particular war of the words.
If you like to write about U.S. politics and Campaign 2012, enter "The American Pundit" competition. Allvoices is awarding four $250 prizes each month between now and November. These monthly winners earn eligibility for the $5,000 grand prize, to be awarded after the November election.
SOURCES:
Vote 2012: ‘Romney Hood’ vs. ‘Obamaloney,’ ABC News, Aug. 7, 2012
Romney tax plan is 'Robin Hood in reverse,' Reuters, Aug. 7, 2012
Or add related content to this report
News Stories | Blogs | Images | Videos | Comments
Actually your comment above makes a good point. Either both campaigns take the elector for dumb, something that could be wrapped up in a book "Politics for Dummies". Add to that the latest ad "Romney Girl", and you have to ask where the collective intellectual level of the electorate is.
Americans are about to embark on the most important election in their lifetime, where the type of country will be defined for the future and this is what it boils down to? Scary thought.
It certainly doesn't say a lot for voters, when you look at what originates from both campaigns. Instead of calling it Election 2012, let's call it comedy hour in America.
Well said. It is a comedy, but is a tragicomedy because there are so many important issues that could be debated. Instead, the candidates resort to clever (and "Romney Hood" is clever, no doubt about it) to make points with the voters.
We've still got three months to go, so brace yourself.
It's a double edge sword though, like you point out, the American electorate wants an instant analysis without having to do the work of their own investigation in order to make an informed choice. It takes a considerable amount of thought to know which candidate represents your interests, and letting someone else do the thinking is, alas, an easy but lazy way to vote.