
The time has come for complete disclosure; to retain any real credibility, Mitt Romney must produce his tax returns for the last 10 years. With all the flak from the right about President Obama's lack of transparency, it's essential that Romney doesn't fall into that hole himself.
At this point, even conservatives have questions about those returns. They were given to John McCain, and McCain promptly chose Sarah Palin as his running mate in 2008. Was there something in the returns that points to either impropriety, or even the appearance of the same? Inquiring minds want to know.
Until he shares those returns with the rest of us, including the Obama campaign, we will have to wonder, and that kind of wondering does not engender support from your own party, or gain you any ground with the opposition. People need to know who they're voting for and who they're voting against.
In the case of Barack Obama, we may never know. His early life, and academic history is locked up tight in million dollars of legal actions, a veil which, to this point anyway, appears impenetrable. It's time for Romney to step up, and show us exactly who he is and let the cards fall where they may.
Romney will never establish himself as a front-runner in this race until he demonstrates the transparency in his own campaign that so many in the U.S. have found seriously lacking in Obama. Producing his tax returns with no further objections would show very clearly the difference between himself and the president, as well as demonstrating he truly does have nothing to hide.
In times when both parties accuse each other of obscuring the facts, I believe it is incumbent on all candidates to openly provide any information requested if it is even remotely applicable to the election.
People (at least in theory) need to know exactly who and what they're supporting. In response to the smoke and mirrors coming from the left, Republicans must produce real substance and answers to any reasonable questions or doubts. Failing this, they also fail to provide a tangible difference for voters to consider. Campaign promises rely on the faith that they will be honored.
Mitt has said he's cut from different cloth. If so, this is the time to show both his enemies and supporters that he will not shroud himself with mystery at a time when Americans have both a serious need and a vested right to know who he is and what he really stands for.
If you like to write about U.S. politics and Campaign 2012, enter "The American Pundit" competition. Allvoices is awarding four $250 prizes each month between now and November. These monthly winners earn eligibility for the $5,000 grand prize, to be awarded after the November election.
Or add related content to this report
News Stories | Blogs | Images | Videos | Comments
The sooner the debate gets to the real issues, economy, jobs and entitlements, the better off all will be.
Today's Rasmussen Poll on Economy
Voters view economic growth as much more important than economic fairness and think Mitt Romney favors growth while President Obama is more focused on fairness.
Sixty-two percent (62%) of Likely U.S. Voters consider encouraging economic growth as a more important role for the government than ensuring economic fairness. A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that just 30% of voters believe it’s more important for the government to ensure economic fairness.
Source: http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/general_politics/july_2012/62_put_economic_growth_ahead_of_economic_fairness
I agree; it's time to get off merry-go-round and cut to the issues. His big stick is the economy; it's time for him to use it. I think the argument that Romney should bargain with his tax returns to get more personal info from Obama is basically moot... it only intensifies the circus atmosphere, and in general, works to his detriment.
I think what's in the tax returns makes Romney unfit to be president. Even his wife said they were filled with questionable items. One of the first questions that comes to mind is his tax avoidance by keeping enormous sums of money offshore. The 1 tax return he did release shows he only paid 13% on $ millions - if not $ BILLIONS.
There are people in this country who make $20k a year and pay a higher percentage in taxes than Romney did in 2010. He is a master at manipulating the tax system to not contribute to the country that made him wealthy. What does that say about his character? To me it says he has no business in the WH and would make a horrible president - worse than G.W. Bush.
So my advice to Romney is to release the returns and see which the next trick is in the Obama Campaign box. We certainly wouldn't want to talk about the economy.
As an aside the top 1% pays 38% of all federal income tax and the top 10% pay 70%. that leaves 30% to the remainder of the country, while the bottom 50% only pay 3% of all federal income tax.
Source: http://blog.heritage.org/2012/01/29/chart-of-the-week-top-1-percent-paid-38-percent-of-taxes/
Since the bottom 50% are also the recipients of all entitlement programs, the question is how does the government fund them if not with the rich?
I don't know at what income level start paying taxes, but there is a deduction in Canada and also several tax credits. So to using the tax rate of a person making 20K as an example seems bogus and a false argument to me.
I think this culture of envy is destroying the US.
Yep... time to get to the substance...