Texas Republicans want to repeal Voting Rights Act of 1965
Linkedin

Texas Republicans want to repeal Voting Rights Act of 1965

Austin : TX : USA | Jul 05, 2012 at 5:29 PM PDT
XX XX
Views: Pending
 

Amid the wave of new voter ID laws that have swept red states over the past two years, some Republicans want to take things a step further. In Texas, they want to repeal the Voting Rights Act of 1965.

As part of the 2012 Texas Republican Party platform, the Voting Rights Act of 1965 has been targeted for repeal.

The 22-page Texas Republican document states, "We urge that the Voter Rights Act of 1965 codified and updated in 1973 be repealed and not reauthorized," according to MSNBC.

In order to understand the gravity, and perhaps motivation of this GOP effort, a look at the reason the law was enacted in the first place can shed some light on the issue.

“Congress determined that the existing federal anti-discrimination laws were not sufficient to overcome the resistance by state officials to enforcement of the 15th Amendment. The legislative hearings showed that the Department of Justice's efforts to eliminate discriminatory election practices by litigation on a case-by-case basis had been unsuccessful in opening up the registration process; as soon as one discriminatory practice or procedure was proven to be unconstitutional and enjoined, a new one would be substituted in its place and litigation would have to commence anew,” according to the Department of Justice.

The 15th Amendment was ratified in 1870 because there was an abundance of state laws that discriminated against "black voting" by recently freed slaves. The former Confederate states had up to a million black voters who, although they now had the right to vote, still faced discriminatory voting practices, including poll taxes and literacy tests.

White supremacy groups, like the Ku Klux Klan and the Knights of the White Camellia, continued their efforts to stop freed slaves from voting through intimidation, sometimes violently, even after the 15th Amendment became law.

It took 95 years to add the Voting Rights Act of 1965 to America’s anti-discrimination voting laws. Now Texas Republicans want to end those rights.

Since taking control of Congress in 2010, the radical conservative message of Tea Party Republicans has emboldened more than 30 Republican governors to enact or attempt to enact voter ID laws that are intended to bring discrimination back to American voting booths.

The object is not just to stop blacks from voting, but other minority groups as well. The reason is to control the outcome of the 2012 elections in favor of Republican candidates, who would then use their power to further limit the voting rights of non-white, Democratic-leaning voters.

Texas’ attempt to manipulate elections through new Voter ID laws was blocked by the Department of Justice in March. The DOJ ruling came after claims of voter fraud were proven to be virtually non-existent, and the targets of the law were disproportionately minority groups. In short, the Texas voter ID law was determined to be illegal discrimination.

If the Voting Rights Act of 1965 is successfully repealed by Republicans, America will be taking a step back in history to a time in when white supremacy groups ruled and recently freed black slaves were denied the right to vote.

What these Republicans are trying to do to this country is more than troubling. It's outright terrifying.

Despite claims that they are supporters of the Constitution and Bill of Rights, Republicans are behaving as though they despise the founding document of the United States, as demonstrated by their efforts to destroy it piece by piece until there is nothing left.

If you like to write about U.S. politics and Campaign 2012, enter "The American Pundit" competition. Allvoices is awarding four $250 prizes each month between now and November. These monthly winners earn eligibility for the $5,000 grand prize, to be awarded after the November election.

Related:

U.S. Justice Department strikes down Texas voter ID law

ID law could impact 10 percent of Pennsylvania voters

What Republicans want and what they can get with Citizens United

1 of 1
Constitution of the United States of America
Texas Republicans want to repeal the Voting Rights Act of 1964  
itobin53 is based in Tampa, Florida, United States of America, and is an Anchor for Allvoices.
Report Credibility
 
  • Clear
  • Share:
  • Share
  • Clear
  • Clear
  • Clear
  • Clear
 
 
Advertisement
 
Posted By Deepizzaguy George Vieto | 11 months ago
The Texas Republicans are doing what they can to make sure they get elected.
Reply By Surly_Curmudgen Surly_Curmudgen | 11 months ago
The Texas Republicans are doing what they can to make sure Democrats can't cheat with voter fraud.
Posted By DavaCastillo Dava Castillo | 11 months ago
The famous Texas advocate Representative Barbara Jordon will be turning over in her grave. : (

She was the champion from Texas that battled for the renewal of the Voting Rights Act.

