
The Washington Post (July 12, 2012) is reporting that a Washington, D.C. Police officer has made a “credible” threat to shoot First Lady Michelle Obama. The threat is considered credible because this particular officer, whose identity has not yet been revealed, has served as an armed motorcycle escort for Ms. Obama on a number of occasions.
The officer was not only over-heard making the threat, but also purportedly showed pictures of the weapon he intended to use via cell phone pictures.
The officer has been relieved of duty by the D.C. Police Department. D.C. police spokeswoman Gwendolyn Crump said: “We received an allegation that inappropriate comments were made. We are currently investigating the nature of those comments."
The Secret Service is taking the threat seriously, conducting its own investigation. Secret Service spokesman Edwin Donovan indicated that the agency would “take appropriate follow-up steps.”
This latest threat against the Obamas comes as no great surprise to people of a certain age, Baby Boomers in general, and black Baby Boomers in particular. Many of us were against President Obama's candidacy not because of any lack of qualifications or even policy differences. We remember clearly the turbulent 1960s, the Assassination Decade, when political leaders and social activists were almost routinely attacked, killed or grievously maimed. Here's a short (by no means exhaustive) list of some of those people:
June, 1963 – Medgar Evers, National Secretary, NAACP. Medgar Evers was shot down in his driveway in Mississippi for his indefatigable efforts to register black Mississippians to vote and for challenging the Jim Crow segregationist laws and practices of that state and the entire south. His was the first of a series of murders of men who fought to uplift black people out of the centuries-old oppression and suppression of the American apartheid state.
November, 1963 – John F. Kennedy, President. Even though I was only 14 when Kennedy was killed, I recognized that his murder was a turning point in this nation-state's history. He was only the third president to be killed while in office – following Lincoln and McKinley. Hardly any Americans at the time believed or accepted the “official” version of his assassination (lone wolf killer with communist sympathies).
1965 – Malcolm X, Nation of Islam Leader and defector therefrom. Malcolm was just coming into his own as a true national and international leader of disaffected black people, having severed all ties with the Nation of Islam and its mercurial leader Elijah Mohammad. The trial of his murderers revealed that it was, in fact, the Nation which had had him killed.
April, 1968 – Martin Luther King, Jr. Having been born in the deep south and witness to two lynchings of black men, my mother often wondered not if but when “they” would kill Dr. King. When it finally happened, I was on campus at Indiana University. I called her that night to commiserate our sorrow, anger and grief. Her only comment about the assassination: “I'm surprised it took 'em this long to get him.” Later in that same conversation, she advised me “to be especially careful down there” (southern Indiana where a new version of the Ku Klux Klan was resurgent).
June, 1968 – Robert F. Kennedy, Brother of JFK, former Attorney General and sitting Senator from New York. This one put a cap on the whole decade. It was pretty clear that had he lived he would have become president and changed the course of U.S. History – for the better. His whole agenda was about helping poor people; about continuing and reviving the legacy of both his brother and Dr. King. Ironically, he announced to an unknowing crowd of black people in Indianapolis on April 4, 1968, that Dr. King had been shot and killed. He also said in that speech that we must not hate our white brothers; that someday, perhaps in 40 years or so, he could envision that there might even be a black president.
Obviously, Robert Kennedy was prescient in his vision, for exactly 40 years later, the Age of Obama began. It's also clear that we may be on the verge of a new age of political terrorism. The hatred of Obama and all that he represents runs deep into the very soul of this country. There are those who have determined that his presence, his family's presence, in the White House is simply unacceptable and will do everything – anything – to remove the blot he represents on the “American” self-image.
If you like writing about U.S. politics and the 2012 campaign, enter "The American Pundit" competition. Allvoices is awarding four $250 prizes each month between now and November. These monthly winners earn eligibility for the $5,000 grand prize, to be awarded after the November election.
RESOURCES:
the griot.com
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baby_boomer
Or add related content to this report
News Stories | Blogs | Images | Videos | Comments
America is a divided nation firstly along two ideological lines. To disagree with President Obama's policies does not make a racist, just as it wasn't racist to disagree with President Bush. The notion is silly.
As a Canadian I cringe each time I see the voting blocks in the United States (Black, Hispanic, White, Women, Youth, Rich vs Poor, you get the point). I sincerely believe America needs to move on. Politicians need to stop putting statements out there that divide the public and raise emotions and that includes the President.
In my opinion the American public is being held hostage by those in Washington on all sides and the sheep happily fall into line.
The facts are that the economy is in the ditch. Unemployment is at 8.2% (14% in the African American Community, 11% Hispanic followed by youth and women). The real question is whether or not you believe that the policies in place are working.
It is also important to note that President Obama was elected with an overwhelming majority, which wouldn't have been possible without white votes.
I really think America needs to move on and get over the past without forgetting it. Much has changed in America since the 60s though.
I hope they can protect their children from this information. They will be incredibly scared by it.
I needed that.
First, if you really read this piece, you will note that I refer to the Baby Boomer generation, my generation, and what the 1960's (not the 70s --George Wallace, President Ford; not the 80s, Reagan; not the 90s....get it...the 1960s) meant and means to us. Don't want to pull rank on you three, but I doubt if you guys are old enough to remember that decade. You kinda had to be there to understand how "wild" things were. Reading about it, researching it, watching videos and documentaries only takes you so far. The whole atmosphere of this country was thick with intrigue on all levels. Think it was either Time or Newsweek who had a cover story describing America as a "Sick Society."
