U.S. federal government proposes ban on all cell phone use while driving
Linkedin

U.S. federal government proposes ban on all cell phone use while driving

Washington : DC : USA | Apr 27, 2012 at 8:29 AM PDT
XX XX
Views: Pending
 
On the Go with Ray LaHood: June 2011

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration says there were approximately 3,000 fatal traffic accidents last year because of a distracted driver. Using a cell phone while driving delays reaction time and is comparable to driving to having .08 blood alcohol level.

Ray LaHood, the U.S. Transportation Secretary, has proposed a federal law to ban talking on a cell phone or texting while driving any type of vehicle on any road in the nation.

Tough federal legislation is the only way to deal with what he called a "national epidemic," he said at a distracted-driving summit in San Antonio, Texas, that drew doctors, advocates and government officials, according to a Reuters report.

LaHood said it is important for the police to have "the opportunity to write tickets when people are foolishly thinking they can drive safely or use a cell phone and text and drive."

LaHood has previously criticized behind-the-wheel use of cell phones and other devices, but calling for a federal law prohibiting the practice takes his effort to a new level.

But Gary Biller, president of the National Motorists Association, said laws banning specific actions like talking on a phone or texting are not necessary because those actions are already covered by existing distracted-driving laws. It would be more productive, he said, to invest resources in campaigns that discourage inattentive driving in general.

"It shouldn't matter if the driver is distracted by a conversation with another vehicle passenger, tuning the radio, eating a snack, or talking on a cell phone," Biller said in a statement. "Existing laws cover all those distractions and more."

LaHood said, however, he was not as concerned about people who eat, apply makeup, or perform other distracting activities in cars because "not everyone does that."

"But everyone has a cell phone and too many of us think it is OK to talk on our phones while we are driving," he said at the summit, sponsored by insurance company USAA, the Texas Department of Transportation and Shriners Hospitals for Children.

In September 2010, the U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) released a report on distracted driving fatalities for 2009. The NHTSA considers distracted driving to include some of the following as distractions: other occupants in the car, eating, drinking, smoking, adjusting radio, adjusting environmental control, reaching for object in car, and cell phone use.

In 2009 in the U.S. there was a reported 5,474 people killed by distracted drivers. Of those 995 were considered to be killed by drivers distracted by cell phones.

"It used to be that if an officer pulled you over for drunk driving, he would pat you on the back, maybe call you a cab or take you home, but he wouldn't arrest you," LaHood said. "Now that has changed, and the same enforcement can work for people who talk on cell phones while driving."

Thirty-eight states currently have some kind of ban on cell phone use while driving as well as all U.S. Department of Defense Installations worldwide. Internationally 64 countries also have bans on cell phone use while driving.

In the United Kingdom drivers who are distracted by cell use are being prosecuted similarly to speeding. In Japan mobile phone use while driving is prohibited including use of hands-free devices. New Zealand has instituted similar laws.

LaHood said his department was researching the effect that hands-free devices and new systems like Ford Motor Company's Sync have on distracting drivers. He said he has called the CEOs of major car companies and encouraged them to "think twice" before placing too many Internet-features on cars.

Resources

Reuters

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mobile_phones_and_driving_safety

Back
1 of 15
Next
cell phone
U.S. federal government proposes law banning cell phone use while driving.  Thirty-eight states have laws now, as well as 64 foreign countries.
Dava Castillo is based in Clearlake, California, United States of America, and is an Anchor for Allvoices.
Report Credibility
 
  • Clear
  • Share:
  • Share
  • Clear
  • Clear
  • Clear
  • Clear
 
 
Advertisement
 
Posted By VoiceforHope Amee Ellsworth | about 1 year ago
Very important information. Thank you! Shared and rated up!
Posted By sspsllc sspsllc | about 1 year ago
Good! I have been in the taxi cab with at least two drivers who were talking on the phone this year and both were distracted and nearly swayed off the road with me in the car because they were on their cellphones.
Posted By Punditty Punditty | about 1 year ago
I think the "hands-free" law in California would be a better model for a federal law than simply banning all cell-phone talking while driving. When you have both hands free, it is no different that talking with a passenger while driving.
Posted By scotamerican scotamerican | about 1 year ago
Why doesn't the federal government tackle drunk driving?
Reply By Chirurgeon Chirurgeon | about 1 year ago
WELL SAID. I couldn't agree more.
Posted By DavaCastillo Dava Castillo | about 1 year ago
Thank you to all who commented.

