
Nothing seems to be too low when it comes to discrediting presidential hopeful Mitt Romney. Over the past few months we have seen reiterations of Romney's time at Bain Capital and the claim that he hasn't paid taxes for ten years. To add insult to injury, Obama's Super Pac, Priorites USA is now claiming that Mitt Romney is responsible for the death of a woman after Bain Capital closed a factory.
The Obama campaign seems confident that Florida Senator Marc Rubio will be Romney's choice as Vice President. The director of Obama for America in Florida, Ashley Walker, send out an e-mail soliciting dirt on the Senator.
“Share what you think the rest of the country should know about what Rubio’s really done in Florida, the good, bad and ugly. And why he’d be a disaster as our next vice president,” the e-mail said.
The latest Rasmussen presidential tracking poll has President Obama at 46% and Mitt Romney at 45% nationwide. This is basically a statistical tie. Nonetheless Rasmussen's Electoral College Scoreboard shows the President at 247 and Romney at 206 with 85 votes a toss up. The majority of toss up votes are in states that President Obama won in 2008 and include Florida, Colorado, Iowa, Wisconsin, Ohio and Virginia. It should be no surprise then that the Obama Campaign and its SuperPac are pushing hard to discredit Mitt Romney and any prospective VP candidate. To this point, Romney has been painted as filthy rich, has been accused of not paying taxes for ten years and in the latest attempt is being accused of being responsible for the death of a woman. In a one minute video, Priorities USA brings back former GST Steel employee Joe Soptic, a laid-off plant worker, who was used earlier in the Obama campaign. Soptic initially blamed Mitt Romney for losing his job, but now he blames Romney for the death of his wife. Soptic claims that his wife kept her distress from cancer to herself. He thinks that she knew that they couldn't afford health insurance because of the plant closure, thanks to Mitt Romney. The problem with that charge is that Mitt Romney left Bain Capital in 1989 and GST Steel was closed in 1991. Regardless are we now to hold Presidents or CEO responsible for health issues after certain plants are closed or when workers are laid off? When the heated battles went on last November over the raising of the debt ceiling, the President appealed for civility in debates and reiterated it again after the Gaby Gifford shooting. In the army we had what we called "Leadership by Example". If you talk the talk you need to walk the walk. While all is fair in love and war or presidential election campaigns, one should be able to expect some decency and honesty when it comes to over the top allegations. Regardless of where you stand on Romney's release of tax returns, allegations by anonymous or alleging that candidates are responsible for deaths should be out of bounds. Of course, the best dirt is yet to come. You have to love those spin machines.
Or add related content to this report
News Stories | Blogs | Images | Videos | Comments
There are millions of Americans with loss of health insurance stories--including me. So Soptic's story is one of possibly thousands citing someone died because of loss of insurance, which is the important story.
So as Romney campaigns against the Affordable Care Act in an attempt to dump the burden totally onto the states that cannot afford it, stories like this will continue with or without a push from the Obama campaign. People who have lost a loved one, don't need a political campaign to share their suffering.
How affordable the "AHA" is remains to be seen. From my understanding a lot of low income people will be pushed on Medicaid and the latest I read today, is that one of three doctors will not accept Medicaid patients.
It would have taken courage to introduce universal health care and the opportunity was, in fact, there during the first two years of the Obama Administration.
In my mind these tactics, which fail to address the real issues, go beyond the pale.
Part of the supreme court ruling is that state's do not have to expand Medicaid as outlined in the Affordable Care Act. If the state's opt out or later drop Medicaid, then uncompensated care--people showing up in the ER--is paid for by cost shifting to the insured. This is similar to giving the states the option to set up exchanges, except with Medicaid the Feds will not come in with Medicaid like they will with setting up insurance exchanges.
It's estimated 6 million people could be effected by not having access to Medicaid in their state. It doesn't matter if docs won't accept these people because once they reach the ER it is the hospital's responsibility to treat them--usually a lot sicker than if they have had a primary care physician or an urgent care center early in an illness.
Someone has to pay for the sick in this country, and if doctors want to be part of the problem by refusing Medicaid patients, they will have to live with that decision. Hospitals can put some pressure in local communities to encourage docs to accept sick people, and also hospitals will be benefiting from over 35 million insured people coming to their hospital for care. It behooves hospitals and physicians to work together to care for community.
We have some experience with ER care associated costs in Canada. That's why I keep saying that universal health care was the only option if you are to go full bore on a government mandated health insurance program.
I sincerely hope it works for you, but I have my doubts. Look at your ERs now.
"It's estimated 6 million people could be effected by not having access to Medicaid in their state. It doesn't matter if docs won't accept these people because once they reach the ER it is the hospital's responsibility to treat them--usually a lot sicker than if they have had a primary care physician or an urgent care center early in an illness. "
Somehow I think a lot more than 6 million will be affected. I think it's disgraceful for the most powerful nation in the world.
That's why all the bickering on side issues should stop and both campaigns should concentrate on the issues that distinguish them. Show the electorate some beef. How are the incumbent and the aspirer going to solve America's problems? Anything else is hogwash or as we say in Alberta "BS"
In defense of ER treatment, I don't believe it is second rate. ER teams and docs are highly skilled and efficient. The problem is people wait until they are very ill to seek care, which puts both them and the ER teams at a disadvantage in treating illnesses in far advanced stages, rather than early intervention which is less costly and effective for the patient.