Confederate History Month: Another excuse to tout racism
Linkedin

Confederate History Month: Another excuse to tout racism

Denver : CO : USA | Apr 26, 2012 at 9:38 AM PDT
XX XX
Views: Pending
 
Civil War Reenacting - Confederate

I never quite understood this “holiday,” so I began doing some research. What I found was that this is a way of commemorating the history of our nation. The Civil War was brutal on both sides. Many lives were lost. Many family members fought against each other. I have always felt it is important to remember where we came from so we don’t go there again.

I recently saw a post on Facebook. It was a Confederate Flag and it said, “I Support Confederate History Month.” I was curious, so I asked the poster why they supported it. Here is what she said following a comment I made saying, “I guess to me it is just a reminder... don't forget how far we have come. :)” Her response? “or how far we have not come....now it seems the "slaves" feel entitled.....while ...what their family members went thru could be horrifying by today’s standards.....it was what it was and we cannot rewrite it. AND....not one single person alive today deserves reparations for the actions leading up to....during and after the civil war.”

Confederate History Month should be an event on an annual basis to acknowledge the history of our nation. Not a time to fly Confederate flags and make racist statements. Hate goes deep and it causes so many problems. It creates problems in society at every level. Yet if you try to point it out, you are blatantly told you are the racist for “playing the race card.”

During this same discussion, one woman told me that she does celebrate it. She does so because she has gotten involved with Civil War Re-enactment. She said, “Confederates are almost solely remembered as slave owners, but that is not all the Civil War was about, and frankly the North had just as many 'slaves' as the South...they were not from Africa like the southern slaves, they were from Ireland...the Civil War was about tariffs, States’ rights, a unionized country, unified currency, state laws v. federal laws, more...the slavery issue was not as big of issue then as it is made to be now. And the point of slavery, not just whites own slaves, Indians did as well as other black land owners had slaves as well.” I would have to imagine that being involved with the re-enactment would be very informative and educational.

It is the other attitude. The other attack made. It confuses me. Aren’t we about 200 years past all of that? For some it appears that we are not. I once read something talking about America as a woman and how sick she was. It was, of course, a political joke. But it got me to thinking…. She is sick. She is being eaten alive from the inside.

So the final piece of the puzzle? How do we fix her? Each and every one of us have to speak out when we see wrong. We have to call people out for being racist and angry. We each have an obligation to welcome the past, because it carries important lessons, but we must strive for a brighter future. We cannot simply sit by while we see this anger growing in the belly of our beloved nation.

Back
1 of 3
Next
Confederate History Month
Confederate History Month- Another Excuse to Tout Racism
Amee Ellsworth is based in Bennett, Colorado, United States of America, and is an Anchor for Allvoices.
Report Credibility
 
  • Clear
  • Share:
  • Share
  • Clear
  • Clear
  • Clear
  • Clear
 
 
Advertisement
 
Posted By vinnyz vinnyz | about 1 year ago
First thing to do to "fix" the problem is to stop with he headlines that "tout" racism.
If you had put a question mark at the end it would have looked a lot less like calling a group of people racist and more like investigative reporting.
Study real history opposed to the revisionist crap they feed you these days. Yes slavery was a major issue and part of the reason it was a major issue was states rights.

Do you see hiring quotas or minority only contracts as racist?
Do you see those who bring up slavery as an excuse why their people should be given the above racist?

Are you all for La Raza and the NAACP but hate the KKK?
Do you see that ALL the above groups are racist and contribute to the problem? Until people see and understand that then the problem will never be solved!

Not bad writing and something interesting to explore but a simple question mark placed at the end of your headline would make a huge difference in ether being a part of the problem or looking for answers to solve the problem.
Posted By DavaCastillo Dava Castillo | about 1 year ago
Thanks for the report Amee.

Actually, commemoration of Confederate history could go either way. They could tell the truth about what the South stood for during those times, which basically was division of the country on a few levels.

