Q & A of the day: Do we need to rethink the Supreme Court's 'supreme power'?

Q & A of the day: Do we need to rethink the Supreme Court's 'supreme power'?

Washington : DC : USA | Apr 05, 2012 at 11:39 AM PDT
Views: Pending
Do we need to re-think the Supreme Court's absolute power?

This is not an article but a Question and Answer section. The Supreme Court is playing lead role in one high-octane drama and a few low-budget flicks.

The one we all have tickets for is the Affordable Healthcare Act now before the "Lords and Ladies" of the bench. Fans of Team Obama says the Act needs to stand and Team "Anti-healthcare" says it is unconstitutional, hoping the Court overturns the historic piece of legislation - the first in 100 years.

Another case raising eyebrows is one the Justices ruled on recently, making strip searches legal in all arrests. Strip search in all arrests? So if someone is hauled in for jumping the turnstile in the subway for they didn't have the fare, they will be strip-searched.

Then there is their ruling that Coporate Personhood should stand, opening the floodgates for enormous unchecked amounts of money to be poured into this election campaign by coporations, essentially putting the Presidency on sale like never before.

Now there is rumble among the masses that the Court's absolute power may need a bit of "reining in." Their "serve for life" positions are also being questioned. Being the ones to decide on whether we get healthcare through the Affordable Act is making others argue that they may not be the ones to do so when they receive some pretty platinum-quality insurance from the federal Government.

Then there is the partisan divide on the bench. Many argue that there is too much politics and too much ideology flowing from those robes these days to make impartial judgements.

This is some radical thinking, but those opposed say it is time for some serious re-thinking of our entire political system, including the Supreme Court, the Senate, Congress and even the Constitution.

I told you it was "way radical!"

What do you say? Don't be shy, let it rip.

1 of 19
Supreme Court rules strip search legal in all arrests
Supreme Court rules strip search legal in all arrests: next stop, the Affordable Care Act
VeronicaS is based in New York City, New York, United States of America, and is an Anchor on Allvoices.
Report Credibility
  • Clear
  • Share:
  • Share
  • Clear
  • Clear
  • Clear
  • Clear

News Stories

  • Stuck on demagoguery

      The Washington Times
    President Obama 's all-out class-warfare attack against Republicans Tuesday was a shameful litany of excuses that included blaming all of his fiscal failures on George W...His speech to the nation's news editors, which accused the GOP of budget cuts...
  • Obama reaches out to female voters

      Los Angeles Times
    President Obama tried to burnish his credentials with a crucial group of voters Friday, saying his administration would do more forwomen's health and economic status than his Republican opponents. Speaking at a White House forum on women in the...
  • This Election, Supreme Court Could Rally Democrats

      The New York Times
    For decades, Republicans have railed every four years against the Supreme Court and its perceived liberal activism to spur conservatives to elect presidents who will appoint like-minded justices. Now strategists in both parties are suggesting this...
  • Obama's Supreme Court comments lead some to question his strategy

      Washington Post
    Even some legal scholars sympathetic to Obama and the health-care law are saying that the president might have been better off keeping quiet. Presidents should generally refrain from commenting on pending cases during the process of judicial...
  • No 'Embarrassment' for NYT's Greenhouse, Even After 'Simply Wrong' Side ...

    Former New York Times Supreme Court reporter Linda Greenhouse, last spotted (before the Supreme Court's arguments on Obama-care) calling skeptics of the law's constitutionality "simply wrong," was defiant in her online column Wednesday, even after...
  • Obama, Health Care, and the Nine Supreme Court Justices

      Canadian Free Press
    The Constitution gives that authority to the federal courts nowhere within the text of the document...However, the Supreme Court's opinion of a law, through the use of Judicial Review, is not a completely worthless thing, either. Constitutionally,...





More From Allvoices

Report Your News Got a similar story?
Add it to the network!

Or add related content to this report

Use of this site is governed by our Terms of Use Agreement and Privacy Policy.

© Allvoices, Inc. 2008-2014. All rights reserved. Powered by PulsePoint.