I wrote about this six months ago, and the Republicans are still at it.

http://www.allvoices.com/contributed-news/11219321-voting-is-your-right-dont-let-republicans-regulate-your-fundamental-right-to-vote
Reply By Surly_Curmudgen Surly_Curmudgen | 11 months ago
voting is your right don't let Democrats nullify your fundamental right to vote with fraudulent votes.
Posted By albertacowpoke Karl Gotthardt | 11 months ago
Under a provision of the Voting Rights Act, certain jurisdictions must obtain permission from the federal government — called “preclearance” — before they change their voting rules. The rule was put in place in jurisdictions with a history of voter disenfranchisement.

Some elected officials, including Texas Gov. Rick Perry, a Republican, have since argued that the rules put an unfair burden on certain places and not others. Texas is one of nine states that must obtain preclearance before changing its electoral guidelines.

The declaration by the state’s GOP comes as Texas continues protracted fights over voting rights on several legal fronts. U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder blocked the state’s recent voter I.D. law, citing discrimination against minority voters. And a federal judge earlier this month heard motions in a lawsuit filed by Project Vote, a voting rights group that tries to expand voting in low-income communities, that claimed the state’s laws made it illegally difficult to register new voters.

This has to do with voter ID and not voter suppression. You need an ID card to deal with a bank, get a driver's license etc.

While you demonize the GOP for making sure that those who vote are eligible to vote, you also want to enable Democrats to register non-eligible voters. It's not like this didn't happen with ACORN in 2008.
Reply By canucanoe2 canucanoe2 | 11 months ago
More right wing twisting of the facts. The people that got busted at Acorn for registering fake voters were defrauding Acorn. They got commissions for each voter registered so they faked a bunch to make more money. None of the fake voters ever voted, so where is the REAL fraud? Any evidence of real fraud is statistically insignificant, so why make it more difficult to vote? If one person loses their right to vote because of these ID laws, that's one too many.
"House Majority Leader Mike Turzai (R-Allegheny) suggested that the House’s end game in passing the Voter ID law was to benefit the GOP politically."
I suspect you have someone type your comments because it seem apparent that you have an inability to read facts.
Reply By firesisle Hardy Wright | 11 months ago
"If one person loses their right to vote because of these ID laws, that's one too many."

I'd say that if one person was allowed to vote who wasn't legally entitled, it's also one too many.
Posted By itobin53 itobin53 | 11 months ago
voter ID is a ruse - even the republicans admit it!

In PA where they are disenfranchising 8% of the population, there have only 13 cases of voter fraud in the past 10 years!

This is not the party of Regan anymore. This is the party of liars, cheats and racists. They are bought and owned by millionaires and CEO's. I don't know why - with all that has been exposed recently - that anyone would trust them with their vote.

Romney hides his money in Swiss bank accounts and the Cayman islands and 5 other countries so he can avoid paying taxes. He refuses to release more tax returns, refuses to disclose his bundlers. If he is hiding so much now, just think of what a tax evader would lie about as president.
Reply By firesisle Hardy Wright | 11 months ago
Sorry but where do the Republicans admit that Voter ID is a ruse? Got some sources?
Reply By canucanoe2 canucanoe2 | 11 months ago
House Majority Leader Mike Turzai (R-Allegheny)from PA admitted it. Google it.
Reply By firesisle Hardy Wright | 11 months ago
Dude... that's mere speculation. It wouldn't stand up in court, and probably not in the court of public opinion... really a reach, except for people with preconceived notions of a paranoid conspiracy... let's try again...

