-
The Hindu
| 11 months ago
Supreme Court on Thursday upheld the individual insurance requirement at the heart of President Barack Obama's healthcare overhaul...Supreme Court on Thursday may have virtually handed President Barack Obama a second term in the White House after it...
-
DiabetesMine.com
| 11 months ago
Supreme Court, which just ruled today on the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act . Everyone's talking about this, and it's apparently the most widely anticipated Court decision in memory, according to those in the know. This is about insurance...
-
Guardian Unlimited
| 11 months ago
Christy Bowe/Corbis After two years of political warfare, three days of intense arguments and weeks of speculation from pundits, the US supreme court still managed to deliver a ruling on healthcare which almost nobody had predicted. A little after...
-
Boston Globe
| 11 months ago
We need to use this moment to reflect on the importance of the Supreme Court and who sits on the Supreme Court, Warren told liberal talk show host Rachel Maddow. Noting the justices ruled earlier this week to uphold their 2010 Citizens United...
-
USA Today
| 11 months ago
The Supreme Court on Thursday rejected a 2005 federal law that punishes people who lie about medals and military service, concluding it had a sweeping and chilling effect on free speech...Alvarez involves the case of a California water board member,...
-
The New Zealand Herald
| 11 months ago
Supreme Court upheld the heart of President Barack Obama's health care overhaul, handing him a huge election-year political victory and keeping in force the legislative centrepiece of his term, a law aimed at covering more than 30 million uninsured...
-
Epoch Times
| 11 months ago
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) on Thursday. The entire ACA is now constitutional, including the controversial individual mandate, which requires every adult, with a few exceptions, to purchase health insurance or pay a tax...It's a...
-
United Press International
| 11 months ago
Supreme Court, by a vote of 6-3 Thursday, struck down a law that made it a crime to falsely claim to have won medals for military service. "Lying was his habit," Justice Anthony Kennedy said in his majority opinion. "Xavier Alvarez ... lied when he...
-
International Business Times
| 11 months ago
Supreme Court sided with the Obama administration and upheld the individual mandate provision of the 2010 Affordable Care Act. The decision's impact will be felt across the country, from small business owners to those without health insurance. It...
-
CNSNews.com
| 11 months ago
Supreme Court Associate Justice Anthony Kennedy, in commenting on the dissent in the Obamacare case said, In our view, the entire Act before us is invalid in its entirety. He made his remark inside the Court on Thursday. In the written dissent, it...
-
The Dish Rag
| 11 months ago
The crux of the issue was the mandate that all people must have health care and the court rejected the federal government's argument that it was constitutional under the commerce clause, but they accepted the argument that the manda t e, which if you...
-
Seattle Times
| 11 months ago
AP reports that the Supreme Court has upheld the individual mandate part of the Affordable Care Act in a 5-4 ruling...Here is an interactive map and timeline from the AP on health care reform. And we've posted a Discuss blog post where you can share...
-
Daily Southtown
| 11 months ago
Supreme Court upheld the essential elements of President Barack Obama's health care law on Thursday, with Chief Justice John Roberts providing the critical swing vote in a 5-4 ruling. The decision means the most controversial part of the law the...
-
KTUV
| 11 months ago
Thursday, June 28, 2012 Seth Wenig Brianny Abreu, 6, has her vitals checked at the William F. Ryan Community Health Center in New York, Wednesday, June 27, 2012. The Supreme Court on Thursday upheld the individual insurance requirement at the heart...
-
United Press International
| 11 months ago
Police may not arrest people they suspect of a deportable offense without a warrant, the Supreme Court said in a split decision about Arizona's immigration law. "As a general rule, it is not a crime for a removable alien to remain in the United...
-
Las Vegas Review-Journal / Sun
| 11 months ago
The Supreme Court struck down much of Arizona's first-of-its-kind crackdown on illegal immigrants, ruling that states must defer to the federal government on immigration policy in an election-year victory for President Barack Obama. The justices,...