Punditty,
"Hands free" is curious because I think talking whilst driving can be distracting--or trying to make the kids stop fighting in the back seat of the car! I cannot tell you how many times I had to pull the car over and stop to sort out children fighting in the car. *sigh*

Some states and foreign countries don't allow cell use of any kind, and I think they are addressing the "distraction" issue in all its various manifestations.
Reply By Chirurgeon Chirurgeon | about 1 year ago
Dava, I totally agree that a "distracted driving" law is as fundamentally important as a "drunk driving" law. I think you've hit the nail right on the head.

However I think the government should be extremely careful when creating laws that are too specific, and may serve to define what "distracted driving" is in their eyes, making other offenses that would be just as dangerous unenforceable without new legislation.

Laws need to be simple. They need to make sense. With integrated voice-activation technology including maps, driver assistance, personal assistants and cellular phone service already included in more than one million automobiles, I don't see any such law as capable of enforcement, unless the government intends to reimburse automakers and vehicle owners for their lost commerce and property.
Reply By scotamerican scotamerican | about 1 year ago
Truly, this needs to be a state-driven issue. Consider what the Feds deal with now on the nations roads. It's no different than one of use taking on more and more tasking. How effective would we be with our efforts divided multiply times?
Posted By NadeemIftekhar NadeemIftekhar | about 1 year ago
A much needed action that I should call 'the need of the day.' I wish the same taking place in my own country where each day; we have countless fatal accidents claiming several lives. Rated Up!
Posted By Chirurgeon Chirurgeon | about 1 year ago
Folks are forgetting something called the CB radio, which is an integral part of the history of Americana. There wouldn't have been "Smokey and the Bandit" without the CB. There wouldn't have been "Convoy."

I agree texting involves removing your hands and eyes from the road for far too long a period of time to ever be considered safe, but in the world of hands-free EVERYTHING, there is no excuse for a ban on cell phone use at all.

By all means if someone commits a traffic offense while on a phone, write an additional "distracted driving" ticket, and require that they get an appropriate phone with a hands-free option within 30 days of the citation. If they get nailed again, step it up to "reckless driving" and suspend their license. For most phones we're talking about a $5 part you can pick up at a gas station, and anyone too stupid to go buy one is too stupid to drive.

Now as far as a total ban, the first time I see a ban on HAM radio or CB, or watch an ambulance, fire engine or police car pull into a parking lot to call in a report, I'll consider this law enforceable. I'll also see it as a violation of the Freedom of Speech. I don't recognize a government's power to violate my rights, because of something I MIGHT do. In this country, it's innocent until proved guilty.
Reply By scotamerican scotamerican | about 1 year ago
Guy, I like the way you think!!
Advertisement
 

News Stories

 
  • U.S. ban sought on cell phone use while driving

    Reuters
    Secretary of Transportation Ray LaHood opens the first press preview day of the North American International Auto Show in Detroit, Michigan January 9, 2012...Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood called on Thursday for a federal law to ban talking on a...

Blogs

 >
  • Samsung Is Now the Largest Phone Vendor, Take That, Nokia ...

    siliconangle.com
    “[E]veryone has a cell phone and too many of us think it is OK to talk on our phones while we are driving,” said LaHood during the summit, sponsored by insurance company USAA, the Texas Department of Transportation and Shriners Hospitals for Children.
  • Save us Chuck Woolery | Obama Seeks National Ban on Cell Phone ...

    saveuschuckwoolery.com
    “It shouldn't matter if the driver is distracted by a conversation with another vehicle passenger, tuning the radio, eating a snack, or talking on a cell phone,” Biller said in a statement. “Existing laws cover all those distractions and more.”

Images

 >
 

More From Allvoices

Report Your News Got a similar story?
Add it to the network!

Or add related content to this report

 
Tap_logo_330_110_event
 


Use of this site is governed by our Terms of Use Agreement and Privacy Policy.

© Allvoices, Inc 2008-2013. All rights reserved.