
The Supreme Court is expected to reach a decision by June in Arizona v. United States, case No. 11-182. The Obama administration says that immigration is an issue to be addressed on a federal level, whereas the State of Arizona stands their ground saying this is an issue to be addressed at the state level.
The arguments over Arizona immigration laws have established a clear party line divide as other states have followed suit and implemented similar laws as well. The conservative right supports legislation that allows law enforcement officers to demand documentation from an individual to verify their legal status and the liberal left is against methods perceived as encouraging discrimination based on race.
According to Reuters: “Americans generally support immigration laws like Arizona's and are ambivalent about the federal and state roles at the core of the case, a new Reuters/Ipsos opinion poll found. About 70 percent of those surveyed favored state laws that let police check a person's immigration status and make it a crime for an illegal immigrant to work in the United States; about 30 percent opposed such measures. On the question of who has responsibility for immigration laws, the core of the Supreme Court case, 59 percent said immigration was a national issue and laws relating to it should only be made by the federal government; 55 percent said individual states had the right to make such laws, too.” http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/04/2
The first issue is to be determined by the Supreme Court -- does this power lie at the federal level or the state level. If the decision is that the power lies in the federal government, we can expect major changes in immigration laws. If the decision is that the power lies on the state level, the next step would be for states to take their stand on illegal immigration.
Illegal immigration is a hot-button item faced by legislators at every level. This issue will definitely be key in the November elections. But let’s not fool ourselves here: With a growing Hispanic population in the United States, both sides will be fighting for the Hispanic vote in November. The political arena will play this game to win votes and try to sway voters to support their agenda. As this war rages on, citizens continue being divided further and this division is toxic to this country. Tolerance for extremism seems to be increasing and the right seems to be losing their ability to hide their racist beliefs with no limits.
If you like writing about U.S. politics and the 2012 campaign, enter "The American Pundit" competition. Allvoices is awarding four $250 prizes each month between now and November. These monthly winners earn eligibility for the $5,000 grand prize, to be awarded after the November election.
Or add related content to this report
News Stories | Blogs | Images | Videos | Comments
Everybody says there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE
problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white
country and ONLY into white countries.
The Netherlands and Belgium are just as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but
nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in
millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.
Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY
white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e.,
intermarry, with all those non-whites.
What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would
be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into
EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?
How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE
problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?
And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?
But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide
against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives
will just say that I'm a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.
They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.
Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.
Everybody says there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE
problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white
country and ONLY into white countries.
The Netherlands and Belgium are just as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but
nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in
millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.
Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY
white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e.,
intermarry, with all those non-whites.
What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would
be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into
EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?
How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE
problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?
And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?
But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide
against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives
will just say that I'm a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.
They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.
Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.
This... is... racism...
To a liberal with no common sense it would be considered so.
Only because this is what you've been told to believe.
As a liberal/socialist you are a follower and need to be lead.You would rather have others decide for you than make your own decisions which is convenient as it does away with such things as personal responsibly.
You believe in strong central government regulation into most aspects of our lives because what a wonderful place the world would be if everybody was equal and how else will this come about without the iron fist of a strong leader. A perfect example of this being Iraq ,where religion and other dividers were not a major issue until the people were "liberated".
My guess is public schooling and collage where you were dumbed down and the use of common sense and thinking for your self were replaced with always obey those in charge be they teachers,police or religious leaders if you chose to follow religious teachings.
Now that YOUR leaders on the left say following the law where ILLEGAL immigration is concerned is wrong you can feel better inside thinking it's a racist law.
I'm not trying to insult you or put you down in any way. Sadly the majority of Americans are followers,as are the majority of humans. Some choose to follow the left and some choose the right then spout whatever crap they've been feed.
There are a few of us who can think for ourselves and utilize things such as common sense and see where your being lead.
We hope that enough of you on both sides will wake up,open your eyes and start thinking for yourselves.
Trying to relearn common sense is a great place to start,unfortunately though it is not as easily taught to use as it is taught to ignore.
Have a great day,though I may not agree with you I do wish upon you nothing but happiness and hope that someday you will see the truth and join with us in the fight against tyranny.
Because this is the true American way!