How about some real evidence...
Reply By Surly_Curmudgen Surly_Curmudgen | 11 months ago
The Liberal/progressive world is a world where to lie, cheat, steal even murder to advance their agenda, is laudable behavior.
Their favorite ploy is to blame their opponents of doing what they do, lie, cheat and steal.
Posted By itobin53 itobin53 | 11 months ago
they are uncovering NOTHING. There have been 22 cases of documented voter fraud documented in Ill.

In indiana there were 86 OUT OF 300 MILLION VOTES CAST

In PA there have only been 13 cases of voter fraud. THIRTEEN!!!!

These voter ID laws are not about fraud. Close to a million people in PA LEGALLY allowed to vote will be blocked because of these new laws. That's fair? That's American? really?

How does anyone justify stopping LEGAL voting by millions just to go after 13 people?

The votes of LEGAL voters that are blocked don't matter? How come the republicans don't care about that? Are they communists now?
Reply By firesisle Hardy Wright | 11 months ago
"they are uncovering NOTHING. There have been 22 cases of documented voter fraud documented in Ill."

Since when? The voter fraud of the previous Daley regime is well known and documented; Ever hear the phrase, "Vote early and often?"
Posted By Whitecat31 Whitecat31 | 11 months ago
I see a lot of name call demonizing the opponent to justify actions. This is called an Ad hominem attack. Ad Hominem attacks are the tools of the weak who are incapable of using real supporting evidence to back up their claims. If you find yourself calling people names to make your argument, chances are you are incapable of logically defending your point.
There is absolutely no evidence that since the Voting Rights Act in 1965 was put in place that any major election was swayed by any type of voter fraud that an ID requirement would negate. The requirements of ID's is used to suppress the minority voters, the poor voters, the elderly, and students who have moved away to college. Those ID requirements are an undue burden for many of these voters even though the time and effort to acquire may be minimal to us. To us a couple of hours and 30 dollars spent at the DMV and the 6-10 week waiting time to get an ID means little. To others it is too costly, or you don't even know where you will be living in 2 and a half months.
Posted By firesisle Hardy Wright | 11 months ago
"Those ID requirements are an undue burden for many of these voters even though the time and effort to acquire may be minimal to us."

Why? Getting an ID is a no-brainer. If it's not worth the effort, then they shouldn't be allowed to vote.
Posted By Whitecat31 Whitecat31 | 11 months ago
@Hardy Wright. So you are basically saying it is ok to charge people for the right to vote every time they move? What if the cost of these ID's was 1000 dollars, to make 100% sure they cant be counterfeited? Or perhaps DNA testing was required at the voters cost? At what point and whose perspective to do we determine who has the right to vote and who does not?
It used to be, that only male land owners were allowed to vote. Would that work for you?

Would you settle for a compromise? We raise taxes on the municipalities to pay for the shuttle rides, the time spent, and the cost of the ID's. Not to mention the lunches for these people, and of course the overtime pay for DMV workers to deal with the load. Everything has a cost. Even voter equality without the irrational fear of non-existent election changing voter fraud.. Would you be willing to pay for it out of your tax dollars for everybody who registers to vote?
Reply By firesisle Hardy Wright | 11 months ago
"@Hardy Wright. So you are basically saying it is ok to charge people for the right to vote every time they move?"

I'm basically saying exactly what I said. If getting an ID is too much trouble, don't vote.

"What if the cost of these ID's was 1000 dollars, to make 100% sure they cant be counterfeited?"

What if my ass turned blue and sprouted a pony tail?

"Or perhaps DNA testing was required at the voters cost? At what point and whose perspective to do we determine who has the right to vote and who does not?"

The Constitution has determined who may and who may not vote. If nobody wanted to have it vetted, it would have been a pretty big waste of time to even mention it, no?

"It used to be, that only male land owners were allowed to vote. Would that work for you?"

What would work for me, is simply showing a state ID, military ID, or other acceptable form of identification... like when you cash a Social Security check, or withdraw money from a bank account, etc.

