Allvoices Writers’ Resources: better tags for better page views
Local to Global News
 
 Connect 
Sign up now!

Allvoices Writers’ Resources: better tags for better page views

Berkeley : CA : USA | Feb 06, 2012 at 6:40 PM PST
12 0
Views: 216
 

Feb. 6, 2012

Proud 20th-century relic that he is, Punditty learned to read and write before computers were commonly found in homes and spiders were eight-legged creepy crawlies, not part of “the web.”

Times change, however, as does terminology. This Allvoices Writers’ Resources report takes a look at relevant terminology and practical tips for Allvoices writers who want to increase their page views. Specifically, it will discuss how to best tag your Allvoices report so that readers looking for information on what you are writing about can more readily find your story.

A basic understanding of tags – words and phrases that help identify your content for search engines – can help Allvoices writers looking to pull in new readers searching for articles. The term “SEO” stands for “Search Engine Optimization,” which basically means making a particular report easier to find online through a search engine like Google or Bing.

The bottom line is this: When Allvoices asks you for tags, ask yourself what search terms you would use if you were searching for the information found in your report.

A good way to illustrate this point is to discuss a hypothetical presidential news conference held on Feb. 3, 2012. Suppose President Obama took a total of 10 questions on five different topics in an hour-long appearance before reporters. Let’s say the first three questions were about the state of the economy and that most writers summing up their reports on the Obama news conference focused on its economic aspects.

But suppose one of the questions to Obama was about the campaign promise he made to work toward reducing the number of abortions in the United States while simultaneously maintaining policies that vigorously defended a woman’s right to choose. Although the president may only have 20 or 30 words to say about it, a writer choosing to focus on this aspect of the news conference would begin his or her report with an emphasis on that portion of the news conference.

In that sense, tags are like reinforcements for your headline. As you may remember from a previous Writers’ Resource, the headline you give your report is saved as part of the URL (Uniform Resource Locator) and is crucial in helping search engines recognize your report for what it is. So let’s say you write about the abortion angle of the news conference and give your report the following headline: “Obama says he still supports reducing U.S. abortions but offers no specifics.”

Focus on reinforcing the headline or the main point of your report with the tags. Allvoices allows 10 tags per story, which can be one word or a phrase. They are separated by commas, as in the following example:

Obama abortion news conference, Obama reduce abortions, Obama abortion, Obama asked about abortion, Obama pro-choice, other Obama news conference topics, pro-choice, reporter Obama abortion, Roe v. Wade, Obama news conference Feb. 3 2012

These are all search terms that someone interested in the topic might use to find more information about that aspect of the news conference. Note that each term is relatively short – would you ever type “Obama says he still wants to support reductions in abortions” into Google? Keep your tags short and sweet but still useful.

In contrast, let’s say another Allvoices writer published an analysis of the economic issues covered in the news conference with this headline: “Obama optimistic about economy, says things are getting better across the U.S.” Obviously, this writer would not use the same tags, even though the report is about the same event. Tags like the following would be more appropriate for that report:

Obama economy, better economy Obama, unemployment Obama, stock market Obama, economic news, Obama more jobs, Obama reporters economy, recession, economy getting getter, Obama news conference Feb. 3 2012

The date of the news conference is given as an example of a tag that would work for both reports and illustrates the importance of proper comma usage in tags. If you were writing the date in a report, there would be a comma between “3" and "2012." But a comma would change the meaning of the tag and turn it into “Obama news conference Feb. 3, 2012” which is actually two tags: “Obama news conference Feb. 3” and “2012.”

There are a ton of websites that go into greater detail about tags and SEO strategies, with some suggested reading linked to below. This report, however, should give you a basic understanding of what tags do and help you begin tagging your reports more effectively.

This article is part of the official Allvoices Writers' Resources Series. Stay tuned for more online journalism tips and tricks from Punditty.

