China has reacted strongly to Mitt Romney’s statement that Jerusalem is the capital of Israel, saying the U.S. Republican presidential candidates careless statement could deteriorate the already edgy situation in the Middle East or even trigger a new war between Israel and Palestine because the later also considers Jerusalem its holy capital.
According to latest observations by the Chinese government’s Xinhua News Agency, Mitt Romney’s “hawkish remarks” overlooked the sensitive nature of Jerusalem. The news agency further said that the Republican’s statement ignored Palestine’s claim over the city, which was occupied by Israel in a 1976 war. Moreover, the international community does not recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel, China asserted.
During his recent visit to Israel, Romney, who has earlier displeased Beijing by warning to take harsh actions against China in trade quarrels if the people of America vote him to the White House, declared Jerusalem as the capital of the Jewish state besides pledging to defend Israel in any situation. He also sent tougher signal to Tehran by promising to stop Iran from developing nuclear weapons.
Romney also indicated in his speech that he was ready to break with U.S. policy dating to 1967 by shifting the U.S Embassy to Jerusalem if the Israeli government wished so. The China Post criticized Romney’s indication of moving the U.S. Embassy to Jerusalem.
“My understanding is the policy of our nation has been a desire to move our embassy ultimately to the capital (Jerusalem),” Romney said, according to the China Post. “I would only want to do so and to select the timing in accordance with the government of Israel.”
Palestinian authorities retained diplomatic calmness during Romney's recent tour to the region, even as the presidential contender cuddled Israeli position and in a clear cold-shoulder, kept away from meeting with Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas.
It is pertinent to mention here that the United State is the principal negotiator in the hard diplomatic works — stalled since 2008 — to establish a Palestinian state via table talks with Israel. Therefore, Palestinian authorities do not want to irritate major players, including Romney.
“At the end of the day, the U.S. has interests in this region, it has embassies in 57 Arab and Muslim countries,” said Saeb Erekat, an Abbas aide, according to JTA. “I don't think they will sacrifice everything for such statements, mere disturbing statements that will strengthen extremists in the region.”
Or add related content to this report
News Stories | Blogs | Images | Videos | Comments
Jerusalem is the capital of Jerusalem.
Since Israel was destroyed by the Romans, too many people have died to keep Jerusalem a holy city, devoid of ownership even though it has bounced around the owners circle a few times.
There are too many religions that call Jerusalem their home base. It's one of those real touchy things you want to walk softly around.
Here's a real good article written on the Haaretz website expressing Israeli emotion on the issue: http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/opinion/israel-should-give-up-jerusalem-as-its-capital-1.2718
"This comment is not a reflection on how the Chinese feel about it. I could care less. I might add: the shrapnel in my body is from a mortar round made in China" ~ moonstroller
In regards to Israel and the Palestinians, there is a real need for Israel and the Palestinians to sit at the same table and look into each other's eyes and come up with the two state solution. Will it be easy? No it will require hard work by both sides, but it has to start someplace.
Tough talk by China doesn't interest me as long as they permit Syria to continue killing its people and make special deals with Iran for their oil. No credibility there.
Romney in my opinion should have just restated US policy. IMHO the remainder was not necessary.
The president of Israel, President Shimon Peres, has stated for the record that President Obama has given unprecedented support to Israel since he has been in office. That is to say more support than any other president before him.
You can watch his speech here:
http://www.barackobama.com/truth-team/entry/israeli-leaders-on-the-presidents-support-for-israel-more-than-anything-i-c?source=primary-nav
It should be noted that President Obama has committed himself to the establishment of a Palestinian State on the pre-1967 lines.