
In June of this year, the ubiquitous gavel that was heard around the world fell on the passage of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) by the Supreme Court of the United States. Chief Justice John Roberts’ surprise defection to the other side of the political divide afforded “Obamacare” the 5-4 majority that ushered the bill in to law. The aftermath of the decision has left many walking through a minefield of hurling epithets, thrown out by the usual partisan punditry, now hyped on the crack of a clearly disputed presidential move made in an election year.
The rub, for the GOP at least, has been that despite the constant chatter of constitutionality, the horror of “it’s a tax!”, and the general harrumphing over that turncoat Roberts, the general public is, well, warming up to the legislation. It’s a done deal as far as many are concerned, so its time to move on.
But, wait! Not so fast. This is an election year, and this is President Obama’s single biggest achievement of his term. So, for the sake of Mitt Romney’s political life and possible future presidency, the ACA must be taken down or, at the very least, exposed for the over-arching, pie-in-sky, do-gooder piece of expensive nonsense that it is.
Leading the charge on this particular fight are the two Ricks: Gov. Rick Scott of Florida and Gov. Rick Perry of Texas. Their weapon of choice is to brandish the opt-out of expanding Medicaid mechanism that the Supreme Court allowed with the passage of the ACA. The two Ricks have said "hell no!" to expanding Medicaid.
Medicaid, established in 1965 though the federal Social Security Amendments, has been a shaky bastion of social service legislation that has provided health care for low-income families. As a program that is jointly funded by the federal and state governments, it is used to intense backlash by the states on issues of affordability and effectiveness. Backlash, however, does not mean that it is not a helpful program for many people.
Medicaid covers health and long-term care for 59 million people, most of whom would not be insured without it. According to the Kaiser Foundation, two-thirds of adult Medicaid recipients are women. Expansion of Medicaid under the ACA will go far in broadening the reach of health coverage for many lower-income women. This means greater access to breast cancer screenings, pre and post-natal maternity care, and general care for women.
Looking at the legacy of the two Ricks, its no wonder that they have taken the “hell no” approach to expanding Medicaid. Neither one of the Ricks have, to say the least, been very good at addressing women’s health concerns in any way that could denote any kind of sympathy or understanding of women in general. Perry earned the ire or women all over the country and was publicly and infamously mocked on his Facebook page earlier this year for his previous actions to cut Medicaid funding to healthcare clinics such as Planned Parenthood. This move threatened healthcare access for over 100,000 women in his state. Following close at his heels, Scott vetoed funding for rape crisis centers in his state, ironically, during Sexual Assault Awareness Month. As governor of a state where 1 in 9 women are raped and only 40% of women who are raped are believed to actually report the crime, Scott claimed he still couldn't come up with a definitive enough reason for allowing the funding to go through.
So, it is no wonder that the two Ricks would be so willing to throw women under the bus, yet again, to crow on about how the cost of the ACA expansion on Medicaid burdens the state and is a huge expansion of tax powers on the people exacted by the Democrats. The reality of the situation is that no one knows for sure what the true financial numbers will attest to in the years to come. Just like no one knew for sure in 1965. We're running off of figures right now and both sides are sticking to those that benefit their own cause.
And, for the GOP, that cause is to get their man elected by highlighting the untested financial burdens of a law that the other guy imposed. Rather than seek compromise or any discussion, the two Ricks has taken their stand against Medicaid expansion, and others are in the wings, ready to follow them. This is the face of the GOP in the health care fight in this election year - saying no to covering more people's health needs to stand their conservative ground.
And, at the end of the day, it's primarily the health of women we’re talking about here, so the Ricks don't have a sympathetic horse in the race to even worry about.
If you like writing about U.S. politics and the 2012 campaign, enter "The American Pundit" competition. Allvoices is awarding four $250 prizes each month between now and November. These monthly winners earn eligibility for the $5,000 grand prize, to be awarded after the November election.
Or add related content to this report
News Stories | Blogs | Images | Videos | Comments
Do you know the cost of purchasing a group policy for 350,000,000 members? Do your research and get back to me... I did mine.
If not, you can't make a credible statement. We need universal healthcare, but we need Obamacare like a hole in the head. It's nothing but 2000+ pages of pork, ideology and idiocy.
Needle away, we are all entitled to our opinions.
Everyone has opinions; everyone has a dog in the fight. Unfortunately, not everyone does their own research. The answers to the questions above are readily available. I found them with no problem and ran the numbers.
For any who may not be aware, our economy is at a tipping point. We can't just toss things up and hope for the best, which is what the entire Affordable Care Act does.
I supported the SCOTUS decision; even wrote a report on it and why it was the right decision.
I want universal health care, but I also know it can be done more effectively with capitalism than socialism because capitalism generates it's own money while socialism depends entirely on money taken from other things and people.
It's not the concept I oppose; I oppose the irresponsible manner in which it's been presented. It's not affordable; it's not universal; it's not maintainable in our current economic state and will only exacerbate the problems we have now.
So... are any answers forthcoming?
This is what America is becoming? A country that is so selfish it is socially and morally empty?
The GOP wants women barefoot and pregnant. I'm waiting for the word chauvinist to start making headlines again. Why not...they want to take us backward to the 19th century.
Please give me the name of 1 republican who has any ideas to ADD something to this country, instead of just being obsessed with undoing the progress of the last 200 years.
This has been the Democratic mantra for years and it's as much bullshit now as it ever was. Think about it. Republicans get old too... we have money problems, we have health problems, we have family who have exactly the same needs, so to say that they would happily throw old people out into the street is not only incredibly stupid, and totally illogical, but more than a little bit intellectually dishonest.
Democrats aren't the only ones who have elderly parents, health care issues, homeless issues, financial issues. Any one who actually thinks that way is delusional.
"Please give me the name of 1 republican who has any ideas to ADD something to this country, instead of just being obsessed with undoing the progress of the last 200 years."
Before I can answer that, I need to understand what you consider progress... anything based on capitalism, or profit will be rejected by you out of hand, because of your personal agenda. I can give you names, but you won't accept it because you are ideologically opposed to anything but the Progressive party line. I'd say you're acting like a lemming, but from more recent data, I'd say I'd be giving them a bad rap. They can actually act independently.
As for Rick Scott, Rick Perry, Bobby Jindal, Jan Brewer and that ilk...they are opportunists who see this as an opportunity to oppose Obama, no matter what the cost. I do not believe this is true of all Republicans at all, but the ones I have mentioned, I indeed do believe that they would throw any number of disenfranchised people under the bus to court big money and big press.