-
Sacramento Bee
| 11 months ago
The 5-to-3 decision upholding the so-called "show me your papers" provision came with a warning that the courts would be watching its implementation. Arizona's Republican Gov. Jan Brewer declared victory and said police could enforce the law without...
-
Chandler Republic
| 11 months ago
Supreme Court considered four sections of Arizona's 14-part Senate Bill 1070...Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan recused herself because she was U.S. solicitor general when the federal government sued Arizona. The other eight justices issued a 5-3...
-
Denver Post
| 11 months ago
The Supreme Court on Monday delivered a split decision on Arizona's tough 2010 immigration law, upholding its most hotly debated provision but blocking others on the grounds that they interfered with the federal government's role in setting...
-
Aim Jefferson
| 11 months ago
The government of the United States has broad, undoubted power over the subject of immigration and the status of aliens."...Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy in writing the court's majority opinion on Monday, striking down three of the four...
-
SF Gate
| 11 months ago
The Supreme Court handed the Obama administration a partial victory Monday in a fiercely contested battle over immigration, finding that three of four provisions of a controversial Arizona law improperly usurp the federal government's broad authority...
-
Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
| 11 months ago
The federal government, not states, holds responsibility for enforcing immigration laws, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled Monday, striking down three key parts of Arizona's crackdown on illegal immigrants and jeopardizing similar laws in five other...
-
National Public Radio
| 11 months ago
Supreme Court has struck down key provisions of Arizona's strict immigration law but kept in place its most controversial part, the so-called "show-meyour-papers" provision. The 5-3 decision warned, however, that the court could ultimately strike...
-
USA Today
| 11 months ago
The political heat will only increase on Thursday when the justices are expected to issue another highly anticipated ruling on the president's health care law. The Arizona ruling follows Obama's decision this month to halt the deportation of young...
-
San Jose Mercury News
| 11 months ago
A divided Supreme Court threw out major parts of Arizona's tough crackdown on illegal immigrants Monday in a ruling sure to reverberate through the November elections. However, the justices unanimously approved the law's most-discussed provision:...
-
San Jose Mercury News
| 11 months ago
Font Resize In a 5-3 ruling, the Supreme Court on Monday struck down parts of Arizona's tough immigration law, SB 1070, but upheld a key provision allowing police to question and detain people if officers have stopped them and have "reasonable"...
-
Community News
| 11 months ago
Anthony Kennedy's opinion for the Supreme Court embraced most of the Obama administration's view that Arizona's aggressive immigration laws are pre-empted by the federal government's power to determine who is or is not allowed in the country. For...
-
Baltimore Sun
| 11 months ago
But in a split verdict, the justices also ruled that the three other provisions of the Western state's 2010 law that were challenged in court by the Obama administration went too far. The votes on those provisions were either 5-3 or 6-2, with the...
-
Mother Jones
| 11 months ago
The court resoundingly rejected the argument that Arizona had the right to impose its own criminal penalties for being undocumented in [Arizona] or trying to seek work in the state," says Elizabeth Wydra, chief counsel at the liberal Constitution...
-
Boston Globe
| 11 months ago
The Supreme Court on Monday struck down significant portions of the controversial Arizona immigration law, but allowed to stand a hot-button provision that requires police officers to review the immigration status of all those they detain. The high...
-
AP Online
| 11 months ago
The Supreme Court ruled Monday that it is unconstitutional for state laws to require juveniles convicted of murder to be sentenced to life in prison without possibility of parole.
The 5-4 decision is in line with others the court has...
-
The Hill
| 11 months ago
Supreme Court on Monday tossed out most of Arizona's controversial immigration law. The court upheld the most controversial part of the law, which allows law enforcement officials to verify a person's legal status when they're stopped on suspicion of...
-
The Washington Times
| 11 months ago
The Supreme Court on Monday struck down most of Arizona's tough immigration law as an unlawful infringement on federal power, but it upheld the most important plank, which allows police to stop and question the immigration status of those they...