Yes, it was political with the Federalists (in Washington City) and the Democratic-Republican Party (the South) formed by Jefferson and Madison in opposition to the Federalists. Their differences were ideological pitting the agrarian farmers against the city folk coupled with fears that Federalists were going set up a monarchy.

Regional differences persist in a country the size of the U.S., so I suppose the South believes this is their way of remembering "where they came from." If I were African American, I don't think I would want to celebrate my ancestors being slaves, but if the event honored slaves for their contribution and decried their treatment--then that is a different perspective.
Posted By VoiceforHope Amee Ellsworth | about 1 year ago
I never quite understood it, Dava. Well said, thank you.

This has been eye opening for sure! But with the conversation I had it really turned me against it. I doubt everyone feels like she did but it really made me angry.
Posted By PappyYokum PappyYokum | about 1 year ago
Confederate history needs to be taught. The U.S. was founded on the principle that government gets its just powers from the consent of the governed and when it no longer serves to purpose for which it was created, it is the right and duty of the people who created it to change or replace it. When the U.S. government went irretrievably into the hands of one section of the Union at the expense of another, the disadvantaged section of the Union had the right, the obligation to withdraw and establish a government suited to their needs.

The cotton exporting states had control of none of the branches of government in D.C. any longer. The states desiring to use tax policy to bar imports rather than pay government expenses had taken control. The South had a choice to either reorganize its economy or establish a new government. Since the Union was created to serve the states rather than the other way around, which option to choose was clear.

The North waged war on the South on the principle that it had a right to impose a rejected government upon Southerners and that resistance to it was treason and criminal.

Today, as before, those who worship the federal government flog the race issue, and slavery, because that is the only way they can justify the crime of coercing people back into the Union as moral. The rhetorical question that supposedly illustrates Southern hypocrisy is "How can the Union grant the South its freedom, when Southerners refuse to grant it to their slaves?" I ask, "If slaves deserve freedom, why don't Southerners?"

So, Confederate history needs to be taught to remind people that the promise of government by consent was broken in 1861 when Lincoln called for troops to shove a government they did not want down the throats of the people of the South with bayonets.
Posted By VoiceforHope Amee Ellsworth | about 1 year ago
I agree with you that we need to celebrate our history, but after what this woman said I am very negative about it. I will not support something that will encourage racism. I don't think every one feels this way, but this was my first exposure.
Reply By PappyYokum PappyYokum | about 1 year ago
I think you may have misinterpreted what this woman meant. There is a school a thought that believes that the descendants of slaves are deserving of compensation for slavery. Of course, the slave holders are all dead. So, the wealth transfer would have to come from somewhere else. This idea requires collectivist thinking along racial lines. I don't believe sin is inheritable. Nor is debt. People who were never slaves have no claim on those who were never slaveholders. Those who want to use the unfortunate racial history or the United States as a lever to get something for nothing are the ones guilty of promoting racism. The woman reacting by observing Confederate History Month is simply demonstrating to those attempting to inculcate a feeling of obligation in her where none is justified that she feels no shame in the Confederate History.
While I agree this is not the purest of reasons, I don't see it as promoting racism. I think your reaction is akin to saying you will not celebrate the Resurrection of Jesus on Easter because some people blame the Jews for His crucifixion and therefore promotes anti-Semitism. The redemption of mankind is the point of Easter. But, because some people get it wrong, nobody should be allowed their marshmallow chickies?
Confederate History month is about the idea that people have a right to pick and change their government and that force only settles questions of power, not of right.
Reply By VoiceforHope Amee Ellsworth | about 1 year ago
I know her. She is racist as all get out. She just won't use the "n" word.
Reply By PappyYokum PappyYokum | about 1 year ago
There is an old riddle. How many psychiatrists does it take to change a light bulb? The answer is only one, but it takes a long time and the light bulb has to want to change. The best way to change opinion is education. There is the parable of the sun and wind competing to get a coat off of a man. The change has to be voluntary. That is the only moral way. In any case, you can find information about the Constitution and the Confederacy and the war here: http://www.majorkey1920ksscv.org/scvcharge.html Happy reading.
Posted By DavaCastillo Dava Castillo | about 1 year ago
PappyYokum,

I agree the truth should be taught, and agricultural success in the South was inextricably connected to slave labor, unlike other regions where slavery was a custom rather than a financial necessity.

