The present day political discourse reflects a deeply divided, partisan government and media who are both hell-bent on corralling its citizens into falling in two straight rows behind party lines.
Both Republicans and Democrats on Capitol Hill are guilty of promoting the partisan rife for it scores political points in Washington and at the polls. Some pander shamelessly to their base while others truly believe the polarizing rhetoric they preach.
But the current onslaught on women's reproductive rights, shocking recommendation for our children's education, more proposed tax breaks for the wealthy and frenzied cries for more Middle East wars seem to emanate more from the Republican Party.
The final four on the campaign trail are certainly ratcheting up their stump speeches with Rick Santorum leading the pack in extreme ideology. Birth control is a sin and bad for America, sex outside of marriage, immoral; higher education is snobbery--the list goes on and on.
Ron Paul, the Libertarian who champions free will, individual civil liberties and less government interference in our lives, awkwardly danced away from an opportunity to speak his truth or rather what he used to profess was his truth--when confronted with the birth control issue. "Society's immorality causes us to want to use the pill" was his argument. Really.
Crowds cheer speeches peppered with this archaic rhetoric so at least a certain segment of our population subscribe to that narrow, impractical, ideology. Poor Mitt Romney tried to give an intelligent, practical response to the birth control question and he is seen as not Conservative enough.
So rational answers are now deemed too Liberal, not Conservative enough? What happened to the Republican party? Would President Abe Lincoln and even Ronald Reagan be allowed in this current group?
Speaking on HBO's "Real Time with Bill Maher" on Friday March 2, author John Heilemann had this to say, "...The Republican party is becoming, just truly becoming a whiter, more blue-collar, more populist, less well-educated party and more of a religious party..."
Bold, brave, hard-hitting and in your face analysis. Do you think he is speaking the brutal truth or do you vehemently disagree?
Don't be shy, voice your opinions below.
Or add related content to this report
News Stories | Blogs | Images | Videos | Comments
I think that's exactly the way he chooses to view them. I don't however, believe it's accurate. I know too many highly intelligent Republicans who put the Constitution ahead of their religion; I know plenty of stupid Democrats that don't... really, that doesn't say anything about either group except that they both have a few idiots with big mouths...
Meaning that liberals in general keep on trying to reverse human nature and the laws of biology. How much more ignorant can one get than that?
Marriage is what it is and what has been defined for tens of centuries. Marriage and Gay is an oxymoron. It's like male lesbian.
There is no reason gay unions cannot be recognized as such and legislation passed to insure rights of legacy. Rights of progeny cannot be insured since men cannot get pregnant yet, as I had pointed out above, though some liberals keep on trying. I wish them the best of luck.
Republicans can't even say the word "gay" at their quadrennial national conventions. Republicans hate gays. They loathe them.
Why any gay with any self-respect would be or want to be a Republican defies logic. Well, unless they're just self-loathing.
Really? I'm a Tea Party Republican and have given both time and money to support gay rights and gay marriage. I know lots of others like me who feel the same way...
Clearly, you're painting with too broad a brush...
What have you done to support them, if you don't mind me asking?
Have you forgotten that it was a Democrat president(Clinton) that signed the Defense of Marriage act into law... selective amnesia? I know as many Republicans who support gay marriage as Democrats.
Nobody wants to slash services to disabled or elderly; that's spin... what we need is to revamp the programs so they do more for the ones that need it, and are viable and sustainable into the future... none of our current entitlements meet that criteria.
I also believe that the religion is their way of not having to embrace complex social issues. They can ask God to take care of everything. That, too, is dangerous. They certainly do not like change, nor do they want to give way to new ideas and ways of thinking. Although there are educated Republicans, one area in which they are sparse is in the Sciences!
What is scary is religous facism - of any kind. Muslim, Christian, or any other kind that assumes the right to compel others to follow their religious beliefs. The founding fathers were wise to prohibit the creation of any state religion, while still gauranteeing the right to practice whatever religion you subscribe to, but not to to impose your religious beliefs on others, through force, threat, or law.
As one left-leaning blogger said about the OWS crowd, after spending several days in their midst: "They know only propaganda. They dont know any facts to back their arguments up!" He also, btw, remarked on their totalitarian hypocricy.
You realize Marx was Russian, right?
Oh, never mind.
It's all good for the humor. However sad.
That was good. Thanks.
'Ant-American anti-Capitalist regime."
Really. Thanks.