Obama takes big lead in polls: Romney money can’t buy him love
Linkedin

Obama takes big lead in polls: Romney money can’t buy him love

Washington : DC : USA | Jun 20, 2012 at 7:24 AM PDT
XX XX
Views: Pending
 
President Obama Sings

Mitt Romney’s 2012 election problem appears to be that money can’t buy him love.

Despite record campaign contributions from right-wing funded Super PACs, a new Bloomberg National poll shows Mitt Romney now trailing President Obama by a whopping 13 points. Obama leads with 53%, over Romney’s 40%.

While there were some numbers that favored Romney, the overall results pointed to a single factor: People just don’t like or trust Mitt Romney.

Romney’s big trouble seems to stem, in part, from a lack of support from his own Republican Party. Among the likely registered voters polled, 33% said they were Republicans, 38%, Democrats.

Romney’s lackluster support from the electorate has a common thread among independents and Democrats, as well as Republicans. The majority said they simply didn’t like Romney, calling him out of touch, by a 55% to 36% margin. Fewer than one-third said they wanted to sit next to Romney on an airplane, and nearly two-thirds don’t want to look at him on television for the next four years.

One respondent told the San Francisco Chronicle that while Obama, “hasn't fulfilled a lot of his campaign promises,” he would vote for him anyway because “Romney would be extremely destructive for this country."

Business Week reports: “The poll also undercuts Romney’s central argument for his candidacy, suggesting that his background as a private-equity executive isn’t seen by voters as his greatest strength.”

President Obama’s advertising on Romney’s time at Bain Capital LLC has apparently hit a chord with voters who lack confidence in Romney’s ability to be a job creator.

A Colorado small businessman said, Romney has “too much money to understand what a guy like me deals with,” the Business Week report added.

Education and immigration have been hot-button issues for Romney in recent weeks that could haunt him right up to Election Day in November. Romney said he would eliminate the Department of Education during the primaries, and just last week, reiterated his anti-Dream Act policy, saying that he would veto the bill if he were president.

The combination of education cuts and his immigration policy make it harder to sell a Romney presidency to an electorate whose top priority is job creation.

“Immigrants from Asia who come with a high level of education and highly marketable skills now outnumber Hispanic immigrants. Unlike the Mexicans who were taking jobs that Americans did not want to do, the new Asian immigrants are snapping up high paying positions for which too many American kids lack training,” according to the Los Angeles Times.

Young people in America are already having a hard time getting the education skills they need to compete in a high-tech world. More budget cuts to education gives foreigners an edge in the job market.

These latest numbers should give the GOP pause when it comes to negative campaign advertising against President Obama. The poll also showed that voters don’t really know who Romney really is, what he stands for, or what he would do as president. Therefore, it is not likely Romney can win with Obama-bashing alone.

The polls can change between now and November and likely will. Whether they show more Obama strength or shift in Romney’s favor is a wild card right now. The only thing that seems certain is that the outcome of 2012 presidential race will be a game-changer for the direction of the U.S. no matter who inevitably wins.

This poll was conducted, June 15 -18, 2012.

If you like writing about U.S. politics and the 2012 campaign, enter "The American Pundit" competition. Allvoices is awarding four $250 prizes each month between now and November. These monthly winners earn eligibility for the $5,000 grand prize, to be awarded after the November election.

Related:

Mitt Romney economic plan spells disaster to US economy

How does smaller government create jobs?

Back
1 of 36
Next
Obama polls ahead of Romney
itobin53 is based in Tampa, Florida, United States of America, and is an Anchor for Allvoices.
Report Credibility
 
  • Clear
  • Share:
  • Share
  • Clear
  • Clear
  • Clear
  • Clear
 
 
Advertisement
 
Posted By Punditty Punditty | 11 months ago
When people see Romney and Obama side by side, I think Obama will get a boost. As bad as Obama has been, Romney would be worse. However, if the mainstream media would do its job and start covering Gary Johnson, I think the former New Mexico governor would pull ahead of both of them.
Reply By gorilla1964 gorilla1964 | 11 months ago
I don't know where you get your information from, every poll that I have seen has Romney ahead by 3 to 7 points. There is no way this country can be dumb enough to vote for Obama again. he has been the worst president in the history of our country. He is taking away are freedoms and we cannot let that happen.
Reply By Keevin Keevin | 11 months ago
Why? They were even dumber to vote for w and cheney the second time.
Reply By firesisle Hardy Wright | 11 months ago
Not when faced with the morons the Democrats put up against them...
Reply By northsunm32 northsunm32 | 11 months ago
A huge problem is that the whole discourse in U.S. politics is based upon the two main parties. Not only do presidential candidates outside the two main parties suffer from lack of funds, they suffer from lack of publicity. They usually have no public visibility.
Posted By VeronicaS VeronicaS | 11 months ago
Democrats still cannot get complacent and from my vantage point, it looks like they're low on energy already. Money can't buy love but like Denzel Washington once said, Its a hellava down-payment on everything else! It has certainly bought the whole lot of them in Washington!
Reply By Gigi72 Gigi72 | 11 months ago
You are correct. Democrats cannot get complacent, they can't afford to. Democrats' complacency already cost numerous Congressional seats (Federal and State), Governor's elections, and countless state and local elections.
Posted By agb100 agb100 | 11 months ago
Question is, why would a foreigner usurper want to admit other illegals into the United States unless he too, was an illegal? What do the terms ILLEGAL and UNDOCUMENTED have to do with racism? Why is ILLEGAL not OK for a Brit or a German but is is OK for a Mexican, Colombian and Costa Rican?

