The GOP and gun control policy
Linkedin

The GOP and gun control policy

Washington : DC : USA | Mar 03, 2012 at 1:50 PM PST
XX XX
Views: Pending
 
Legal Facts & Information : What Will Show Up on a Background Check?

As Republican presidential candidates vie for the GOP nomination, the field narrows and the remianing contenders will further define and differentiate themselves from each other on the issues. With gun violence last year involving Arizona congresswoman Gabby Giffords and the mass shootings by Jared Loughner that left six killed and 14 injured together with the tragedy at Chardon High School last week, the public conversation is turning to gun law legislation and where the candidates stand on gun control.

Mitt Romney

Romney’s views are murky and appear to have changed. In February he said, “find common ground with pro-gun and anti-gun groups. In the past he signed the nation’s first ban on assault weapons in Massachusetts as governor and increased gun owners fees by 400%. How does he propose to reconcile this with groups like the National Rifle Association (NRA), the most powerful gun lobby in the U.S.?

He proposes legislation that is crafted both by the pro-gun lobby and the anti-gun lobby. The pro-gun lobby said "this legislation allows us to cross roads with weapons when we're hunting that had not been previously allowed." And the day when we announced our signing, we had both the pro-gun owners and anti-gun folks all together on the stage because it worked. We worked together. We found common ground.

“My view is that we have the Second Amendment right to bear arms and my view is also that we should not add new legislation. I know that there are people that think we need new laws. I disagree with that. I believe we have in place all the laws we need. We should enforce those laws. I do not believe in new laws restricting gun ownership and gun use.”

In 2002 when he ran for governor, he supported a ban on assault rifles and the Brady Bill's five-day waiting period for gun purchases. He proudly said those positions wouldn't make him "the hero of the NRA." As governor, he made Massachusetts the first state to permanently ban assault weapons.

He has even flip-flopped about whether he owns any guns. In New Hampshire, he was asked his view on the Second Amendment. He responded that he had been a hunter "pretty much all my life." Later, red-faced aides of Romney had to admit that Romney had never had a hunting license, and under further questioning, Romney acknowledged that his "lifetime of hunting" was having shot at some birds during a Republican governors meeting during a fund-raising event and maybe shooting at "small varmints" when he was 17 with his cousin.

With these statistics it’s difficult to define and more importantly predict what Romney’s gun policies would be if he were elected president.

Newt Gingrich

Gingrich believes that the Supreme Court has become a permanent constitutional convention in which the whims of five appointed lawyers have rewritten the meaning of the Constitution. And furthermore, anyone who thinks various Supreme Court decisions are not adequately worrisome need only look at the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals to see how domination by secular left-liberal judges will change America. He views the court decisions to be “out of step with the views of the vast majority of the American people.”

Let’s take a look at what the “vast majority of Americans” think. The facts do not support Gingrich’s statements. After the assault and mass shootings in Tucson, Ariz., last year, Americans remain split on the issue of gun control with the scale tipping to more controls, according to a new CBS News/New York Times poll.

The poll results revealed that 46 percent of Americans think gun laws should be made stricter, while 38 percent want them to stay the same. Thirteen percent said they thought gun control laws should be made less strict. In a similar poll conducted in April 2010, 40 percent of Americans thought gun laws should be made tougher, while 42 percent wanted them to stay the same. Sixteen percent wanted them to be made less strict.

Public support for a nationwide ban on assault weapons has risen. Sixty-three percent of voters said they would support such a ban, up from 54 percent in 2009.

Gingrich believes in the absolute right to gun ownership. While in Congress, Gingrich voted against the 1993 Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act that was eventually enacted and required background checks for those purchasing firearms. Two years later he voted in favor of the Gun Free School Zone Act, which made it illegal to be in possession of a gun while in a school zone. The second was the Domestic Violence Offenders Act. This legislation made it illegal for anyone convicted of domestic violence to own a firearm

While running for the presidency, Gingrich has been very vocal in his support for Second Amendment rights. In a speech to the NRA, Gingrich stated that the Second Amendment was not put in the Constitution to affirm the people's right to vote, but rather to allow them to defend themselves from the government.

In December of 2011, Gingrich filled out the Gun Owners of American survey in which he took a pro-Second Amendment stance on all questions. This included stating he would support the repeal of the Domestic Violence legislation and the Gun Free School Zone Act. These are the two pieces of legislation that he was instrumental in passing in 1996.

With these astonishing statistics it’s anyone’s guess as to what his policies as president would be.

Rick Santorum

Santorum has the distinction of having a lifetime A+ rating with the NRA.

He did, however, vote in support of requiring trigger locks on handguns, and voted for background checks on firearm purchases made at gun shows.

Both of these positions are supported by the NRA and were initiated during the Clinton administration.

One of the reasons Santorum gets his A+ rating with the NRA is his voting against the ban on assault weapons. He described his vote with the NRA as follows, “they [NRA] supported, and worked with me to make sure that we'd not have something far worse pass. And so sometimes you have to pass something that can get enough votes to be able to satisfy folks that they won't pass something that's much worse. And so that's what you have to do to make sure that rights aren't taken away. I have a lifetime A-plus record with the NRA. They came to me repeatedly when I was in the Senate to help them and sponsor legislation and work toward making sure in ensuring gun rights.”