The schism between the North and South was fueled also by the Treaty of Paris: 1) John Jay did not make good on compensation for slaves carried off to England at the end of the Revolution. Jay was an abolitionists, so right there he conflicted with the Southern states. 2) American sailors were kidnapped by the British in the West Indies, that was not addressed. But the worst of all was that Jay bargained away and gave British imports most-favored nation status, without reciprocity from England, which was a direct hit to cotton plantation owners in the South. (To name a few of the areas of contension.)

Overall there was lot to not like about the treaty for Democratic Republicans in the South, which caused the friction--once again--between the regionalists and federalists.
Reply By PappyYokum PappyYokum | about 1 year ago
The Treaty of Paris was 1783. It was before the Constitution was written. At that time 8 of the 13 colonies had legalized slavery. The Constitution describes the United States, not as a country,or a nation, but as a Union. The States that had won their independence under the Treaty of Paris, joined the Union as individual states voluntarily. Slavery in the southern states was revived a few years later with the invention of the cotton gin. Cotton became the U.S. export. The cotton producing and exporting states built their economies around it. After the War of 1812, a high tariff was passed by Congress to pay the war debt. It was a tariff on imports because a duty on exports was prohibited under the Constitution. Since cotton exporting states were getting imports as payment most of the federal revenue came from the international cotton trade. Since the tariff for the repayment of the war debt, the southern states didn't object. By 1828 the debt was paid. The Northern manufacturing states liked the protection they got from European competitors from the tariff, so they set about passing another. This time SC protested because federal taxation was for paying government expenses only, not for the protection of domestic manufacturers. A high tariff threatened the trade in cotton. By 1860, the states involved in international trade controlled no branch of the federal government and the prospect of new ones entering the Union was near 0.
Lincoln's platform consisted of three issues: A central bank to allow the government to deficit spend; Internal improvement projects to build infrastructure which were political payoffs to Republican backers; and a protective tariff which meant the cotton exporters would pay for it all. There was nothing in this platform for the south except the tab. That is why the first seven states bolted. Without them to pay for the internal improvements, there would be no payoffs for Lincoln's backers. So Lincoln unconstitutionally called for troops to "preserve the Union." This action caused five more states to declare secession because participation in the Union was supposed to be voluntary, not coerced. Missouri and Kentucky declared secession after Federal troops invaded them.
Posted By vinnyz vinnyz | about 1 year ago
PappyYokum, Excellent post thank you for explaining the true reasons for the cause of the civil war.

Amee, You state that you don't think everyone feels this way yet at the same time also state you feel negative to the whole thing because of this one woman.

Do you think La Raza or the NAACP encourage racism?
How about the Black Panthers? How about Al Sharpton?

Do you think minority quotas for hiring,collage admission or government contracts encourage racism?

Do you suffer from white guilt?
Did you vote Obama? If so did his being black have anything to do with it? Is it racist for blacks or anybody else to vote for him due to the color of his skin?

Are you willing to give deep down thought to these questions and look deep inside yourself and give true answers?