-
CNSNews.com
| 11 months ago
An artist rendering shows Solicitor General Donald Verrilli speaking before the Supreme Court in Washington on Wednesday during a hearing on Arizona's immigration law. The Supreme Court has struck down key provisions of SB 1070, Arizona's crackdown...
-
SF Gate
| 11 months ago
The Supreme Court threw out key provisions of Arizona's crackdown on illegal immigrants Monday but said a much-debated portion could go forward on checking the status of suspects who might appear to be in the U.S...The court upheld the "show me your...
-
San Jose Mercury News
| 11 months ago
Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas would have allowed all the challenged provisions to take effect. Justice Samuel Alito would have allowed police to arrest undocumented immigrants who seek work, and also make arrests without warrants.
-
CNN
| 11 months ago
Supreme Court ruled largely in favor of the federal government Monday in a case involving Arizona's immigration law, but it upheld the most controversial provision involving police checks on people's immigration status while enforcing other laws. In...
-
The Globe & Mail
| 11 months ago
Story The top court's ruling comes at the outset of a presidential election campaign in which the immigration issue is set to figure more prominently than expected. It also comes on the heels of President Barack Obama's recent move to halt the...
-
KSBY
| 11 months ago
But the court said Monday that one part of the law requiring police to check the status of someone they suspect is not in the United States legally could go forward. Even there, though, the justices said the provision could be subject to additional...
-
CNN
| 11 months ago
Supreme Court ruled largely in favor of the federal government Monday in a case involving Arizona's immigration law, but it upheld the most controversial provision involving police checks on people's immigration status while enforcing other laws. In...
-
Houston Chronicle
| 11 months ago
Volunteer Marissa Galindo of Phoenix joins a dozen others as they field calls about immigration from concerned Hispanics from around Arizona as 23 radio and television stations statewide Hoy Somos Arizona...Franklin / AP The Supreme Court's...
-
Minneapolis Star Tribune
| 11 months ago
The Supreme Court struck down key provisions of Arizona's crackdown on immigrants Monday but said a much-debated portion on checking suspects' status could go forward. The court did not throw out the state provision requiring police to check the...
-
NY Daily News
| 11 months ago
Supreme Court upholds key part of Arizona'scontroversial anti-illegal immigration law The Supreme Court said that one part of the law requiring police to check the status of someone they suspect is not in the United States legally could go forward.
-
International Business Times
| 11 months ago
Supreme Court ruled that federal law invalidates several portions of Arizona 's tough immigration law but kept in place a controversial provision requiring police officers to check the status of immigrants they believe to be in the country illegally.
-
USA Today
| 11 months ago
Supreme Court strikes down most of Arizona immigration law Updated The Supreme Court today struck down as unconstitutional most of Arizona's controversial law aimed at cracking down on illegal immigrants. The Supreme Court will issue its last...
-
USA Today
| 11 months ago
Justices strike down much of Arizona immigration law Updated The Supreme Court injected itself into the election year immigration debate today, striking down most of a controversial Arizona law...The justices did uphold an Arizona provision that said...
-
BBC
| 11 months ago
US Supreme Court upholds key Arizona immigration clause The US Supreme Court has upheld a key part of a tough Arizona immigration law that would give new powers to police to check the immigration status of people stopped and arrested. However, three...
-
AP Online
| 11 months ago
The Supreme Court has struck down key provisions of Arizona's crackdown on immigrants.
But the court said Monday that one much-debated part of the law could go forward — the portion requiring police to check the status of someone they...
-
Fox News
| 11 months ago
FoxNews.com The Supreme Court has struck down most of the controversial Arizona immigration law, but upheld a key provision. The provision that was upheld requires state and local police officers, during routine stops, to check the immigration...
-
Los Angeles Times
| 11 months ago
The Supreme Court is set this week to decide the politically charged constitutional clashes between President Obama and Republicans over his healthcare reform law and his immigration enforcement policy...But the justices could rule in unexpected ways...
