Amid the wave of new voter ID laws that have swept red states over the past two years, some Republicans want to take things a step further. In Texas, they want to repeal the Voting Rights Act of 1965.
As part of the 2012 Texas Republican Party platform, the Voting Rights Act of 1965 has been targeted for repeal.
The 22-page Texas Republican document states, "We urge that the Voter Rights Act of 1965 codified and updated in 1973 be repealed and not reauthorized," according to MSNBC.
In order to understand the gravity, and perhaps motivation of this GOP effort, a look at the reason the law was enacted in the first place can shed some light on the issue.
“Congress determined that the existing federal anti-discrimination laws were not sufficient to overcome the resistance by state officials to enforcement of the 15th Amendment. The legislative hearings showed that the Department of Justice's efforts to eliminate discriminatory election practices by litigation on a case-by-case basis had been unsuccessful in opening up the registration process; as soon as one discriminatory practice or procedure was proven to be unconstitutional and enjoined, a new one would be substituted in its place and litigation would have to commence anew,” according to the Department of Justice.
The 15th Amendment was ratified in 1870 because there was an abundance of state laws that discriminated against "black voting" by recently freed slaves. The former Confederate states had up to a million black voters who, although they now had the right to vote, still faced discriminatory voting practices, including poll taxes and literacy tests.
White supremacy groups, like the Ku Klux Klan and the Knights of the White Camellia, continued their efforts to stop freed slaves from voting through intimidation, sometimes violently, even after the 15th Amendment became law.
It took 95 years to add the Voting Rights Act of 1965 to America’s anti-discrimination voting laws. Now Texas Republicans want to end those rights.
Since taking control of Congress in 2010, the radical conservative message of Tea Party Republicans has emboldened more than 30 Republican governors to enact or attempt to enact voter ID laws that are intended to bring discrimination back to American voting booths.
The object is not just to stop blacks from voting, but other minority groups as well. The reason is to control the outcome of the 2012 elections in favor of Republican candidates, who would then use their power to further limit the voting rights of non-white, Democratic-leaning voters.
Texas’ attempt to manipulate elections through new Voter ID laws was blocked by the Department of Justice in March. The DOJ ruling came after claims of voter fraud were proven to be virtually non-existent, and the targets of the law were disproportionately minority groups. In short, the Texas voter ID law was determined to be illegal discrimination.
If the Voting Rights Act of 1965 is successfully repealed by Republicans, America will be taking a step back in history to a time in when white supremacy groups ruled and recently freed black slaves were denied the right to vote.
What these Republicans are trying to do to this country is more than troubling. It's outright terrifying.
Despite claims that they are supporters of the Constitution and Bill of Rights, Republicans are behaving as though they despise the founding document of the United States, as demonstrated by their efforts to destroy it piece by piece until there is nothing left.
If you like to write about U.S. politics and Campaign 2012, enter "The American Pundit" competition. Allvoices is awarding four $250 prizes each month between now and November. These monthly winners earn eligibility for the $5,000 grand prize, to be awarded after the November election.
Related:
U.S. Justice Department strikes down Texas voter ID law
ID law could impact 10 percent of Pennsylvania voters
What Republicans want and what they can get with Citizens United
Or add related content to this report
News Stories | Blogs | Images | Videos | Comments
She was the champion from Texas that battled for the renewal of the Voting Rights Act.
I wrote about this six months ago, and the Republicans are still at it.
http://www.allvoices.com/contributed-news/11219321-voting-is-your-right-dont-let-republicans-regulate-your-fundamental-right-to-vote
Some elected officials, including Texas Gov. Rick Perry, a Republican, have since argued that the rules put an unfair burden on certain places and not others. Texas is one of nine states that must obtain preclearance before changing its electoral guidelines.
The declaration by the state’s GOP comes as Texas continues protracted fights over voting rights on several legal fronts. U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder blocked the state’s recent voter I.D. law, citing discrimination against minority voters. And a federal judge earlier this month heard motions in a lawsuit filed by Project Vote, a voting rights group that tries to expand voting in low-income communities, that claimed the state’s laws made it illegally difficult to register new voters.
This has to do with voter ID and not voter suppression. You need an ID card to deal with a bank, get a driver's license etc.
While you demonize the GOP for making sure that those who vote are eligible to vote, you also want to enable Democrats to register non-eligible voters. It's not like this didn't happen with ACORN in 2008.