SOURCES & RESOURCES

Associated Press Stylebook

How important are meta tags now? SEO Logic, www.seologic.com

Tagging blog posts and photos, about.com

ADDITIONAL ALLVOICES WRITERS’ RESOURCES REPORTS

Write better headlines, get more readers for your reports, Nov. 22, 2011

Linking to sources improves reliability of your reports, Nov. 30, 2011

Commenting on other reports builds community, leads to additional interest in your work, Dec. 31, 2011

5 tips for American Pundit writers, Jan. 20, 2012

Back
1 of 1
Next
Allvoices Writers' Resources - tags
Allvoices Writers' Resources, Presented by Punditty

Punditty is based in Berkeley, California, United States of America, and is an Anchor for Allvoices.
Report Credibility
 
 
  • Clear
  • Share:
  • Share
  • Clear
  • Clear
  • Clear
  • Clear
 
 
Advertisement
 
Posted By Punditty Punditty | 4 months ago
Links to other Allvoices Writers' Resource reports will be fixed soon...thank you for your patience.
Reply By Kokuaguy Kokuaguy | 3 months ago
Great -- you read my mind. I was going to ask you about other resources like this. Hope your day is going well. With sincere aloha, Kokuaguy in Honolulu
Posted By pijushmitra Pijush Mitra | 4 months ago
Great tips, thanks for sharing...
Posted By mhatter99 Martin Kloess | 4 months ago
well written - thank you
Posted By GeorgeMcGinn George McGinn | 4 months ago
Punditty - I have some questions. In the list of tags, doesn't Google penalize you for repeating the same word? In the abortion tags, you mention abortion 5 out of 9 tags?

My other question has to do with multiple word tags. Some of your tags are almost sentences. Will the search engine pick one word out of the group of words?

For example, in your tag "other Obama news conference topics" if I put in a search for "news" or "conference" or "topic", will the Google search engine find your story?

I have been always told that single- or two-word tags are better, and that the Google search engine will ignore reports with repeat word tags.

Thanks for this article on tags, as that for me is the most confusing part of SEO.
Reply By Punditty Punditty | 4 months ago
Hi George,

I honestly don't know the answer to your questions. I only began researching tags a couple weeks ago and thought I could share some of what I learned. You may be correct about how Google weighs reports with multiple word tags.

As I learn more, I will update this report.
Posted By irvincohen irvincohen | 4 months ago
Dear Punditty,

I too grew up in an ancient era of pen, pencil and paper, and bulky and often messy and difficult to manage typewriters. And yes indeed, it was a backwards and primitive world with neither word processors nor let alone, computers.

So I too as a product of those same prehistoric, neolithic and paleolithic times, empathize with you. But while most of us, nay, make that some of us, were learning good grammar and diction and a fewer still subordination and style and flair - I unfortunately never learned any of that good stuff. So I truly speak upon tenuous grounds and with great trepidation when I say:

Paragraph (graff in computer-ese) six, last sentence - "…report on with…" is grammatically incorrect. The preposition "on" represents a redundancy and is unnecessary. It should read “...report with...” You know the conventional dictate of never ending a sentence with a preposition, even though it might appear to be somewhat arbitrary, I maintain is usually a good rule of thumb/principle to follow. Well the same with running two or more prepositions together.


But as to your main issue and theme of “tags” - I am sorry but I must respectfully demur and disagree with you somewhat. I view these as the tools of lazy, un-inquisitive minds. Furthermore, these “tags” are by their very own nature shallow, misleading and usually irrelevant to the central and main point(s) of the article.

Now I ain’t no Luddite - I literally can’t return to the past, that is to say, I can’t live without my computer. (Although I have serious qualms about the internet, but that’s a whole other can of worms beyond the scope of this comment.)

And so I must also confess that I am a traditionalist (and somewhat of an Antiquarian to boot). And as such, I see a mutual individual and personal responsibility for both writer and reader: for the writer to write the article well enough so as to engender interest and curiosity in the subject. And for the reader; first, to actually read the damn thing before making and passing judgements; and secondly, if so moved, to do some damn research on his or her own part.