His voting record on gun legislation: No on banning lawsuits against gun manufacturers for gun violence; No on background checks at gun shows; Yes on loosening license and background checks at gun shows; Yes on maintaining current law; guns sold without trigger locks.

With these statistics Americans would definitely know what Santorum’s gun policies would be.

Conclusion

The people’s choice for the Republicans will ultimately be pitted against President Obama’s positions on gun control in November.

The president’s position is states and cities should be able to determine local gun laws; however the federal government has the right to increase state restrictions on gun purchases.

The president believes as a general principle, the Constitution confers an individual right to bear arms. But just because you have an individual right does not mean that the state or local government can’t constrain the exercise of that right, in the same way that we have a right to private property but local governments can establish zoning ordinances that determine how you can use it.

Registration and licensing of guns requires a common sense approach to guns ending up on our city streets. We can make sure that criminals don’t have guns in their hands. We can make certain that those who are mentally deranged are not getting a hold of handguns. We can trace guns that have been used in crimes to unscrupulous gun dealers who may be selling to straw purchasers and dumping them on the streets.

Principles of President Obama on gun issues: Stop unscrupulous gun dealers from dumping guns in the cities; ban the sale or transfer of all forms of semi automatic weapons; increase state restrictions on the purchase and possession firearms; require manufacturers to provide child safety locks with firearms. In the past he has been against prohibiting lawsuits against gun manufacturers. This would make manufacturers, distributors, dealers, or importers of firearms and ammunition liable for damages resulting from the misuse of their products by others.

Resources

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20029126-503544.html

http://www.issues2000.org/2012/Newt_Gingrich_Gun_Control.htm

http://www.issues2000.org/2012/Mitt_Romney_Gun_Control.htm

http://www.thepoliticalguide.com/Profiles/House/Georgia/Newt_Gingrich/Views/The_Second_Amendment/

http://www.issues2000.org/2012/Barack_Obama_Gun_Control.htm

Back
1 of 2
Next
gun legislation
Where do the Republicans stand on gun legislation and how do they match up with President Obama's policies?
Dava Castillo is based in Clearlake, California, United States of America, and is an Anchor for Allvoices.
Report Credibility
 
  • Clear
  • Share:
  • Share
  • Clear
  • Clear
  • Clear
  • Clear
 
 
Advertisement
 
Posted By MaxHaul MaxHaul | over 1 year ago
Right to bear arms means right of the people of the states to defend their life or property through an organized armed militia rather than dependent upon a standing army for this purpose, which was always strongly denounced as the biggest threat to liberty. See:

http://www.federalistblog.us/2010/09/second_amendment_fallacies
Posted By DavaCastillo Dava Castillo | over 1 year ago
Thank you for commenting Maxhaul.

The statistics speak for themselves. You are more apt to be killed using a firearm, than harmed by or have your rights hindered by any U.S. gun control legislation.

Number of people killed by guns in the United States in 2004: 29,569

Percentage breakdown by US gun deaths in 2004, by type:

* 16,750 suicides (56% of all U.S. gun deaths)
* 11,624 homicides (40%)
* 649 unintentional shootings, 311 from legal intervention and 235 from undetermined intent (4%).

That averages out to 81 people dying everyday from guns. And also some gun ownership stats:

More than 100 million handguns are owned in the United
States primarily for self‐defense, and 3.5 million people have permits to carry concealed handguns for protection. Currently, the population of the U.S. is around 300 million people.

Source(s):

http://twocrabs.blogs.com/2crabs/2007/04…
http://www.law.harvard.edu/students/orgs…
Posted By VeronicaS VeronicaS | over 1 year ago
Thanks for the informative article Dava. Gun enthusiasts love to use the argument guns don't kill people, people kill people--which I find to be one of the most disingenuous arguments out there.

The GOP don't want to mess with the right to bear arms amendment but they are fighting hard to strip women of their reproductive rights. We see where their Priorities lie.

Funny their staunch pro-life stanch doesn't include killing with guns.
Posted By DavaCastillo Dava Castillo | over 1 year ago
Thanks for commenting Veronica.

Whenever I hear that argument--guns don't kill people, people do--I want to say tell that to the family and friends of those who are killed using guns.
Posted By StephEaly Stephanie Ealy | over 1 year ago
I personally despise guns and do not own any, but I do not believe in so much govt. control. I personally believe more laws are not the answer because some people are going to do what they want no matter what the laws and the responsible gun owners end up imprisoned to BIG govt which strips us of our freedoms. BTW, I love the pic!
Posted By DavaCastillo Dava Castillo | over 1 year ago
Thank you for commenting Steph.

I know you support Ron Paul and his platform of less government. I believe in shared governance because the states don't always make the right decisions and government intervention is needed. The Civil Right's Act is a excellent example of government stepping in when state's are governed by prejudice like the Southern States were back in the 1960s when the Civil Rights Act was made into law.

In the case of the Civil Rights Act, government expanded and ensured the rights of all people and reinstated the rights the states had striped from African Americans like equal access and unfettered voting.

