Ruminations on Teacher Pay and High Stakes Testing

Ruminations on Teacher Pay and High Stakes Testing

West Chester : PA : USA | Oct 31, 2011 at 11:42 AM PDT
Views: Pending

There is a tendency for American teachers to be treated like factory workers. They receive little recognition, a meager salary, and their training after hire consists of professional development that rarely fosters much growth. Since a mediocre teacher earns the same salary as a high-quality teacher, there is little monetary incentive to strive to become an excellent educator. In addition, No Child Left Behind holds teachers entirely responsible for their students’ performance on state achievement tests, regardless of the many variables that influence students’ performance on these tests. For example, it is extremely difficult, if not impossible, to prepare a sixth grade student reading at a second grade level to perform well on a state achievement test. It is no wonder that standardized testing has caused schools and teachers to panic.

Generally, students’ performances on tests are considered to be directly attributable to the instruction they receive from their regular teachers. Many teachers lose their jobs every year because of poor standardized test scores. Our current educational assessment system refuses to take into account all extraneous variables that lead to educational gaps among our students. For instance, some teachers may end up having mostly high achieving, well-behaved students in their classrooms, while other teachers may consistently have classrooms with low achieving students, students with special needs, and students who exhibit behavior problems. In the case of the latter, it seems unfair to hold teachers accountable for the shortcomings of their students’ abilities. Even the best teachers are not miracle workers.

The sad reality of education is that some children do not have the ability to achieve standards within the time periods set by of NCLB. Teachers should be held accountable for students’ test performance; but the focus of that accountability should be a teacher’s ability to improve student’s test scores based on the student’s level of achievement when he/she enters the teacher’s classroom. For example, a student who is well below the expected level of proficiency at the beginning of the school year may not reach the expected proficiency level at the end of the school year, but they may show significant improvement. This is a better measure of a teacher’s effectiveness and their ability to impact student learning.

In addition to concerns about job security, low compensation, and student performance on high stakes test, teachers must also worry about subpar principals who are overcompensated for the successes of teachers. Although administrators deserve to be fairly compensated for their work, their pay does not seem equitable compared to that of teachers. If administrators are to be compensated fairly for the job performed, then teachers, too, should be fairly compensated.

MatthewLynch is based in West Chester, Pennsylvania, United States of America, and is an Anchor on Allvoices.
Report Credibility
  • Clear
  • Share:
  • Share
  • Clear
  • Clear
  • Clear
  • Clear

News Stories

  • Reformulating “No Child Left Behind Act” the Pelosi Way

      Canadian Free Press
    Title I, the federal government's flagship aid program for disadvantaged students...Act of 2001 was signed into law by President Bush on January 8, 2002. The No Child Left Behind Act was intended to push student achievement by holding states and...
  • Schools flunk? That’s bunk, Southland educators say

      Daily Southtown
    The school is in the only school district in Will County to make Adequate Yearly Progress. Matthew Grotto~Sun-Times Media The Southland's public schools are following a growing statewide trend of failing their educational mission, if standards set by...
  • What the new NAEP test results really tell us

      Washington Post
    Here's what the newly released scores for the 2011 administration of the National Assessment of Educational Progress show for fourth and eighth graders in reading and math, on a 500-point scale: In math , fourth and eighth graders scored on average 1...
  • Kan. students improve in math, reading

      The Hutchinson News
    Kansas students posted gains in math and reading scores on 2011 National Assessment of Education Progress tests, especially when compared to scores from 2003, education officials announced Tuesday. State Education Commissioner Diane DeBacker said...
  • Nation’s Report Card Shows U.S. Schoolchildren Miss Grade in Reading, Math

      Moreover Silicon Valley
    2011 Only three in 10 U.S. schoolchildren make the grade in reading, the U.S...About half of fourth-graders knew that a right triangle and a rectangle each had at least one right angle, according to a federal test, known as the Nation's Report Card.
  • County learns lesson in 'No Child' expectations

      Daily Chronicle
    Before taking over as superintendent for Genoa-Kingston School District 424 in 2010, Burgess was superintendent for Tuscola School District 301, where North Ward Elementary School won a National Blue Ribbon for academic excellence a sign the school...

More From Allvoices

Report Your News Got a similar story?
Add it to the network!

Or add related content to this report

Use of this site is governed by our Terms of Use Agreement and Privacy Policy.

© Allvoices, Inc. 2008-2014. All rights reserved. Powered by PulsePoint.