Pipeline politics in Canada: national energy strategy
Linkedin

Pipeline politics in Canada: national energy strategy

Lunenburg : Canada | Jul 28, 2012 at 7:29 AM PDT
XX XX
Views: Pending
 

There has been a heated spat between British Columbia Premier Christie Clark and Alberta's Premier Alison Redford. The dispute started when Christie Clark paid a call on Redford to outline her conditions for the Northern Gateway pipeline, before going public.

Christie went public this week, prior to the Premier's Summit in Lunenburg, NS with her conditions:

1. Completing the environmental review process with a recommendation by the National Energy Board that the project proceed.

2. Deploying world leading marine oil spill response for the delicate BC coast line

3. Using world leading land spill response and prevention.

4. Addressing legal requirements of Aboriginal and treaty rights.

5. Ensuring that BC receives a fair share of the fiscal and economic benefits. At present B.C. only gets eight percent of the pipeline revenue.

While most of the demands appear reasonable, the fifth point is a point of contention, which Redford feels to be a change in the terms of confederation for the free movement of goods and services across provinicial borders.

Without naming what a fair share of fiscal and economic benefits would be, Clark insists if BC does not get its fair share, there will be "no pipeline." The pipeline is critical for moving Alberta crude oil to Asian markets.

After rejection of the XL Keystone pipeline by the Obama Administration, this has become a high priority for both the Federal and Alberta government.

As part of the Premier's Summit, a National Energy Strategy was on the agenda. This is when Clark really dug in her heels, walked out of the meeting, stating that there will be no National Energy Strategy discussed by BC until the five demands are met. She called for a meeting between the two Premiers and the Prime Minister. Redford on her part said that revenue sharing is not up for discussion as far as Alberta is concerned.

Another strategy discussed earlier this year was the reversal of a portion of Enbridge's No. 9 Line, which would deliver Alberta crude to Eastern markets for refining and assure more supply of domestic oil.

Enbridge applied for reversal of the 194 km line and the National Energy board has approved the request with some condtions.

Labour Minister Lisa Raitt welcomed the boards decision releasing a written statement:

"Energy is a matter of national importance and our government welcomes efforts to better utilize our immense energy assets for the benefit of all Canadians," the former natural resources minister said in a written statement Friday.

"Energy is key to supporting the standard of living and quality of life for all Canadians. Over the past five years, the oil and gas industry has contributed an average of $22 billion a year to government revenues ... to help pay for everything, from education and health care to roads and bridges," added Raitt. CBC

Christie Clark's Demands are a Non-Starter

Christie Clark's demands, for the most part, are already met with the ongoing Review Board that is examining the viability and risks involved with the construction of the pipeline. At the moment BC is projected to receive $6.7-billion in additional tax revenue from the pipeline. So the question now is what is a fair share? BC will have no costs should a spill occur. That would be a combined responsibility of the Federal government and Enbridge.

Presently land owners receive compensation for pipelines crossing their land for loss of use. Most of that compensation is negotiated between pipeline companies and the land owners. In addition there would be tax revenue from additional jobs created, both along the length of the pipeline and at the port at Kitimat, BC.

Native groups will be compensated for the portion of the pipeline that passes through their land.

While Clark's demands may be popular in BC, it has to be a non-starter in the interests of Alberta and Canada. As Premier Brad Wall of Saskatchewan points out, this is a thin edge of a very big wedge. He contends:

“This is the thin edge of a very big wedge … You can’t just say look we only want to do this in the case of bitumen. What about the rail transport of other minerals? Or perhaps … potentially dangerous chemicals that are manufactured in other parts of Canada and shipped across?” National Post

For Alison Redford, giving in to the demands of Clark would be political suicide in Alberta. Albertans remember the National Energy Program (NEP) introduced by the Prime Minister Trudeau. Anything that smells of the NEP would be seen of robbing Alberta of its resources.

While Christie Clark maintains this applies to this pipeline only, it it would be a dangerous precedent, as Brad Wall pointed out. It would open the flood gates for transport of any hazardous materials across provincial borders.

While the two Premiers are not talking at this point and Christie Clark digs in her heels, there is no doubt that a conversation has to take place at some point.

With Christie Clark facing a re-election battle next year, this may be good politics for the BC Premier, but it certainly it is not good for confederation or BC/Alberta relations. In the end, one can only hope that common sense will prevail.

1 of 1
Alison Redford and Christie Clark
The very public spat between Redford and Clark is a wedge issue for Canada
Karl Gotthardt is based in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, and is an Anchor on Allvoices.
Report Credibility
 
  • Clear
  • Share:
  • Share
  • Clear
  • Clear
  • Clear
  • Clear
 
 
 
Advertisement
 

News Stories

 
  • Leave Alberta out of B.C.’s pipeline demands: Redford

      The Globe and Mail
    Brigitte Bouvier/For The Globe and Mail. video video video It is expected that Ms. Clark, who is demanding her province receive its fair share for the risk it is taking in the pipeline going from Alberta to the B.C. port of Kitimat, will raise the...
  • Premiers summit sidetracked by pipeline row

      The Globe & Mail
    Brigitte Bouvier/For The Globe and Mail. video video video He did not want to get involved in other premiers' business but he had seen this script before. Mr. Charest, who spoke passionately about how interprovincial spats can play out, reminded his...
  • B.C. to pull out of energy plan: Clark

      Delhi News-Record
    Premier Christy Clark announced Friday her province won't take part in a national energy strategy until Alberta and the federal government agree to discuss her demands for the proposed Northern Gateway pipeline. "We need to start having the...
  • Opinion: The B.C. premier's Alberta shakedown

      Vancouver Sun
    With her demand that either Alberta or Ottawa ante up more cash before the proposed Northern gateway pipeline can proceed through parts of British Columbia, B.C. Premier Christy Clark is playing a risky and ill-advised game of economic chicken. But...
  • Opinion: Why B.C. and Alberta can't get along (but could)

      Vancouver Sun
    The current interprovincial spat over the Northern Gateway project is a portrait in miniature of two very different Wests, and of two premiers in different, but equally uncomfortable places...But an interprovincial deal in no way clears the way for...
  • B.C. Premier: Development, but not at any price

      The Globe & Mail
    Brigitte Bouvier/For The Globe and Mail. video video video British Columbia's five bottom lines are as follows: 1...In Enbridge's case, this means a recommendation by the Joint Review Panel that the project proceed...World-leading marine oil-spill...

Images

 >
 

More From Allvoices

Report Your News Got a similar story?
Add it to the network!

Or add related content to this report



Use of this site is governed by our Terms of Use Agreement and Privacy Policy.

© Allvoices, Inc. 2008-2014. All rights reserved. Powered by PulsePoint.