
I never quite understood this “holiday,” so I began doing some research. What I found was that this is a way of commemorating the history of our nation. The Civil War was brutal on both sides. Many lives were lost. Many family members fought against each other. I have always felt it is important to remember where we came from so we don’t go there again.
I recently saw a post on Facebook. It was a Confederate Flag and it said, “I Support Confederate History Month.” I was curious, so I asked the poster why they supported it. Here is what she said following a comment I made saying, “I guess to me it is just a reminder... don't forget how far we have come. :)” Her response? “or how far we have not come....now it seems the "slaves" feel entitled.....while ...what their family members went thru could be horrifying by today’s standards.....it was what it was and we cannot rewrite it. AND....not one single person alive today deserves reparations for the actions leading up to....during and after the civil war.”
Confederate History Month should be an event on an annual basis to acknowledge the history of our nation. Not a time to fly Confederate flags and make racist statements. Hate goes deep and it causes so many problems. It creates problems in society at every level. Yet if you try to point it out, you are blatantly told you are the racist for “playing the race card.”
During this same discussion, one woman told me that she does celebrate it. She does so because she has gotten involved with Civil War Re-enactment. She said, “Confederates are almost solely remembered as slave owners, but that is not all the Civil War was about, and frankly the North had just as many 'slaves' as the South...they were not from Africa like the southern slaves, they were from Ireland...the Civil War was about tariffs, States’ rights, a unionized country, unified currency, state laws v. federal laws, more...the slavery issue was not as big of issue then as it is made to be now. And the point of slavery, not just whites own slaves, Indians did as well as other black land owners had slaves as well.” I would have to imagine that being involved with the re-enactment would be very informative and educational.
It is the other attitude. The other attack made. It confuses me. Aren’t we about 200 years past all of that? For some it appears that we are not. I once read something talking about America as a woman and how sick she was. It was, of course, a political joke. But it got me to thinking…. She is sick. She is being eaten alive from the inside.
So the final piece of the puzzle? How do we fix her? Each and every one of us have to speak out when we see wrong. We have to call people out for being racist and angry. We each have an obligation to welcome the past, because it carries important lessons, but we must strive for a brighter future. We cannot simply sit by while we see this anger growing in the belly of our beloved nation.
Or add related content to this report
News Stories | Blogs | Images | Videos | Comments
If you had put a question mark at the end it would have looked a lot less like calling a group of people racist and more like investigative reporting.
Study real history opposed to the revisionist crap they feed you these days. Yes slavery was a major issue and part of the reason it was a major issue was states rights.
Do you see hiring quotas or minority only contracts as racist?
Do you see those who bring up slavery as an excuse why their people should be given the above racist?
Are you all for La Raza and the NAACP but hate the KKK?
Do you see that ALL the above groups are racist and contribute to the problem? Until people see and understand that then the problem will never be solved!
Not bad writing and something interesting to explore but a simple question mark placed at the end of your headline would make a huge difference in ether being a part of the problem or looking for answers to solve the problem.
Actually, commemoration of Confederate history could go either way. They could tell the truth about what the South stood for during those times, which basically was division of the country on a few levels.
Yes, it was political with the Federalists (in Washington City) and the Democratic-Republican Party (the South) formed by Jefferson and Madison in opposition to the Federalists. Their differences were ideological pitting the agrarian farmers against the city folk coupled with fears that Federalists were going set up a monarchy.
Regional differences persist in a country the size of the U.S., so I suppose the South believes this is their way of remembering "where they came from." If I were African American, I don't think I would want to celebrate my ancestors being slaves, but if the event honored slaves for their contribution and decried their treatment--then that is a different perspective.
This has been eye opening for sure! But with the conversation I had it really turned me against it. I doubt everyone feels like she did but it really made me angry.
The cotton exporting states had control of none of the branches of government in D.C. any longer. The states desiring to use tax policy to bar imports rather than pay government expenses had taken control. The South had a choice to either reorganize its economy or establish a new government. Since the Union was created to serve the states rather than the other way around, which option to choose was clear.
The North waged war on the South on the principle that it had a right to impose a rejected government upon Southerners and that resistance to it was treason and criminal.
Today, as before, those who worship the federal government flog the race issue, and slavery, because that is the only way they can justify the crime of coercing people back into the Union as moral. The rhetorical question that supposedly illustrates Southern hypocrisy is "How can the Union grant the South its freedom, when Southerners refuse to grant it to their slaves?" I ask, "If slaves deserve freedom, why don't Southerners?"
So, Confederate history needs to be taught to remind people that the promise of government by consent was broken in 1861 when Lincoln called for troops to shove a government they did not want down the throats of the people of the South with bayonets.
While I agree this is not the purest of reasons, I don't see it as promoting racism. I think your reaction is akin to saying you will not celebrate the Resurrection of Jesus on Easter because some people blame the Jews for His crucifixion and therefore promotes anti-Semitism. The redemption of mankind is the point of Easter. But, because some people get it wrong, nobody should be allowed their marshmallow chickies?
Confederate History month is about the idea that people have a right to pick and change their government and that force only settles questions of power, not of right.
I agree the truth should be taught, and agricultural success in the South was inextricably connected to slave labor, unlike other regions where slavery was a custom rather than a financial necessity.
The schism between the North and South was fueled also by the Treaty of Paris: 1) John Jay did not make good on compensation for slaves carried off to England at the end of the Revolution. Jay was an abolitionists, so right there he conflicted with the Southern states. 2) American sailors were kidnapped by the British in the West Indies, that was not addressed. But the worst of all was that Jay bargained away and gave British imports most-favored nation status, without reciprocity from England, which was a direct hit to cotton plantation owners in the South. (To name a few of the areas of contension.)
Overall there was lot to not like about the treaty for Democratic Republicans in the South, which caused the friction--once again--between the regionalists and federalists.
Lincoln's platform consisted of three issues: A central bank to allow the government to deficit spend; Internal improvement projects to build infrastructure which were political payoffs to Republican backers; and a protective tariff which meant the cotton exporters would pay for it all. There was nothing in this platform for the south except the tab. That is why the first seven states bolted. Without them to pay for the internal improvements, there would be no payoffs for Lincoln's backers. So Lincoln unconstitutionally called for troops to "preserve the Union." This action caused five more states to declare secession because participation in the Union was supposed to be voluntary, not coerced. Missouri and Kentucky declared secession after Federal troops invaded them.
Amee, You state that you don't think everyone feels this way yet at the same time also state you feel negative to the whole thing because of this one woman.
Do you think La Raza or the NAACP encourage racism?
How about the Black Panthers? How about Al Sharpton?
Do you think minority quotas for hiring,collage admission or government contracts encourage racism?
Do you suffer from white guilt?
Did you vote Obama? If so did his being black have anything to do with it? Is it racist for blacks or anybody else to vote for him due to the color of his skin?
Are you willing to give deep down thought to these questions and look deep inside yourself and give true answers?
You keep going on against racism yet I don't see you ever accuse anyone of it who isn't white. Maybe I missed it or maybe your a racist and don't even know it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2lbwTMHUMkU
Then we have a governor saying liberals primary goal is to murder unborn children
http://video.search.yahoo.com/search/video?p=youtube+governor+bryant+kill+children
Hate is running rampant and if we are not careful, our nation is going to continue backsliding!
Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY White country and ONLY White countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-Whites.
What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?
How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?
And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?
But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the White race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.
They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-White.
Anti-racist is a code word for anti-White.
I will have to check out the book you referenced.