You keep going on against racism yet I don't see you ever accuse anyone of it who isn't white. Maybe I missed it or maybe your a racist and don't even know it.
Posted By VoiceforHope Amee Ellsworth | about 1 year ago
I owe no one explanations, I am simply sharing my perception here. I did not write it as political and it is under opinion. I took your advice once, but enough already. If you don't like something, don't read it. This my observation, written as such. And I am not going to apologize.
Posted By Deepizzaguy George Vieto | about 1 year ago
Thank you for sharing this news report. Racism is wrong on all sides of the human race.
Posted By ahol888 Adrian Holman | about 1 year ago
The Confederates lost in the Civil War. They are a bunch of losers. The only reason to learn about them is so that we learn not to be racist losers like they are. The Confederates are losers.
Reply By wcarlson wcarlson | about 1 year ago
Adrian, That's about the dumbest, and least sensitive remark I've read in quite awhile. What a credit to humanity and understanding you are (NOT)! Ignorance, apathy, and lack of compassion are nothing to be proud of.
Reply By VoiceforHope Amee Ellsworth | about 1 year ago
wcarlson, older history has shown us the path to follow to avoid making the same mistakes. Currently we are seeing a rise in hate groups, politicians saying things openly that are blatantly racist (Santorum calling Obama a "ni" (he didn't finish it, but it was obvious what he was going to say))

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2lbwTMHUMkU

Then we have a governor saying liberals primary goal is to murder unborn children

http://video.search.yahoo.com/search/video?p=youtube+governor+bryant+kill+children

Hate is running rampant and if we are not careful, our nation is going to continue backsliding!
Posted By mhatter99 Martin Kloess | about 1 year ago
well written - thank you
Posted By TimHadds TimHadds | about 1 year ago
Everybody says there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY White country and ONLY into White countries.
Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY White country and ONLY White countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-Whites.
What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?
How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?
And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?
But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the White race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.
They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-White.
Anti-racist is a code word for anti-White.
Posted By wcarlson wcarlson | about 1 year ago
Amee, you wrote "Aren’t we about 200 years past all of that?". If the tremendous struggle for independence by the Southern people in 1861 was over nothing more than the institution of slavery then your question would be appropriate and we could all answer in the affirmative, but precisely because there was so much more involved, you obviously don't understand this period of history. I don't mean this as an insult because most people today (at least outside of what was once an authentic nation called The Confederate States of America), don't really understand it either. Victors in wars always get to write the "official" history of them. In the case of this war it has been necessary to present it as a struggle to free the South's slave population and to characterize it solely in this way. The government schools curriculum is clearly designed to "educate" our children with this in mind. I used the word "necessary" because if the conflict involved issues like self-government, Federalism, and the actual limits of legitimate Federal power, then people might begin to think they have the right to say NO to the Federal Government. In truth, the outcome of the war destroyed the original Republic and created the present American Empire. There is a reason why the subject of History is deemphasized both in school and in society. The ruling elites don't want the American people to really understand the past because they are so much easier to control and manipulate when they remain ignorant. I would like to challenge anyone reading my words, who believes what I like to call "The Yankee Myth of History", take the time to uncover our hidden history. A simple place to start might be going to Amazon and getting a cheap, used copy of "The South Was Right" by James and Walter Kennedy. http://www.amazon.com/The-South-Right-Walter-Kennedy/dp/1565540247
Posted By VoiceforHope Amee Ellsworth | about 1 year ago
Specifically related to the statement I made "200 years past that", I was referencing the comment made about "the slaves" (referring to black) feeling entitled. We should have evolved past statements like that long ago.

I will have to check out the book you referenced.
Advertisement
 

Blogs

 >
  • Local Flavor: St. Andrews Salt Works Raid Reenactment «

    bonniejonesphoto.wordpress.com
    I can't resist a living history reenactment… Here are are a few shots from a weekend Civil War reenactment on the beaches of nearby St. Andrews Bay. This was the site of a Confederate saltworks, where water from the bay was boiled down ...

Images

 >
 

More From Allvoices

Report Your News Got a similar story?
Add it to the network!

Or add related content to this report

 
Tap_logo_330_110_event
 


Use of this site is governed by our Terms of Use Agreement and Privacy Policy.

© Allvoices, Inc 2008-2013. All rights reserved.