"Would you settle for a compromise? We raise taxes on the municipalities to pay for the shuttle rides, the time spent, and the cost of the ID's. Not to mention the lunches for these people, and of course the overtime pay for DMV workers to deal with the load."

Sorry... that's just stupid... LOL. Which planet are you from again?

"Everything has a cost. Even voter equality without the irrational fear of non-existent election changing voter fraud.. Would you be willing to pay for it out of your tax dollars for everybody who registers to vote?"

Dude... I already pay for it... it's a legal requirement. I already pay for Welfare, Medicare, Medicaid, food stamps, Section 8 housing, public education, etc... just put it on my freakin' bill.

Of course it will also have to pay for all my ID renewals as well since we are all equal under the law.
Posted By NTosches NTosches | 11 months ago
Isn't it a little ironic how this party claims they want to prevent "voter fraud" and yet the Super-PACs basically enabled a very small percentage of the population to purchase a presidency? I'm sure it will only be coincidence that the majority of people affected by this repeal(should it be passed,) will be disproportionally-non whites who have the misfortune of living in a state that still seems to be heavily influenced by Jim Crow.
Reply By firesisle Hardy Wright | 11 months ago
"Isn't it a little ironic how this party claims they want to prevent "voter fraud" and yet the Super-PACs basically enabled a very small percentage of the population to purchase a presidency?"

Blame the Supreme Court; it's a ruling I still don't agree with regardless of what it buys.

"I'm sure it will only be coincidence that the majority of people affected by this repeal(should it be passed,) will be disproportionally-non whites who have the misfortune of living in a state that still seems to be heavily influenced by Jim Crow."

Actually, the repeal will affect every single middle class individual, because they'll be spared the single biggest tax hike in history.
Advertisement
 

News Stories

 

Blogs

 >
  • Texas Republican Party Platform Calls For … | Should Texas ...

    shouldtexassecede.com
    The Texas Republican Party has released its official platform for 2012, and the repeal of the landmark Voting Rights Act of 1965 is one of its central. ... U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder blocked the state's recent voter I.D. law, citing
  • Texas GOP: Repeal The Voting Rights Act - Africanglobe ...

    www.africanglobe.net
    The declaration by the state's GOP comes as Texas continues protracted fights over voting rights on several legal fronts. U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder blocked the state's recent voter I.D. law, citing discrimination against minority
  • Mess In Texas « CBS Connecticut

    connecticut.cbslocal.com
    Texas Republicans are calling for the repeal of the Voting Rights Act. ... To address these issues, there is federal oversight of elections administration in states and jurisdictions with a history of discriminatory voting practices. ... state's
  • Texas Republican Party Platform: Voter Rights Act of 1965

    lawtonftsillprogressives.blogspot.com
    The Voting Rights Act of 1965 (42 U.S.C. §§ 1973–1973aa-6) is a landmark piece of national legislation in the United States that outlawed discriminatory voting practices that had been responsible for the widespread disenfranchisement of ... of Texas
  • SMITH: DOJ'S DATA FIRM POSES CONFLICT IN TEXAS ...

    freedomismist.blogspot.com
    DOJ: Texas Delay Jeopardizes Voter Law Implementation Democratic Senators Urge Holder to Probe Voter-ID Laws Department to Halt New South Carolina Voter Law Conyers Calls for Hearing to Evaluate Florida's Voter Purge Justices Hear Texas
  • AG Holder could block NH Voter ID

    newhampshire.watchdog.org
    In March, Justice determined that Texas lawmakers failed to prove their state's new Voter ID law did not have a “discriminatory purpose or effect.” The Attorney General is at the center of showdown with the U.S. House of Representatives, ...

Images

 >
 

More From Allvoices

Report Your News Got a similar story?
Add it to the network!

Or add related content to this report

 
Tap_logo_330_110_event
 


Use of this site is governed by our Terms of Use Agreement and Privacy Policy.

© Allvoices, Inc 2008-2013. All rights reserved.