The AFP/Fox News plus other media reported on 5 August 2012 on the Nature Medicine journal study describing how "CHEMOTHERAPY CAN BACKFIRE AND BOOST CANCER GROWTH ."The actual journal study had more than a half dozen co-authors , but the lead researcher was Dr. Peter Nelson of the USA at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle . although the media, especially FoxNews Studio B with Sheppard Smith made the study sound as if it were breaking news , the facts are otherwise .Reports of CHEMO increasing tumour growth and causing cancer are relatively old news , and studies date back to circa 2000 . Go to Wikipedia and look up WNT 16 and all the old dates for its role in oncogenesis (causing cancer ).
As with much of the cancer industry media events , there are a number of flaws that are over looked or down played. one could suggest that the cancer industry is trying to buy time to continue to use chemo to profit from guaranteed sales even though people suffer and die. A special example was the FoxNews interview with Dr.whose expertise is in the NYU Div. of Medical Ethics : a cancer medicine ethics expert. Dr.Caplan said patients had asked if they should continue with chemotherapy since it causes cancer or speeds it up ? A good question , especially since I have been cancer free since 1997 having turned down chemo/radiation and applied my own (peer reviewed by M.D.Anderson Cancer Center ) black listed cancer theories so NIH felony fraud could covered up by the University of Waterloo ,Canada ( see www.cancerfraudbadbiotech.com for details ) . So you can see that I am angry and know about the propaganda spread by the cancer research /funding industry : in fact, chemo is now on the verge of being QUACKERY ! Dr. Caplan said he thought it was ethical to tell people to keep taking CHEMO as there were no realistically alternatives yet available . My difficulty with ETHICISTS ( I don't know Dr.Caplan ) in general is that they are never tested by the public for any track record and are allowed to offer expert opinions as though they are better than anyone else . Opinions are not a scientific fact, they are just feelings on a given subject. What are your feelings for the American league pennant winner this year ? What do the facts say who will win the pennant race ? What I wish to illustrate is that the cancer industry/ researchers hide from critical review of themselves . Am I qualified to ask critical questions of the cancer industry ? Lets ask Dr.Caplan ( and any other ethicist ) to answer questions that will cause President Obama to call a Grand Jury investigation of Dr.Douglas Wright and the Unniversity of Waterloo for federal felony fraud (see www.cancerfraudbadbiotech.com for details ): 1. Is research described by federal documents as feces, excellent ? Y/N ? 2. Is lying for federal money felony fraud ? Y/N ? These questions are directly relevant because the cancer industry/researchers have hidden from them so they could continue to do research and receive monies for outdated theories , and people are allowed to die of cancer .
WHAT DID DR NELSON et al FIND ?
They found that chemo can help cancer cells to spread ,that chemo damages the DNA of healthy cells around the tumours allowing them to release a protein that protects the tumour , and helps to develop a resistance to further treatments. They had set out to find why cells that would die in the lab proved to be so resilent in the human body .They found (to them ) the completely UNEXPECTED result that chemo boosted cancer growth!!!!!!!They had tested the effects of a type of chemo on prostate tissue from men with cancer to find evidence of DNA damage in the healthy cells after the treatment . They ALSO found similar results with BREAST and OVARIAN cancer tumours !!!!!Therefore, this is proven to be a general chemo effect !!!!
The chemotherapy is supposed to stop the cancer by INHIBITING the reproduction of the fast dividing tumour cells in cancers. Basicaly, chemo is a poison that kills the tumour cells. They found that healthy cells DAMAGED by chemo secreted more of a protein called WNT16b which boosted the cancer cell survival .Nelson said this was completely unexpected , with the secretion taken up by the tumour cells causing growth of the tumour ( N.B.,tissue organ growth promoted as it should under "normal situation, EAG ) and the tumour invaded more tissue and became resistant to subsequent treatments. Dr.Nelson doesn't understand , and for 25 years my theories have been suppressed , but there are simple explanations which could save lives .you really should help me continue the research if you want to make cancer history.