In terms of guns, the ban on assault weapons ran from 1994-2004. We still do not have a federal law against them to renew the ban. I favor this as an appropriate federal government precedent, not an infringement on my rights to bear arms.

From wikipedia:

The Federal Assault Weapons Ban (AWB) (or Public Safety and Recreational Firearms Use Protection Act) was a subtitle of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994, a federal law in the United States that included a prohibition on the manufacture for civilian use of certain semi-automatic firearms, so called "assault weapons". There was no legal definition of "assault weapons" in the U.S. prior to the law's enactment. The 10-year ban was passed by Congress on September 13, 1994, and was signed into law by President Bill Clinton the same day. The ban only applied to weapons manufactured after the date of the ban's enactment.

The Federal Assault Weapons Ban expired on September 13, 2004, as part of the law's sunset provision. There have been multiple attempts to renew the ban,[1] but no bill has reached the floor for a vote.
Posted By atifji75 atifji75 | over 1 year ago
Well Written And Nice Presentation. Thanks For Sharing. Rated Up.
Posted By Deepizzaguy George Vieto | over 1 year ago
Thank you for sharing this news story.
Posted By Punditty Punditty | over 1 year ago
I have added a story I wrote for Allvoices some time ago under the "news stories" tab, above. The problem with gun control is that it can (can, not always) prevent law-abiding citizens from being able to protect themselves. Guns are not just going to magically go away if we implemented stricter controls. The smartest policy, IMHO, is too educate children and young adults about the power of firearms and the damage they can do. See the article for details.

Thanks for writing about this, Dava. We may disagree, but it is an important issue and one that should be discussed during the campaign.
Posted By itobin53 itobin53 | over 1 year ago
its pretty widely accepted that the GOP is in bed with the NRA. So to say the words "gun control" and republican in the same breath is an oxymoron.

The GOP does not want gun control they want guns out of control cuz that what the NRA tells them. They are like little puppets on a string ignoring what's best for the public.

This country is taking a sad turn off the cliff of crazy
Advertisement
 

News Stories

 
  • America’s youth deserve a better shot at firearms education in cities, public schools

    Submitted By: Punditty | over 1 year ago
      Firearms are a fact of life, just like drugs, and like drugs they can be abused or used in beneficial ways. Just as some drug education programs have been shown to be effective in preventing drug abuse, could it be that smart firearms education ...
  • In South, Mitt Romney’s attacks against rivals more subtle

    Washington Post
    Mitt Romney campaigned Sunday in his most unfriendly territory the South and did not mention either of his two top rivals for the Republican presidential nomination.  Romney did not bring up Newt Gingrich, even though the former GOP presidential...
  • Super PACs keep candidates in the game despite growing odds

    Fox News
    As Republican-supporting Super PACs spend millions to keep their candidates in the presidential primary race, key Republicans are circling the wagons around Mitt Romney in hopes that Super Tuesday victories will create an air of inevitability as...
  • Super Tuesday: Mitt Romney focuses on economy, while rivals seek openings

    Washington Post
    A win here by the former Massachusetts governor would reinforce the idea that his nomination is inevitable, while a loss to Santorum, who was leading in the Ohio polls until recently, could extend the nominating battle into a state-by-state slog...
  • Rivals blast Romney as big day nears

    Boston Globe
    Mitt Romney came under fierce assault from his Republican primary opponents on Sunday as the campaign headed to the crucial 10-state slate of Super Tuesday contests, with Newt Gingrich accusing the former Massachusetts governor's campaign of...
  • Santorum moves to shore up support before Super Tuesday

    Washington Post
    Although none of the four remaining candidates have signaled that Tuesday's results would end their runs, a recent string of five back-to-back wins by Mitt Romney has strengthened his standing as his rivals continue to fight over the not-Romney title.

Blogs

 >
  • How prolonged does a criminal track record check out state

    www.enterpriseafrica.org
    It is a common thinking of the people that background check is the tedious job. If you are attending the interview, you need to fill up the form of employment background check. You need to give your conduct certificate. The background check ...
  • Giving People the Right to Respond to Background Checks ...

    www.backgroundcheck.biz
    Let's just say you're an employer who is carrying out background checks on potential employees as part of your screening process. What happens if.
  • Bill would require finger-print background checks for nursing home ...

    bluegrasspolitics.bloginky.com
    Long-term care facilities would not have to pay for the background check until the federal grant runs out in 2014. After that, long-term care facilities could either pay for the background checks or pass the cost on to job applicants, said Mary ...
  • Free People Search and Background Check Service Guidance ...

    frankiegarciascannibalandtheheadhunters.com
    Before the net came along it was a large offer to operate a background check on somebody – pricey, also. Virtually all background checks had been completed by non-public investigators who would personally visit county courthouses to view ...

Images

 >
 

More From Allvoices

Report Your News Got a similar story?
Add it to the network!

Or add related content to this report

 
Tap_logo_330_110_event
 


Use of this site is governed by our Terms of Use Agreement and Privacy Policy.

© Allvoices, Inc 2008-2013. All rights reserved.