I remain curious...good thing the readers of these blogs are not...

http://alerts.worldnetdaily.com/HM?a=ENX7Cqk-fVg08SA9MKJXjKDnGHxKLoQDXPcStGb5lw8W0bBhOG5mpqVsje_Hhe-ud1Jd
Reply By Gigi72 Gigi72 | 11 months ago
Oh, please, stop deflecting.

That is a major problem with anti-immigration supporters and their rhetoric. The fact is, that there are also countless ILLEGAL immigrants from Europe and Asia in this country, however, all of the anti-immigrant rhetoric ONLY points the finger and Latinos/Mexicans/Brown people, while deliberately NOT saying ANYTHING (TRUTHFUL) about the countless OTHER illegal immigrants to this country.
Posted By agb100 agb100 | 11 months ago
OBAMA's mentor at Harvard says beware! The VIDEO that's going viral on the net:

http://www.allvoices.com/contributed-news/12423313-obamas-harvard-mentor-give-warning-to-voters?clear_cache=true
Posted By itobin53 itobin53 | 11 months ago
This order applies to CHILDREN.

What kind of person wants to punish children who were brought here through no fault of their own?
Reply By Gigi72 Gigi72 | 11 months ago
A psychopath that gets off on the misery of others.
Posted By firesisle Hardy Wright | 11 months ago
*ROFLMFAO*... .... ..... ...............
Posted By agb100 agb100 | 11 months ago
OBAMA TAKES A BIG LEAD OVER ROMNEY - APRIL 20,2012

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4fPHnJdiF4g

BARRET TAKES A BIG LEAD OVER WALKER - SCREAMED THE LIBERAL HEADLINES.

RIGHT.


AND SINCE THEN, ROMNEY TOOK A BIG LEAD OVER OBAMA AND WALKER RIGHTFULLY CRUSHED BARRETT TO A GRAIN OF SAND IN THE HOURGLASS OF HISTORY.

THESE ARE STATISTICAL VARIATION NORMS. A BIG LEAD IN A PRESIDENTIAL RACE I 1/2 OF 1%...AND THAT MAY BE WHAT IT'LL COME DOWN TO.

ROMNEY HOWEVER WILL WIN BECAUSE BY THE TIME OF THE ELECTIONS THE ECONOMY WILL NOT HAVE IMPROVED. IN FACT, IT'LL HAVE WORSENED.

IF I WERE A LIBERAL I'D DOUBLE UP ON MY SLEEPING PILLS.
Posted By airwlf405 R. Francis Rubio | 11 months ago
Some pundits claim the poll is an outlier, I tend to believe it is closer to the truth than they think.

Just saying...
Posted By airwlf405 R. Francis Rubio | 11 months ago
It may be just me, but I find it completely rude when someone promotes their own unrelated article on another writers comment feed.
Reply By Keevin Keevin | 11 months ago
Sorry, didn't mean to be rude, just don't read it.
Posted By Keevin Keevin | 11 months ago
The congress of the state and federal government are the most powerful unions in the world. They vote their own wages, they vote their own pensions, they vote their own benefits, and they vote their own health insurance, ALL are the best, all are the most expensive, all are public employees, and all are at the government and taxpayer expense. Reducing their perks would go a long way at reducing the deficit and balancing the budget.
Posted By winds7seas winds7seas | 11 months ago
Romney can't win because he's dragging too much baggage from his past. The real target for Republicans is the House and Senate. If they gain with these it'll be 4 more years of obstructionism.
Posted By ChrisHumphrey ChrisHumphrey | 11 months ago
I don't trust the poll. AP has Obama just a bit over Romney. Rasmussen Reports, which is most accurate for presidential elections, I believe, has Romney ahead. See http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/obama_administration/daily_presidential_tracking_poll
Reply By agb100 agb100 | 11 months ago
You are correct - Rasmussen has been the most accurate historically. The mainstream is in Obama's pockets, so their reliability is about the same as the reliability of their analysis. Put all their pundits together and you get the intellectual output of a remote village in Turkey. Put them all together and they cannot stand up to a quadraplegic Charles Krauthammer or a Victor Davis Hansen. Can they?