Well, I guess I’ve offended enough people for one day.

Irv,
Reply By GeorgeMcGinn George McGinn | 3 months ago
Maybe this is why I am having trouble understanding tags. If you are "old school" journalist like me, you could think of the the story's "slug" as a tag or set of tags????

Oh, I forgot to let everyone know that in journalism, a slug is a 1 to 3 word (mostly 1 word) that accurately describes the story.

"But as to your main issue and theme of “tags” - I am sorry but I must respectfully demur and disagree with you somewhat. I view these as the tools of lazy, un-inquisitive minds. Furthermore, these “tags” are by their very own nature shallow, misleading and usually irrelevant to the central and main point(s) of the article."
Reply By Punditty Punditty | 4 months ago
Hi Irvin,

You wrote:
Paragraph (graff in computer-ese) six, last sentence - "…report on with…" is grammatically incorrect. The preposition "on" represents a redundancy and is unnecessary. It should read “...report with...” You know the conventional dictate of never ending a sentence with a preposition, even though it might appear to be somewhat arbitrary, I maintain is usually a good rule of thumb/principle to follow. Well the same with running two or more prepositions together.


I write:
It was a typo, but you've certainly shown yourself to be quite the grammarian.
Posted By prabirghose prabirghose | 4 months ago
thanks for giving us an insight into the intricate world of SEOs ... allvoices writers would certainly benefit from such relevant topics and clues ...
Posted By Punditty Punditty | 4 months ago
It's an ongoing learning experience, prabirghose, but every little bit of knowledge helps.
Posted By irvincohen irvincohen | 4 months ago
Dear Punditty,

No sweat.

As for "…quite the grammarian…" Yes, I must confess and admit as such, I am also quite the anal aperture.

However care to comment on my take on "tags." Trust me, it won't be on the final.

Irv,
Posted By StephEaly Stephanie Ealy | 4 months ago
Excellent report, thanks for the help Punditty!
Posted By greenorange greenorange | 4 months ago
I actually wish I hadn't noticed this as I actually want 1 now!
Posted By hmichaelharvey Harold Michael Harvey | 4 months ago
This has been a helpful discussion. I always stumble when it comes time to writing tags and this article has benefited me more than any others, that I have read.
Posted By DavaCastillo Dava Castillo | 3 months ago
thanks for the report Punditty.

I need the additional information on SEO, and this helped build my knowledge.
Posted By dhreff dhreff | 3 months ago
Thank you for these guidelines on how to improve views of one's news reports. rate you up.
Posted By wrobertweller wrobertweller | 3 months ago
This would have been valuable a couple of years ago. If this information is up-to-date everyone would be doing it so it would cancel itself out. And as the Google Webmaster says tricks like this result in a negative viewer experience. Punditty is a good writer and doesn't need this.
Reply By Punditty Punditty | 3 months ago
It is a learning experience, this SEO stuff. I will continue to investigate and either write a new report or update this one as I learn more.
Posted By wrobertweller wrobertweller | 3 months ago
Read the Mail Online Daily. That is how it is done. I think it can be done in the same manner with perhaps a different choice of subject matter. Check out Rubicon Crossings.
Posted By wrobertweller wrobertweller | 3 months ago
the not ending sentences with prepositions applies to Latin. Churchill said something like "it is something up with i will not put."
Posted By CATALINABELENAMARTINEZ CATALINA BELEÑA MARTINEZ | 3 months ago
Very good. Thank you very much because I let things clearer. Thanks again.
Advertisement
 

Related Allvoices Contributions

 
Advertisement
 

Images

 >
 
Report Your News Got a similar story?
Add it to the network!

Or add related content to this report

 
Tap_logo_330_103

Sitemap


Use of this site is governed by our Terms of Use Agreement and Privacy Policy.

© Allvoices, Inc 2008-2012. All rights reserved.