True, they haven't identifed the potential shooter as black, white, or otherwise. Doesn't matter. By the way, Malcolm X was killed by black men. RFK was killed by a "Middle Eastern" type. I can almost guarantee you, tho, had Michelle's guy been black, his picture would be all over the news and net by now.
As for the POTUS policies, seems to me you have a white male Republican Congress who has vowed to stop any progress whatever that this black president even tries to make. You mention jobs. They will not allow any type of jobs bill passed them because they fear it will make Obama look good.
As for white votes electing him....please. Obama did not receive a majority of white votes. What does that mean? Means that most white folks voted for the white guy. And they will do so again in November. Obama won by putting together a colaliton of "progressive" whites and most of the so-called minorities of America today. That also explains why, again, white Republicans are so desperate to repress, suppress those voters this time around.
Have a nice day.
Second the House of Representatives has only been in Republican hands since January 2011. Before that a completely Democratic Congress ruled the roost.
My point was that disagreeing with the President's policies does not a racist make. That makes for maybe good politics and that's about it.
A leader leads and looks for compromises. You don't get there by pitting one side against the other.
For over a year I have been trying to assist an African American woman in Chicago to get her soldier dad buried in Arlington. We did this with a story, a radio interview and tweets almost every day to the President, the White House, the First Lady, Senator Durban.
The man served in World War II under Patton. I know how African Americans were treated when they returned home from Europe. I would have thought that by now a man honoured with a Silver Star would have received the resting place he deserves. All her pleas have been left unanswered. Perhaps we should do something to help her if the politicians won't.
http://www.allvoices.com/contributed-news/12500941-requests-for-black-soldiers-arlington-burial-go-unanswered
They are still trying their best to obstruct and destroy their way to full control.A sorry bunch they are.
I appreciate what you're trying to do in Chicago...and am willing to help.
We believe in people of color, in their culture their accomplishments, and their myriad contributions to a very diverse society. Turning them, into victims who require somebody to save them is an insult to the memory of Martin Luther King...
I freakin' worshiped the man, both before he was murdered and after wards, when all his work was squabbled over by unworthy scum like Abernathy and Jackson like terriers with the body of a rat.
I observed, Resurrection City first hand,as well as the movement leaders who were now sitting pretty, and in the driver's seat, preaching hate, and vitriol.
Needless to say, that didn't make me very popular as a white teenager in Virginia, or as a child in Alabama, because I have a big mouth and I tend to say what I believe. I believe people of color are better than the poor victims you make them out to be. It diminishes every courageous thing they've done.
I guess we all know what happens when you assume... I'm gonna be 62 years old; I was in Ohio when JFK was killed, but almost immediately moved to the DC metro area; I was there when Martin Luther King was killed, as well as when Robert Kennedy was shot, through Resurrection City. I remember the lying bastard Jesse Jackson as he talked about how he cradled MLK's head in his arms as he lay dying... which was pure bullshit. I remember Ralph Abernathy taking a crap on everything MLK had accomplished and staying in a 10-room suite at the Washington Hilton during the occupation of Resurrection City.
I also lived in Montgomery, AL in 1959, and at 9 year old, horrified an adult visitor to our home when I told her people were people and should be treated that way... she just said, "honey... you don't understand...", but I understood perfectly.
I remember an incident on a public bus, when a huge white lady came on board, and immediately ordered an even larger lady of color to get up and move to the back of the bus. To her credit, the black lady stood her ground; I remember how proud and impressed I was with her determination.
I was raised to treat people for who they are, and what they do, nothing else. I spent some time as a child in Japan(after the Korean War), and have an adopted half-Japanese older sister.
I get it... I was there dude... I wasn't black, but I'm anything but stupid, or in denial. MLK was my greatest hero, waaaaaay above JFK or RFK. My only crime(in your context) is that I'm white... sorry... accident of nature.
You're clearly a highly intelligent man, and I think that if we ever discussed these things face to face, you might find the we see eye-to-eye on more things than you might think. I'm not an ideological thinker, but prefer pragmatic solutions.
I have nothing against Obama in relation to his race; my issues are strictly about his policies and my own personal research into what their effects are and will be. Personally, I think he's an inept, but charismatic slacker who feels he's entitled.
President Obama's and his administration, need to address such inhumanely behaviour and threats to use violence on ladies, is a violation. Whilst at the same time making it clear, there will be serious consequences, with severe sentences.
A President and his family should be held with great respect and should never be placed in such an inimical situation.
"As for the POTUS policies, seems to me you have a white male Republican Congress who has vowed to stop any progress whatever that this black president even tries to make. You mention jobs. They will not allow any type of jobs bill passed them because they fear it will make Obama look good."
The only permanent jobs(excluding contract work) the government can create are in the public sector, and that doesn't help the economy in any manner. If you want jobs, make it easier for small business to expand and hire more help. Give large business a reason to do the same, remembering that if they don't also increase their profit, they have no incentive to do so.
Such ludicrous, sophomoric views and act of employing sophistry in reasoning, seems most fallacious. It is not morally honest to say that Republicans are more suitable than the Democratic, for ruling America, especially as the leading candidate chooses to hide their cash resources in another country. Rather than invest it in America's economy. It is generous politics custom, to behave as paragons. Therefore, being aware of the situation, any reasonable minded person would agree it would not be feasible and helpful for that country’s economy, to vote them in Office, is much riskier.
That's exactly the problem... I don't want anyone "ruling" America, especially the Democratic party.
Do you actually understand anything about economics?