Senate passes National Defense Authorization Act, White House warns of veto
Linkedin

Senate passes National Defense Authorization Act, White House warns of veto

Seattle : WA : USA | Dec 02, 2011 at 9:39 PM PST
XX XX
Views: Pending
 
The Patriot Act - part 1

The United States Senate has passed its edition of a bill that would empower the military to forever detain anyone who is considered to be part of any terrorist activity. Ninety three Senators reportedly voted in favor of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), while seven opposed it and none abstained.

The National Defense Authorization Act allows funds amounting $662 billion for the U.S. wars in Afghanistan and Iraq and military personnel. According to provisions of Subtitle D of the act, the U.S. military can indefinitely detain anybody, devoid of assuring a trial.

According to the rules of the business, the House will also vote on the bill. It will then square its version of the bill with that of the Senate prior to sending the legislation to the president. It should be noted that in late May the House held a roll call over the bill. The occasion was noted for 322 Representatives supporting the bill, 96 opposing it, while 13 abstained from taking part in the proceedings.

Later on, the Senate came up with a concession amendment in a 99-1 vote. The amendment stated that the National Defense Authorization Act will not affect the existing legal power of the government to jail people captured in the war on terrorism.

Meanwhile, the Obama administration has accused the Senate of political micromanagement of national security. The White House on Friday reiterated its stand to veto a defense bill over the provisions of Subtitle D of National Defense Authorization Act that relates to controversial military detentions of anyone including all U.S. citizens.

It should be noted that in November the Obama administration said that its senior advisers would recommend a veto, stating the detention provisions of the bill could put a limit around the ability of law enforcers to fight terrorism and could make the task of putting off terrorist attacks more difficult.

"Republican and Democratic administrations ... have said that the language in this bill would jeopardize our national security by restricting flexibility in our fight against al Qaeda," White House spokesman Jay Carney said in his daily briefing Friday. "By ignoring these nonpartisan recommendations -- including the recommendations of the secretary of defense, the director of the FBI, the director of national Intelligence and the attorney general -- the Senate has unfortunately engaged in a little political micromanagement at the expense of sensible national security policies."

Analysts also fear that the bill could possibly lead to non-cooperation from allies who may not agree with the U.S. authorities on indefinite detentions. The allies could likely be reluctant to give U.S. authorities leads about terrorists.

Jennifer Rees is based in Seattle, Washington, United States of America, and is an Anchor for Allvoices.
Report Credibility
 
  • Clear
  • Share:
  • Share
  • Clear
  • Clear
  • Clear
  • Clear
 
 
Advertisement
 
Advertisement
 

News Stories

 
  • White House renews veto threat on defense bill

    Bradenton Herald
    tool goes here The White House on Friday accused the Democratic-controlled Senate of "political micromanagement" at the expense of national security after it approved legislation requiring military custody of suspected terrorists, even those captured...
  • US Senator Robert Casey wants human rights in Sri Lanka: But supports ...

    Asian Tribune
    Committee in which he is a member, petitioning to Secretary Clinton and President Obama, is well heard in the diplomatic corridors in Washington stretching through the American Embassy in Colombo to Sri Lanka government power centers. His voice is so...
  • Senate votes not to vote on indefinite detention on Americans

    War In Context
    Thursday evening the Senate added a compromise amendment to the defense spending bill that states: Maybe. Specifically, it says the bill does not alter current authorities relating to detention, leaving either side free to argue whether current law...
  • U.S. Senate adopts vast military spending bill

    Taiwan News
    The US Senate on Thursday approved a vast military spending bill that tied strings to military aid to Pakistan and aimed to stem the spread of shoulder-fired anti-aircraft missiles from Libya "> Libya . The $662 billion annual Defense Authorization...
  • Corker and Alexander Vote For Indefinite Detention of U.S. Citizens

    Nashville Scene
    Politics Corker and Alexander Vote For Indefinite Detention of U.S. Citizens Posted by Jonathan Meador on Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 4:10 PM The U.S...American citizens on U.S. soil; do away with pesky due process for those citizens; and effectively declare...

Blogs

 >
  • Andrew McCarthy takes on Judge Napolitano over McCain-Levin ...

    www.therightscoop.com
    Domestic investigations and arrests are still to be handled by the FBI and other law-enforcement authorities; the military still limits itself to combat ops overseas. This is exactly how things worked pre-McCain-Levin: In 1942, American citizen ...
  • PATRIOT Act clouds picture for tech – POLITICO.com Print View ...

    mbcalyn.com
    Laws in some countries allow governments to request private information from companies — and the fear is that this information could be turned over to U.S. authorities under the anti-terrorist law. “It's not at this point, I think, entirely clear
  • apex court held yes= court means any court of civil and criminal ...

    advocatemmmohan.wordpress.com
    apex court held yes= court means any court of civil and criminal. award means any compromise decree is called as decree as per legal services authority act= The question posed for consideration is that when a criminal case filed under ...
  • Pie N Politics » Letter from Mark Baird 12-2-11

    pienpolitics.com
    We are engaged in acts of disobedience to state and federal authorities. We have been successful because we have the truth on our side. We must never quit or waver in our resolve to represent the truth. It is not illegal to disobey illegal order. ...

More From Allvoices

Report Your News Got a similar story?
Add it to the network!

Or add related content to this report

 
Tap_logo_330_110_event
 


Use of this site is governed by our Terms of Use Agreement and Privacy Policy.

© Allvoices, Inc 2008-2013. All rights reserved.