Nelson , said in cancer treatment tumours often rspond well to early treatment , followed by rapid growth, then with subsequent resistance to treatment. He also said that rates of tumour cell reproduction have been shown to ACCELERATE between treatments . Their results indicate that damage responses in BENIGN cells may directly contribute to enhanced tumour growth kinetics . He said the results paves the way for research into new and improved treatment , suggesting the use of an anti body ( N.B., dangerous mistake , EAG )to WNT16B given with chemo which MAY (the famous "may") improve the response and kill the tumour ; or it "may" be possible to use smaller less toxic therapy .
Basically,Dr. Nelson has shown that chemo causes cancer, and MORE IMPORTANTLY , most cancer researchers don't have a clue to what cancer is , or what they are REALLY DOING !!!!!and, you , the public , let them get away with QUACKERY !
I will make a complicated topic short ( in the works a long definition of cancer to followin another article ) : cancer is NOT a disease , it is a medical condition triggered by external causes .Smoking causes cancer.Radiation causes cancer. Chemicals cause cancer ,and ,so chemotherapy is proven to cause cancer .
So what is cancer ? Cancer is damaged DNA re activating genetic/embryonic sequences without apoptosis and immune system coordinated controls all occuring at the wrong time resulting in abnormal uncontrolled tissue growth.Tissue growth without command function . More complicated, but in brief.
I originaly worked with ovaries and luteal cells (published in Endocrinology ), and these cells secrete hormones to maintian pregnancy etc.they have function and a predetermined lifespan and a death command. When another pregnancy ocurs the luteal cell tissue regrow and repeat the patern /sequence .They are programmed by GENES to do so and respond to protein commands . From this , I proposed the CELL DEATH SIGNAL GENE THEORY that was reviewed by M.D.Anderson Cancer Center .I was then black listed by the University of Waterloo , Canada, to cover up NIH fraud .Felony fraud stopped cancer research : documented fact . Cell Death Signal Gene foretold the DICER and BAX genes which are part of Programmed Cell Death (PCD) that are accepted proven theories today.
To make an even longer story short, look up WNT 16 on wikipedia and see this is a family of strucutraly related genes that encode secreted signalling proteins .These proteins have been implicated in cancer/oncogenesis , developental processes including Cell Death , and driving embryogenesis . Long story short, tumours are trying to be a hormone secreting body sending out WTN16 proteins to sustain the tumuor just like luteal cells sustained themselves while they were required to in pregnancy .The big problem is that unlike true functioning organs with a controlled predetermined duration , a tumour has NO function and no predetermined time limit , and will continue to grow endlessly, not unlike a car engine without a governor that is running at full throttle. Tumours have no shut off switch . and it is because a tumour believes it is a proper organ it can use all the proper defences to protect it self .and these are the defences to ward off chemo , and remein alive and functioning (though it doesn't have a true function ) In fact , chemo continues to damage healthy tissue /DNA, and we get an effect like pouring gasoline on a fire . What we need to fight cancer are the shut off switch proteins etc : as first proposed by the Cell Death Signal Gene Theory 25 years ago. And the body will heal itself.
In my own research I found not only the coordination of the cell Death genes were required but also coordination with the immune system and the recognition of ERVs (endogenous retro viruses ) .So there is more than one pathway that needs to be controlled .I found the chemicals in herbs could function to do what was required : one example, tumeric is reported by many researchers to stop tumour growth. Therefore, I believe that there are better and safer ways to treat cancer than chemo, and people do not have to die.
Note that Dr. Nelson said he thought that using an antibody against WNT16 and chemo could be a treatment .Given all that I have explained , you should see that this is a BAD idea. WNT16 has healthy functions in the rest of the body,so if you use antibodies , then you will be harming the rest of the body.Bad idea. In fact it could kill the patient!
I am alive and cancer free and need help to continue the research, but please do not ask me to treat you.The best I can do is refer you to the Goldman Philanthropic Group who sponsored others. There were several herbs used, and I can not say what quantitties, what duration and what combinations are the correct ones.Only the research could prove those answers. I have been blocked from finding that answer for 25 years so fraud could be covered up. I would like help to undo the harm. I do not believe anyone has to die of cancer .Thank you.E.A.Greenhalgh