I suppose they can if you consider Michael Moore's and Rosie O'Donnell's rants worthy of consideration.
Posted By Keevin Keevin | 11 months ago
republino base about 30%, racists about 10%, independents about 10% so this means EVERY Democrat must both get out the vote and vote.
Reply By agb100 agb100 | 11 months ago
YOU'RE RIGHT. The Democrats need to get out the vote like they have in Wisconsin. DECLARE YOUR DEPENDENCE now! And remember, DON'T DISENFRANCHISE THE DEAD.

The dead have voting rights too!

the dead know what you don't. That you CAN, take it with you.

Which reminds me of something I may have posed earlier to this gaggle, er, I mean cackle of intellectuals and movers and shakers writing these blogs:

There is a widening wealth disparity between the rich and the poor.

There is a reason for this unfortunate turn of events. You see, just as throughout history...

The rich keep doing the things that make them richer; and the poor keep doing things that keep them poor.

In other words, the rich understand human nature and the porr don't even understand themselves.

Socrates' First Commandment: Know Thyself!

And if you haven't yet caught on, it's ALL BUSH'S FAULT!

Ever since Bush pushed a button to summon Hurricane Katrina to punish blacks for not voting for him:

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xrnn9w_new-orleans-renewal-levees-rebuilt_travel

Yes, that was not Obama money, but Bush ordered the appropriations in 2005.

Funny how history deconstructs and peels away the layers of myths and lies that make up the liberal narrative, isn't it?

Funny how there were no WMD in Iraq, isn't it? Funny how Bush Lied and Valerie Plame and Joe Wilson didn't....isn't it?

http://www.resourceinvestor.com/2008/07/06/cameco-scoops-550t-of-yellowcake-in-secret-deal


http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/07/07/iraq.uranium/index.html

http://www.truthorfiction.com/rumors/u/uraniumyellowcake.htm


Funny how the TEA PARTY are racists, right?

http://www.lloydmarcus.com/?p=1114


Well, the trouble with our liberal friends is not that they are ignorant, but that they know so much that isn’t so.

Ronald Reagan: A Time for Choosing, Address on behalf of Senator Barry Goldwater,
Rendezvous with Destiny, October 27, 1964




I’ve noticed that everybody that is for abortion has already been born.

RONALD REAGAN, New York Times, Sep. 22, 1980

When you see all that rhetorical smoke billowing up from the Democrats, well ladies and gentleman, I'd follow the example of their nominee; don't inhale.

RONALD REAGAN, speech, Aug. 17, 1992
Posted By Poolshark Poolshark | 11 months ago
Nothing will change much. They will quibble and squabble like they always do and little progress will be made on anything. Don't count on getting a refund! What ever money Romney takes away from ACORN if he wins, will be given to his rich buddies. If Obama wins, The money will simply disappear into thin air.
Posted By Proquci Proquci | 11 months ago
HuH???????? WOW AMERICA... Arrest this evident usurper already.. thus is past ridiculous now ???
Posted By atifji75 atifji75 | 11 months ago
Excellent Work And Nice presentation. Thanks For Sharing. Rated up.
See All Comments
Advertisement
 

News Stories

 
  • Poll: Obama holds lead, majority of voters say Romney ‘out of touch'

    The Hill
    The Bloomberg National Poll asked likely voters which candidate's argument has been more convincing, as each campaign works to paint its rival as unaware of the plight of the "average American" in an election year dominated by the struggling economy.
  • Romney closing the election gap with focus on the economy

    The Hill
    According to a Pew Research poll released Thursday, 50 percent of registered voters support or lean toward supporting Obama, while 46 percent support or lean toward Romney. That's a very narrow lead for Obama, with a margin of error is plus or minus...
  • Obama says he will fight for immigration reform

    The Tribune
    I'll tackle immigration in 'civil' manner Romney: I'll tackle immigration in 'civil' manner Backing off the harsh rhetoric of the Republican primaries, Mitt Romney pledged Thursday to address illegal immigration "in a civil but resolute manner."
  • Can Mitt Romney gain traction with Hispanic voters? (+video)

    Christian Science Monitor
    But he still won't say whether he would overturn President Obama's new policy to help young illegal immigrants. Washington After a primary season marked by hard-line rhetoric toward illegal immigrants, presumptive GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney...
  • Obama's immigration stance could help in swing states: poll

    NY Daily News
    President Obama basked in the warm embrace of a Latino leaders conference Friday as a new poll shows that his new immigration policy could pay off in key swing states. Obama announced last week that nearly 1 million upstanding young, illegal...
  • New RNC ad targeting Hispanics focuses on economic message

    The Hill
    The ad, which argues that Obama's economic policies have hit the minority group particularly hard, does not mention immigration, despite polls suggesting that Hispanic support for Obama may be bolstered by his more lenient deportation rules. The ad,...

Images

 >
 

More From Allvoices

Related People

Report Your News Got a similar story?
Add it to the network!

Or add related content to this report

 
Tap_logo_330_110_event
 


Use of this site is governed by our Terms of Use Agreement and Privacy Policy.

© Allvoices, Inc 2008-2013. All rights reserved.