"House Majority Leader Mike Turzai (R-Allegheny) suggested that the House’s end game in passing the Voter ID law was to benefit the GOP politically."
I suspect you have someone type your comments because it seem apparent that you have an inability to read facts.
I'd say that if one person was allowed to vote who wasn't legally entitled, it's also one too many.
In PA where they are disenfranchising 8% of the population, there have only 13 cases of voter fraud in the past 10 years!
This is not the party of Regan anymore. This is the party of liars, cheats and racists. They are bought and owned by millionaires and CEO's. I don't know why - with all that has been exposed recently - that anyone would trust them with their vote.
Romney hides his money in Swiss bank accounts and the Cayman islands and 5 other countries so he can avoid paying taxes. He refuses to release more tax returns, refuses to disclose his bundlers. If he is hiding so much now, just think of what a tax evader would lie about as president.
How about some real evidence...
Their favorite ploy is to blame their opponents of doing what they do, lie, cheat and steal.
In indiana there were 86 OUT OF 300 MILLION VOTES CAST
In PA there have only been 13 cases of voter fraud. THIRTEEN!!!!
These voter ID laws are not about fraud. Close to a million people in PA LEGALLY allowed to vote will be blocked because of these new laws. That's fair? That's American? really?
How does anyone justify stopping LEGAL voting by millions just to go after 13 people?
The votes of LEGAL voters that are blocked don't matter? How come the republicans don't care about that? Are they communists now?
Since when? The voter fraud of the previous Daley regime is well known and documented; Ever hear the phrase, "Vote early and often?"
There is absolutely no evidence that since the Voting Rights Act in 1965 was put in place that any major election was swayed by any type of voter fraud that an ID requirement would negate. The requirements of ID's is used to suppress the minority voters, the poor voters, the elderly, and students who have moved away to college. Those ID requirements are an undue burden for many of these voters even though the time and effort to acquire may be minimal to us. To us a couple of hours and 30 dollars spent at the DMV and the 6-10 week waiting time to get an ID means little. To others it is too costly, or you don't even know where you will be living in 2 and a half months.
Why? Getting an ID is a no-brainer. If it's not worth the effort, then they shouldn't be allowed to vote.
It used to be, that only male land owners were allowed to vote. Would that work for you?
Would you settle for a compromise? We raise taxes on the municipalities to pay for the shuttle rides, the time spent, and the cost of the ID's. Not to mention the lunches for these people, and of course the overtime pay for DMV workers to deal with the load. Everything has a cost. Even voter equality without the irrational fear of non-existent election changing voter fraud.. Would you be willing to pay for it out of your tax dollars for everybody who registers to vote?
I'm basically saying exactly what I said. If getting an ID is too much trouble, don't vote.
"What if the cost of these ID's was 1000 dollars, to make 100% sure they cant be counterfeited?"
What if my ass turned blue and sprouted a pony tail?
"Or perhaps DNA testing was required at the voters cost? At what point and whose perspective to do we determine who has the right to vote and who does not?"
The Constitution has determined who may and who may not vote. If nobody wanted to have it vetted, it would have been a pretty big waste of time to even mention it, no?
"It used to be, that only male land owners were allowed to vote. Would that work for you?"
What would work for me, is simply showing a state ID, military ID, or other acceptable form of identification... like when you cash a Social Security check, or withdraw money from a bank account, etc.
"Would you settle for a compromise? We raise taxes on the municipalities to pay for the shuttle rides, the time spent, and the cost of the ID's. Not to mention the lunches for these people, and of course the overtime pay for DMV workers to deal with the load."
Sorry... that's just stupid... LOL. Which planet are you from again?
"Everything has a cost. Even voter equality without the irrational fear of non-existent election changing voter fraud.. Would you be willing to pay for it out of your tax dollars for everybody who registers to vote?"
Dude... I already pay for it... it's a legal requirement. I already pay for Welfare, Medicare, Medicaid, food stamps, Section 8 housing, public education, etc... just put it on my freakin' bill.
Of course it will also have to pay for all my ID renewals as well since we are all equal under the law.
Blame the Supreme Court; it's a ruling I still don't agree with regardless of what it buys.
"I'm sure it will only be coincidence that the majority of people affected by this repeal(should it be passed,) will be disproportionally-non whites who have the misfortune of living in a state that still seems to be heavily influenced by Jim Crow."
Actually, the repeal will affect every single middle class individual, because they'll be spared the single biggest tax hike in history.